Informatics Engineering Students’ Competence in English: Formative and Summative Assessment

Andi Idayani
{"title":"Informatics Engineering Students’ Competence in English: Formative and Summative Assessment","authors":"Andi Idayani","doi":"10.31849/lectura.v12i2.7291","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Assessment is the ways of teachers/lecturers gather data about their teaching and their students’ learning. In order to grapple with what seems to be an over use of testing, educators should frame their view of testing as assessment and that assessment is information. In relation to this, the researcher interested in conducting a study which is focus on assessing Informatics Engineering students’ competence in English. The researcher used descriptive research. The population of the reaserch was the informatics Engineering students which total students was 160 students at the second semester. Purposive sampling used in this study in order to focus the finding which the number of sample was 40 students. This study used formative and summative assessment in assessing students’ comptence in English. Following that, the data was collected during teaching and learning process in form of observation, documentation, and test. After that, the data was analyzed by using statistical in term of norm-references and criterion-references. Based on the result of this study, it could be concluded that the formative assessment format mostly designed in speaking and listening test format and summative assessment was applied all in English skills format since the lecturer consider that it is beneficial for students to master the particular skills as the requirements for applying into their careers.","PeriodicalId":31676,"journal":{"name":"Lectura Jurnal Pendidikan","volume":"63 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lectura Jurnal Pendidikan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31849/lectura.v12i2.7291","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Assessment is the ways of teachers/lecturers gather data about their teaching and their students’ learning. In order to grapple with what seems to be an over use of testing, educators should frame their view of testing as assessment and that assessment is information. In relation to this, the researcher interested in conducting a study which is focus on assessing Informatics Engineering students’ competence in English. The researcher used descriptive research. The population of the reaserch was the informatics Engineering students which total students was 160 students at the second semester. Purposive sampling used in this study in order to focus the finding which the number of sample was 40 students. This study used formative and summative assessment in assessing students’ comptence in English. Following that, the data was collected during teaching and learning process in form of observation, documentation, and test. After that, the data was analyzed by using statistical in term of norm-references and criterion-references. Based on the result of this study, it could be concluded that the formative assessment format mostly designed in speaking and listening test format and summative assessment was applied all in English skills format since the lecturer consider that it is beneficial for students to master the particular skills as the requirements for applying into their careers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
信息工程专业学生英语能力:形成性与总结性评估
评估是教师/讲师收集他们的教学和学生学习数据的方式。为了解决过度使用考试的问题,教育工作者应该将考试视为评估,而评估就是信息。为此,研究者有意开展一项研究,重点是评估信息工程专业学生的英语能力。研究者采用了描述性研究。研究对象为信息工程专业的学生,第二学期共有160名学生。本研究采用了有目的的抽样,以重点研究样本数量为40名学生的发现。本研究采用形成性评价与总结性评价相结合的方法评价学生的英语能力。然后,在教学过程中以观察、记录和测试的形式收集数据。然后,采用标准参照和标准参照的统计学方法对数据进行分析。根据本研究的结果,我们可以得出结论,形成性的评估形式主要设计为口语和听力测试形式,而总结性评估则全部采用英语技能形式,因为讲师认为这有利于学生掌握特定的技能,作为他们在职业生涯中应用的要求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Financing Management for Poor Students: Internal or External? Development of Learning Media for Writing Pantun Based on Mobile Learning Using WordPress Content Management System Building Students’ Confidence in Speaking English through Differentiated Instruction Development of Educandy-Based Interactive Poster Learning Media in Elementary School for Natural and Social Sciences Lessons Animation-Based Learning Motivation Analysis on Human Digestive System Material to Evaluate Students’ Motivation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1