{"title":"From Tinkering to Thinkering. Tinkering as Critical and Creative Thinking Enhancer","authors":"A. Poce, F. Amenduni, C. D. Medio","doi":"10.20368/1971-8829/1639","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The scientific community of educators has been more and more interested in Tinkering as an informal method to engage students with STEM subjects. Recent research has highlighted that Tinkering could be adopted not only to develop students’ scientific knowledge but also to support thinking processes such as Critical Thinking and Creative Problem Solving. Despite these assumptions, there is still a lack of research concerning the impact of Tinkering on the development of the 21st Century skills. That is why the Centre for Museum Studies - University of Roma Tre investigated the impact of Tinkering activities on Critical and Creative thinking skills enhancement in museum educators and teachers involved in STEM education. The Centre for Museum Studies conducted a pilot study with 30 participants at Citta della Scienza science centre (Naples), where museum educators and STEM teachers participated in a two-day workshop on collaborative Tinkering activities. During the workshop, participants were required to take two kinds of pre and post-tests with the aim of assessing Critical and Creative thinking skills development. On the one hand, in the Creative Thinking post-test participants showed significant improvement. On the other hand, despite there were no statistical differences concerning Critical Thinking assessment, a slight improvement in the post-test could be quantified. Follow up research is required, where it will be necessary to expand the sample of the study and use different measures for Critical and Creative Thinking assessment.","PeriodicalId":44748,"journal":{"name":"Journal of E-Learning and Knowledge Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of E-Learning and Knowledge Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20368/1971-8829/1639","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
The scientific community of educators has been more and more interested in Tinkering as an informal method to engage students with STEM subjects. Recent research has highlighted that Tinkering could be adopted not only to develop students’ scientific knowledge but also to support thinking processes such as Critical Thinking and Creative Problem Solving. Despite these assumptions, there is still a lack of research concerning the impact of Tinkering on the development of the 21st Century skills. That is why the Centre for Museum Studies - University of Roma Tre investigated the impact of Tinkering activities on Critical and Creative thinking skills enhancement in museum educators and teachers involved in STEM education. The Centre for Museum Studies conducted a pilot study with 30 participants at Citta della Scienza science centre (Naples), where museum educators and STEM teachers participated in a two-day workshop on collaborative Tinkering activities. During the workshop, participants were required to take two kinds of pre and post-tests with the aim of assessing Critical and Creative thinking skills development. On the one hand, in the Creative Thinking post-test participants showed significant improvement. On the other hand, despite there were no statistical differences concerning Critical Thinking assessment, a slight improvement in the post-test could be quantified. Follow up research is required, where it will be necessary to expand the sample of the study and use different measures for Critical and Creative Thinking assessment.
科学界的教育工作者越来越感兴趣的是,修补作为一种非正式的方法,让学生参与到STEM学科中来。最近的研究强调,修修补补不仅可以用来发展学生的科学知识,还可以用来支持批判性思维和创造性解决问题的思维过程。尽管有这些假设,但关于修修补补对21世纪技能发展的影响的研究仍然缺乏。这就是为什么罗马第三大学博物馆研究中心调查了修补活动对参与STEM教育的博物馆教育工作者和教师的批判性和创造性思维技能提高的影响。博物馆研究中心在Citta della Scienza科学中心(那不勒斯)与30名参与者进行了一项试点研究,博物馆教育工作者和STEM教师参加了为期两天的协作修补活动研讨会。在研讨会期间,参与者被要求进行两种测试,目的是评估批判性和创造性思维技能的发展。一方面,在创造性思维测试后,参与者表现出了显著的进步。另一方面,尽管在批判性思维评估方面没有统计学差异,但在后测试中略有改善可以量化。后续研究是必需的,这将是必要的,以扩大研究的样本,并使用不同的措施,批判性和创造性思维的评估。
期刊介绍:
SIe-L , Italian e-Learning Association, is a non-profit organization who operates as a non-commercial entity to promote scientific research and testing best practices of e-Learning and Distance Education. SIe-L consider these subjects strategic for citizen and companies for their instruction and education.