The Law Enforcement Of Rehabilitation Sanctions Against Narcotics Users

Irsano Marthanova Erisky, Widayati Widayati
{"title":"The Law Enforcement Of Rehabilitation Sanctions Against Narcotics Users","authors":"Irsano Marthanova Erisky, Widayati Widayati","doi":"10.30659/ldj.3.2.453-459","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study is to identify and analyze the enforcement of rehabilitation sanctions against narcotics users at the Central Java Regional Police and to identify and analyze the obstacles in law enforcement of rehabilitation sanctions against narcotics users at the Central Java Regional Police. This study uses a sociological juridical approach, with descriptive analytical research specifications. The data used are primary and secondary data which will be analyzed qualitatively. The research problems were analyzed using the theory of justice and the theory of expediency. The results of the study conclude that looking at the criminal provisions of Article 127 paragraphs (2) and (3), it can be concluded that judges in deciding cases referred to in Article 127 paragraph (1) are required to pay attention to the articles that regulate rehabilitation provisions so that later addicts and victims Drug abusers can be rehabilitated. The obstacles that come from the government, it is stated that there are 5 (five) obstacles, namely: a) There has not been a special place for addicts and victims of narcotics abusers to rehabilitate, b) The problem of rehabilitation costs for convicts of abuse cases narcotics, c) There is no rehabilitation center appointed by the Government, d) There is a difference in information between the defendant, witnesses and the results of the criminalistic laboratory. e) An execution problem occurred.","PeriodicalId":55646,"journal":{"name":"Law Environment and Development Journal","volume":"97 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law Environment and Development Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30659/ldj.3.2.453-459","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to identify and analyze the enforcement of rehabilitation sanctions against narcotics users at the Central Java Regional Police and to identify and analyze the obstacles in law enforcement of rehabilitation sanctions against narcotics users at the Central Java Regional Police. This study uses a sociological juridical approach, with descriptive analytical research specifications. The data used are primary and secondary data which will be analyzed qualitatively. The research problems were analyzed using the theory of justice and the theory of expediency. The results of the study conclude that looking at the criminal provisions of Article 127 paragraphs (2) and (3), it can be concluded that judges in deciding cases referred to in Article 127 paragraph (1) are required to pay attention to the articles that regulate rehabilitation provisions so that later addicts and victims Drug abusers can be rehabilitated. The obstacles that come from the government, it is stated that there are 5 (five) obstacles, namely: a) There has not been a special place for addicts and victims of narcotics abusers to rehabilitate, b) The problem of rehabilitation costs for convicts of abuse cases narcotics, c) There is no rehabilitation center appointed by the Government, d) There is a difference in information between the defendant, witnesses and the results of the criminalistic laboratory. e) An execution problem occurred.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
戒毒制裁的执法问题
本研究的目的是确定和分析中爪哇地区警察对吸毒者实施康复制裁的情况,并确定和分析中爪哇地区警察对吸毒者实施康复制裁的障碍。本研究采用社会学法学方法,并辅以描述性分析研究规范。所使用的数据是主要和次要数据,将进行定性分析。运用正义理论和权宜理论对研究问题进行了分析。研究结果的结论是,从第127条第(2)款和第(3)款的刑事规定来看,可以得出的结论是,法官在裁决第127条第(1)款所述案件时,应注意规定康复规定的条款,以便使后来的吸毒者和受害者能够康复。来自政府的障碍,据说有5(5)个障碍,即:a)没有一个专门的地方供吸毒者和毒品滥用者的受害者康复,b)滥用毒品案件的罪犯的康复费用问题,c)没有政府指定的康复中心,d)被告,证人和犯罪实验室的结果之间的信息存在差异。e)发生执行问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Juridical Analysis in Viewing the Position of Reported Revocation of Complaints A General Criminal One Party by the Reporter in Investigation Process The Criminological Ideas in the Criminal Enforcement of Illegal Logging The Criminal Policy in Efforts to Overcome Crimes Perpetrated by the Indonesian National Army An Investigator's Discretion in State Assets Confiscation Criminal Action Case of Corruption The Legal Protection for Children as Criminal Actors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1