Use of Probabilistic Methods to Assess a Portfolio of Conventional and Unconventional Resources

Alistair Jones, Chris Mijnssen, Andrew Burton, M. Ewin
{"title":"Use of Probabilistic Methods to Assess a Portfolio of Conventional and Unconventional Resources","authors":"Alistair Jones, Chris Mijnssen, Andrew Burton, M. Ewin","doi":"10.2118/192088-MS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Recoverable hydrocarbon resource assessments underpin decision making and business planning in the oil and gas industry. Understanding the uncertainty associated with the resource assessments are key to sound decisions that are robust against low or high outcomes. This paper outlines a probabilistic approach to resource assessment in order to characterise resource uncertainty in a portfolio containing primarily Coal Seam Gas resources.\n The Probabilistic Resource Assessment (PRA) process outlined in this paper allows calculation of risked and unrisked probabilistically derived commercially recoverable resources at a field or permit level as well as at a portfolio level. This process incorporates Undiscovered (\"Prospective\") resources and Contingent Resources as well as resources that are producing or are under development. The key steps in this process include: definition of input distributions, probabilistic calculation of technically recoverable resources at a field level, estimation of economic chance of success, probabilistic estimate of commercially recoverable resource and aggregation of resources to a portfolio level.\n This process has been applied within an integrated joint venture supplying Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) and domestic gas markets. The process has been used primarily to understand the uncertainty range of the total resource as well as the production profile within the upstream portfolio. Sensitivities to product prices or development costs can be investigated to enable a deep understanding of the key drivers and variables of the resource assessment.\n Various methods for determining recoverable hydrocarbon resources have been well documented. Broadly speaking, these methods can be categorised as probabilistic methods and deterministic methods. Typically, unconventional resources are assessed using deterministic methods. The process presented here is a robust probabilistic approach to determine a risked view of recoverable resources within an entire portfolio including both unconventional and conventional resources.","PeriodicalId":11182,"journal":{"name":"Day 3 Thu, October 25, 2018","volume":"114 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 3 Thu, October 25, 2018","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/192088-MS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recoverable hydrocarbon resource assessments underpin decision making and business planning in the oil and gas industry. Understanding the uncertainty associated with the resource assessments are key to sound decisions that are robust against low or high outcomes. This paper outlines a probabilistic approach to resource assessment in order to characterise resource uncertainty in a portfolio containing primarily Coal Seam Gas resources. The Probabilistic Resource Assessment (PRA) process outlined in this paper allows calculation of risked and unrisked probabilistically derived commercially recoverable resources at a field or permit level as well as at a portfolio level. This process incorporates Undiscovered ("Prospective") resources and Contingent Resources as well as resources that are producing or are under development. The key steps in this process include: definition of input distributions, probabilistic calculation of technically recoverable resources at a field level, estimation of economic chance of success, probabilistic estimate of commercially recoverable resource and aggregation of resources to a portfolio level. This process has been applied within an integrated joint venture supplying Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) and domestic gas markets. The process has been used primarily to understand the uncertainty range of the total resource as well as the production profile within the upstream portfolio. Sensitivities to product prices or development costs can be investigated to enable a deep understanding of the key drivers and variables of the resource assessment. Various methods for determining recoverable hydrocarbon resources have been well documented. Broadly speaking, these methods can be categorised as probabilistic methods and deterministic methods. Typically, unconventional resources are assessed using deterministic methods. The process presented here is a robust probabilistic approach to determine a risked view of recoverable resources within an entire portfolio including both unconventional and conventional resources.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用概率方法评估常规和非常规资源组合
可采油气资源评估是油气行业决策和业务规划的基础。了解与资源评估相关的不确定性是针对低或高结果做出稳健决策的关键。本文概述了一种资源评估的概率方法,以表征主要含煤层气资源的投资组合中的资源不确定性。本文概述的概率资源评估(PRA)过程允许在油田或许可级别以及投资组合级别计算有风险和无风险的概率衍生商业可采资源。这个过程包括未发现(“潜在”)资源、潜在资源以及正在生产或正在开发的资源。该过程的关键步骤包括:输入分布的定义、油田一级技术可采资源的概率计算、经济成功机会的估计、商业可采资源的概率估计和资源组合水平的聚集。这一过程已在一家供应液化天然气(LNG)和国内天然气市场的综合合资企业中得到应用。该过程主要用于了解总资源的不确定性范围以及上游投资组合中的生产概况。可以调查对产品价格或开发成本的敏感性,以便深入了解资源评估的关键驱动因素和变量。确定可采油气资源的各种方法已经有了很好的记录。从广义上讲,这些方法可以分为概率方法和确定性方法。通常,非常规资源的评估采用确定性方法。本文介绍的过程是一种稳健的概率方法,用于确定包括非常规和常规资源在内的整个投资组合中可采资源的风险视图。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Discrete Net-to-Gross Truncated Gaussian Simulation: An Alternative Modelling Approach for CSG Unconventional Reservoirs, Bowen Basin, Eastern Australia Where the Laterals Go? A Feasible Way for the Trajectory Measurement of Radial Jet Drilling Wells Embracing Opportunities and Avoiding Pitfalls of Probabilistic Modelling in Field Development Planning Efficient Integration Method of Large-Scale Reservoir Compaction and Small-Scale Casing Stability Models for Oilfield Casing Failure Analysis Monitoring Water Flood Front Movement by Propagating High Frequency Pulses Through Subsurface Transmission Lines
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1