Detect Polyphenol and Fatty Acid Content of Two Wild Plants Collected in Mazne Sub-district, Kurdistan Region of Iraq

S. A. Kurdi
{"title":"Detect Polyphenol and Fatty Acid Content of Two Wild Plants Collected in Mazne Sub-district, Kurdistan Region of Iraq","authors":"S. A. Kurdi","doi":"10.12944/crnfsj.11.1.27","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Celtis tournefortii Lam and Prosopis farcta plant's antioxidant and polyphenolic characteristics have been attributed to the various phytochemicals, including phenolic and fatty acids, present in the crude extract in the leaves, fruits, pods, and seeds. This study's aim is to determine the entire phytochemical compositions of the leaf and fruit reflect Celtis tournefortii Lam, while pod and seed represent Prosopis farcta from Mazne sub-district, including proximate analysis, total antioxidant capacity, total organic acids, ascorbic acids, polyphenols, and fatty acids following established procedures. Pods have higher levels of fiber (41± 0.05 mg/100 g), protein (20.3±0.05%), and vitamin C (26.47±0.03 mg/100 g) from Prosopis farcta, although fruit has higher levels of total antioxidants (89.54± 0.28%) and organic acid (1576±0.57 mg/kg) from Celtis tournefortii Lam. Gallic acid (10.56±0.03 mg/kg) had the highest concentration of polyphenols, whereas the pod contained the highest concentrations of quercetin (11.27±0.14 mg/kg), rutin (13.0±0.57 mg/kg), coumaric acid (2140.57 mg/kg), and chlorogenic acid (659.0±0.57 mg/kg). Oleic acid 32.60±0.24%, Cis-11-Eicosenoic 3.20±0.11%, and Cis-4,7,10,13,16,19-Docosahexaenoic 2.10±0.05% were the most prevalent unsaturated fatty acids in the seed, whereas palmitic 17.40±0.05% and tricosanoic 6.40±0.05% were the most prevalent saturated fatty acids in the leaves. Overall, seeds had the highest concentration of unsaturated fatty acids (74.44%), while leaves had the highest concentration of saturated fatty acids (44.42%). This study identifies two untamed plants, Celtis tournefortii Lam and Prosopis farcta, as potential new sources of natural oil and beneficial natural ingredients.","PeriodicalId":10916,"journal":{"name":"Current Research in Nutrition and Food Science Journal","volume":"185 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Research in Nutrition and Food Science Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12944/crnfsj.11.1.27","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Celtis tournefortii Lam and Prosopis farcta plant's antioxidant and polyphenolic characteristics have been attributed to the various phytochemicals, including phenolic and fatty acids, present in the crude extract in the leaves, fruits, pods, and seeds. This study's aim is to determine the entire phytochemical compositions of the leaf and fruit reflect Celtis tournefortii Lam, while pod and seed represent Prosopis farcta from Mazne sub-district, including proximate analysis, total antioxidant capacity, total organic acids, ascorbic acids, polyphenols, and fatty acids following established procedures. Pods have higher levels of fiber (41± 0.05 mg/100 g), protein (20.3±0.05%), and vitamin C (26.47±0.03 mg/100 g) from Prosopis farcta, although fruit has higher levels of total antioxidants (89.54± 0.28%) and organic acid (1576±0.57 mg/kg) from Celtis tournefortii Lam. Gallic acid (10.56±0.03 mg/kg) had the highest concentration of polyphenols, whereas the pod contained the highest concentrations of quercetin (11.27±0.14 mg/kg), rutin (13.0±0.57 mg/kg), coumaric acid (2140.57 mg/kg), and chlorogenic acid (659.0±0.57 mg/kg). Oleic acid 32.60±0.24%, Cis-11-Eicosenoic 3.20±0.11%, and Cis-4,7,10,13,16,19-Docosahexaenoic 2.10±0.05% were the most prevalent unsaturated fatty acids in the seed, whereas palmitic 17.40±0.05% and tricosanoic 6.40±0.05% were the most prevalent saturated fatty acids in the leaves. Overall, seeds had the highest concentration of unsaturated fatty acids (74.44%), while leaves had the highest concentration of saturated fatty acids (44.42%). This study identifies two untamed plants, Celtis tournefortii Lam and Prosopis farcta, as potential new sources of natural oil and beneficial natural ingredients.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
伊拉克库尔德斯坦地区Mazne街道采集的两种野生植物多酚和脂肪酸含量测定
鹿角草和鹿角草的抗氧化和多酚特性归因于各种植物化学物质,包括酚类和脂肪酸,存在于叶子、果实、豆荚和种子的粗提取物中。本研究的目的是确定叶片和果实的整个植物化学成分反映了刺荆草,而豆荚和种子代表了来自Mazne分区的棘荆草,包括近似分析、总抗氧化能力、总有机酸、抗坏血酸、多酚和脂肪酸。豆荚含有较高水平的纤维(41±0.05 mg/100 g)、蛋白质(20.3±0.05%)和维生素C(26.47±0.03 mg/100 g),尽管果实含有较高水平的总抗氧化剂(89.54±0.28%)和有机酸(1576±0.57 mg/kg),来自鹿角草。未食子酸(10.56±0.03 mg/kg)的多酚含量最高,槲皮素(11.27±0.14 mg/kg)、芦丁(13.0±0.57 mg/kg)、香豆酸(2140.57 mg/kg)和绿原酸(659.0±0.57 mg/kg)的含量最高。种子中最常见的不饱和脂肪酸为油酸(32.60±0.24%)、顺式-11-二十烯酸(3.20±0.11%)和顺式-4,7,10,13,16,19-二十二碳六烯酸(2.10±0.05%),叶片中最常见的饱和脂肪酸为棕榈酸(17.40±0.05%)和三糖酸(6.40±0.05%)。总体而言,种子的不饱和脂肪酸含量最高(74.44%),叶片的饱和脂肪酸含量最高(44.42%)。本研究确定了两种未驯化的植物,Celtis tournefortii Lam和Prosopis farcta,作为潜在的天然油和有益天然成分的新来源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Introduction and Validation of a New Suchitra Scoring System and Determining the Cut off Value for Healthy Lifestyle Among College Students - Kumbakonam Urban Rural Epidemiological Study- KURES- 8 Phenolic Compounds, Free Radical Scavenging Activity and α-Glucosidase Inhibition Properties of Green, Oolong and Black Sacha Inchi Tea Extract Production and Characterization of Nata from Yam Bean Juice using Komagataeibacter nataicola TISTR 975 The Biological, Biochemical, and Immunological Impact of Broccoli and Green Pea Sprouts on Acrylamide Intoxicated Rats Cholesterol-lowering Effect of Protein Hydrolysates from Lemongrass (Cymbopogon citratus Stapf.)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1