Improved Approximation and Scalability for Fair Max-Min Diversification

Raghavendra Addanki, A. Mcgregor, A. Meliou, Zafeiria Moumoulidou
{"title":"Improved Approximation and Scalability for Fair Max-Min Diversification","authors":"Raghavendra Addanki, A. Mcgregor, A. Meliou, Zafeiria Moumoulidou","doi":"10.4230/LIPIcs.ICDT.2022.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Given an $n$-point metric space $(\\mathcal{X},d)$ where each point belongs to one of $m=O(1)$ different categories or groups and a set of integers $k_1, \\ldots, k_m$, the fair Max-Min diversification problem is to select $k_i$ points belonging to category $i\\in [m]$, such that the minimum pairwise distance between selected points is maximized. The problem was introduced by Moumoulidou et al. [ICDT 2021] and is motivated by the need to down-sample large data sets in various applications so that the derived sample achieves a balance over diversity, i.e., the minimum distance between a pair of selected points, and fairness, i.e., ensuring enough points of each category are included. We prove the following results: 1. We first consider general metric spaces. We present a randomized polynomial time algorithm that returns a factor $2$-approximation to the diversity but only satisfies the fairness constraints in expectation. Building upon this result, we present a $6$-approximation that is guaranteed to satisfy the fairness constraints up to a factor $1-\\epsilon$ for any constant $\\epsilon$. We also present a linear time algorithm returning an $m+1$ approximation with exact fairness. The best previous result was a $3m-1$ approximation. 2. We then focus on Euclidean metrics. We first show that the problem can be solved exactly in one dimension. For constant dimensions, categories and any constant $\\epsilon>0$, we present a $1+\\epsilon$ approximation algorithm that runs in $O(nk) + 2^{O(k)}$ time where $k=k_1+\\ldots+k_m$. We can improve the running time to $O(nk)+ poly(k)$ at the expense of only picking $(1-\\epsilon) k_i$ points from category $i\\in [m]$. Finally, we present algorithms suitable to processing massive data sets including single-pass data stream algorithms and composable coresets for the distributed processing.","PeriodicalId":90482,"journal":{"name":"Database theory-- ICDT : International Conference ... proceedings. International Conference on Database Theory","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Database theory-- ICDT : International Conference ... proceedings. International Conference on Database Theory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.ICDT.2022.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Given an $n$-point metric space $(\mathcal{X},d)$ where each point belongs to one of $m=O(1)$ different categories or groups and a set of integers $k_1, \ldots, k_m$, the fair Max-Min diversification problem is to select $k_i$ points belonging to category $i\in [m]$, such that the minimum pairwise distance between selected points is maximized. The problem was introduced by Moumoulidou et al. [ICDT 2021] and is motivated by the need to down-sample large data sets in various applications so that the derived sample achieves a balance over diversity, i.e., the minimum distance between a pair of selected points, and fairness, i.e., ensuring enough points of each category are included. We prove the following results: 1. We first consider general metric spaces. We present a randomized polynomial time algorithm that returns a factor $2$-approximation to the diversity but only satisfies the fairness constraints in expectation. Building upon this result, we present a $6$-approximation that is guaranteed to satisfy the fairness constraints up to a factor $1-\epsilon$ for any constant $\epsilon$. We also present a linear time algorithm returning an $m+1$ approximation with exact fairness. The best previous result was a $3m-1$ approximation. 2. We then focus on Euclidean metrics. We first show that the problem can be solved exactly in one dimension. For constant dimensions, categories and any constant $\epsilon>0$, we present a $1+\epsilon$ approximation algorithm that runs in $O(nk) + 2^{O(k)}$ time where $k=k_1+\ldots+k_m$. We can improve the running time to $O(nk)+ poly(k)$ at the expense of only picking $(1-\epsilon) k_i$ points from category $i\in [m]$. Finally, we present algorithms suitable to processing massive data sets including single-pass data stream algorithms and composable coresets for the distributed processing.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
公平最大最小分散的改进逼近和可扩展性
给定一个$n$点度量空间$(\mathcal{X},d)$,其中每个点属于$m=O(1)$个不同类别或组中的一个,以及一组整数$k_1, \ldots, k_m$,公平的Max-Min多样化问题是选择$k_i$个属于类别$i\in [m]$的点,使所选点之间的最小对向距离最大化。该问题是由Moumoulidou等人提出的[ICDT 2021],其动机是在各种应用中需要对大型数据集进行下采样,以便衍生样本在多样性(即一对选定点之间的最小距离)和公平性(即确保每个类别包含足够的点)之间取得平衡。我们证明了以下结果:1。我们首先考虑一般度量空间。我们提出了一种随机多项式时间算法,该算法返回多样性的因子$2$近似值,但仅满足期望中的公平性约束。在此结果的基础上,我们提出了一个$6$-近似,它保证对任何常数$ $\epsilon$满足一个因子$1- $的公平性约束。我们还提出了一种线性时间算法,返回具有精确公平性的$m+1$近似值。之前最好的结果是300 -1美元的近似值。2. 然后我们关注欧几里得度量。我们首先证明了这个问题可以在一维中精确地解决。对于常数维度,类别和任意常数$\epsilon> $,我们提出了一个$1+\epsilon$近似算法,该算法在$O(nk) + 2^{O(k)}$时间内运行,其中$k=k_1+\ldots+k_m$。我们可以将运行时间提高到$O(nk)+ poly(k)$,代价是只从类别$i\in [m]$中选取$(1-\epsilon) k_i$点。最后,我们提出了适合处理海量数据集的算法,包括单通道数据流算法和用于分布式处理的可组合核心集。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Generalizing Greenwald-Khanna Streaming Quantile Summaries for Weighted Inputs A Simple Algorithm for Consistent Query Answering under Primary Keys Size Bounds and Algorithms for Conjunctive Regular Path Queries Compact Data Structures Meet Databases (Invited Talk) Enumerating Subgraphs of Constant Sizes in External Memory
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1