Awareness and knowledge regarding emergency contraception in Berlin adolescents

F. V. von Rosen, A. J. von Rosen, F. Müller-Riemenschneider, P. Tinnemann
{"title":"Awareness and knowledge regarding emergency contraception in Berlin adolescents","authors":"F. V. von Rosen, A. J. von Rosen, F. Müller-Riemenschneider, P. Tinnemann","doi":"10.1080/13625187.2016.1269162","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background: Lack of information has been described as a major factor in non-use of oral emergency contraception (EC) following unprotected intercourse. Despite the ongoing vociferous debate on liberalisation of access, little evidence is available on EC knowledge in Germany, particularly among adolescents. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional survey among ninth graders in convenience sample of 13 Berlin schools. We assessed perceived and actual knowledge on the effectiveness, timeframe and availability of EC and on pregnancy risk in six scenarios. Results: A total of 1177 students between 13 and 16 years of age participated. Mean age was 14.6 years (standard deviation 0.67); 51.4% of participants were male. Whilst 8.7% had never heard of EC, 38.6% knew of its effectiveness, but only 12.7% knew the timeframe for EC. Of the sources of EC, only gynaecologists were widely known. Most students correctly evaluated pregnancy risk in given scenarios. Girls were more knowledgeable on most topics except for pregnancy risk. Attending a school of lower academic standard and being of immigrant background was associated with lower knowledge on the majority of items. Conclusions: Generally, students were aware of the existence of EC, but many lacked the knowledge of when to take it and how to access it. Especially in the light of the recent liberalisation of EC access in Germany, increased educational efforts are warranted to ensure that the population has the knowledge necessary to make a truly informed choice regarding its use.","PeriodicalId":22423,"journal":{"name":"The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care","volume":"40 1","pages":"45 - 52"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13625187.2016.1269162","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

Abstract Background: Lack of information has been described as a major factor in non-use of oral emergency contraception (EC) following unprotected intercourse. Despite the ongoing vociferous debate on liberalisation of access, little evidence is available on EC knowledge in Germany, particularly among adolescents. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional survey among ninth graders in convenience sample of 13 Berlin schools. We assessed perceived and actual knowledge on the effectiveness, timeframe and availability of EC and on pregnancy risk in six scenarios. Results: A total of 1177 students between 13 and 16 years of age participated. Mean age was 14.6 years (standard deviation 0.67); 51.4% of participants were male. Whilst 8.7% had never heard of EC, 38.6% knew of its effectiveness, but only 12.7% knew the timeframe for EC. Of the sources of EC, only gynaecologists were widely known. Most students correctly evaluated pregnancy risk in given scenarios. Girls were more knowledgeable on most topics except for pregnancy risk. Attending a school of lower academic standard and being of immigrant background was associated with lower knowledge on the majority of items. Conclusions: Generally, students were aware of the existence of EC, but many lacked the knowledge of when to take it and how to access it. Especially in the light of the recent liberalisation of EC access in Germany, increased educational efforts are warranted to ensure that the population has the knowledge necessary to make a truly informed choice regarding its use.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
柏林青少年对紧急避孕的认识和知识
背景:缺乏信息被认为是无保护性交后不使用口服紧急避孕药(EC)的主要因素。尽管关于自由获取的激烈辩论正在进行,但在德国,特别是在青少年中,很少有证据表明欧共体知识。方法:对柏林13所学校的便利样本进行横断面调查。我们评估了六种情况下EC的有效性、时间框架和可用性以及妊娠风险的认知和实际知识。结果:共有1177名13 - 16岁的学生参与。平均年龄14.6岁(标准差0.67);51.4%的参与者为男性。8.7%的人从未听说过EC, 38.6%的人知道EC的有效性,但只有12.7%的人知道EC的时间表。在EC的来源中,只有妇科医生是广为人知的。大多数学生正确地评估了给定情况下的怀孕风险。除了怀孕风险,女孩对大多数话题都更了解。就读于学术水平较低的学校和移民背景与大多数项目的低知识相关。结论:学生普遍意识到电子商务的存在,但很多人缺乏什么时候参加电子商务以及如何获得电子商务的知识。特别是鉴于最近在德国放开使用欧共体,有必要加强教育努力,以确保人民掌握必要的知识,对欧共体的使用作出真正知情的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pain relief during intrauterine device placement in nulligravid women with both oral ketorolac and an analgesic: a double-blinded randomised trial Legal abortion requests and outcomes for women when the law is restrictive – experience from a referral centre in south-eastern Brazil ‘Do I want children later in life?’ Reproductive intentions of 1700 adolescents Oestrogens in oral contraception: considerations for tailoring prescription to women’s needs Prevalence of high-risk HPV and cervical dysplasia in IUD users and controls: a cross sectional study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1