{"title":"Evaluation of panoramic image quality in three images system.","authors":"Amaal kadhim ALSaadi","doi":"10.26477/idj.v36i3.22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In vitro study to evaluate the diagnostic image quality of dental panoramic radiography by comparing between conventional and digital systems. Aim of the Study: The aim of this study was to compare and evaluate the image quality of panoramic radiograph. Material and Method: Study comparing the image quality of dental Panoramic between conventional and digital in three dental institutions diagnostic imaging department. Forty five panoramic image were collected and divided in to three groups consisting of conventional images obtained with STRATO 2000, CE by VILLA SISTEMI MEDICALI–ITALY (screen based film) Dimax3digital system pan/ceph, PLANMECA, Helsinki, Finland, and Kodak 8000 carestream health, France (CCD X–ray image sensor). Image quality was assessed by rating the visibility of three evaluation aspect commonly found on panoramic radiographs for each image Depending on three evaluation aspect which is include the anatomy coverage, contrast and density of the teeth and anatomical structure, high score representing better image quality and the lower score indicating poor image quality. Results: the data collected from the evaluation of digital and film based image by two examiner were analyzed by chi square and the difference was statistically significant. Conclusion: The highest quality scores were obtained with carestream health digital system whereas images from Dimax3 digital system and conventional panoramic image type by VILLA SISTEMI were ranked significantly lower.","PeriodicalId":78326,"journal":{"name":"Iraqi Dental Journal","volume":"15 1","pages":"101-103"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iraqi Dental Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26477/idj.v36i3.22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
In vitro study to evaluate the diagnostic image quality of dental panoramic radiography by comparing between conventional and digital systems. Aim of the Study: The aim of this study was to compare and evaluate the image quality of panoramic radiograph. Material and Method: Study comparing the image quality of dental Panoramic between conventional and digital in three dental institutions diagnostic imaging department. Forty five panoramic image were collected and divided in to three groups consisting of conventional images obtained with STRATO 2000, CE by VILLA SISTEMI MEDICALI–ITALY (screen based film) Dimax3digital system pan/ceph, PLANMECA, Helsinki, Finland, and Kodak 8000 carestream health, France (CCD X–ray image sensor). Image quality was assessed by rating the visibility of three evaluation aspect commonly found on panoramic radiographs for each image Depending on three evaluation aspect which is include the anatomy coverage, contrast and density of the teeth and anatomical structure, high score representing better image quality and the lower score indicating poor image quality. Results: the data collected from the evaluation of digital and film based image by two examiner were analyzed by chi square and the difference was statistically significant. Conclusion: The highest quality scores were obtained with carestream health digital system whereas images from Dimax3 digital system and conventional panoramic image type by VILLA SISTEMI were ranked significantly lower.
通过比较传统系统和数字系统,评价口腔全景x线摄影诊断图像质量的体外研究。研究目的:本研究的目的是比较和评价全景x线片的图像质量。材料与方法:比较三所牙科机构诊断影像学常规与数字化牙科全景图像质量的研究。收集45张全景图像并将其分为三组,其中包括由VILLA SISTEMI medici - italy(基于屏幕的胶片)获得的STRATO 2000, CE,芬兰赫尔辛基PLANMECA的dimax3数字系统pan/ceph和法国Kodak 8000 carestream health (CCD x射线图像传感器)获得的常规图像。图像质量是通过对全景x线片上常见的三个评价方面对每张图像的可见性进行评分来评估的,根据三个评价方面包括解剖覆盖、牙齿的对比度和密度以及解剖结构,得分高表示图像质量较好,得分低表示图像质量较差。结果:两名审查员对数字影像和胶片影像的评价数据进行卡方分析,差异有统计学意义。结论:carestream健康数字系统获得的影像质量评分最高,而Dimax3数字系统和VILLA SISTEMI传统全景影像类型的影像质量评分明显较低。