Ten Years and a Million Links: Building a global taxonomic library connecting persistent identifiers for names (LSIDs), publications (DOIs), and people (ORCIDs)

Roderic Page
{"title":"Ten Years and a Million Links: Building a global taxonomic library connecting persistent identifiers for names (LSIDs), publications (DOIs), and people (ORCIDs)","authors":"Roderic Page","doi":"10.3897/biss.7.112053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One thing the field of biodiversity informatics has been very good at is creating databases. However, this success in creation has not been matched by equivalent success in creating deep links between records in those databases. Instead, we create an ever growing number of silos. An obvious route to “silo-breaking” is the shared use of the same persistent identifiers for the same entities across those databases. For example, we have minted millions of Life Science Identifiers (LSIDs) for taxonomic names (which can be resolved at lsid.io), and a growing number of taxonomic papers have Digital Object Identifiers (DOIs), but we lack connections between these two identifiers. In this talk I describe work over the last decade to make these connections between LSIDs and DOIs across three large taxonomic databases: Index Fungorum, International Plant Names Index (IPNI), and the Index to Organism Names (ION) (Page 2023). Over a million names have been matched to DOIs or other persistent identifiers for taxonomic publications (Fig. 1 shows the coverage of publications for animal names). This represents approximately 36% of animal, plant or fungal names for which publication data is available.\n The mappings between LSIDs and publication persistent identifiers (PIDs) such as DOIs and Wikidata item identifiers, are made available through ChecklistBank (datasets 129659, 164203, 128415), and also archived in Zenodo. By combining these LSID and DOI links with Open Researcher and Contributor ID (ORCIDs) for taxonomists, we can potentially gain insight into who is doing taxonomic research, where they work, and how they are funded. Possible applications of this data are discussed, including a tool to discover the citation for a species name (Species Cite, Fig. 2), using DOI to ORCIDs to discover who is doing taxonomic research, and creating a linked data version of the Catalogue of Life.","PeriodicalId":9011,"journal":{"name":"Biodiversity Information Science and Standards","volume":"71 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biodiversity Information Science and Standards","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3897/biss.7.112053","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

One thing the field of biodiversity informatics has been very good at is creating databases. However, this success in creation has not been matched by equivalent success in creating deep links between records in those databases. Instead, we create an ever growing number of silos. An obvious route to “silo-breaking” is the shared use of the same persistent identifiers for the same entities across those databases. For example, we have minted millions of Life Science Identifiers (LSIDs) for taxonomic names (which can be resolved at lsid.io), and a growing number of taxonomic papers have Digital Object Identifiers (DOIs), but we lack connections between these two identifiers. In this talk I describe work over the last decade to make these connections between LSIDs and DOIs across three large taxonomic databases: Index Fungorum, International Plant Names Index (IPNI), and the Index to Organism Names (ION) (Page 2023). Over a million names have been matched to DOIs or other persistent identifiers for taxonomic publications (Fig. 1 shows the coverage of publications for animal names). This represents approximately 36% of animal, plant or fungal names for which publication data is available. The mappings between LSIDs and publication persistent identifiers (PIDs) such as DOIs and Wikidata item identifiers, are made available through ChecklistBank (datasets 129659, 164203, 128415), and also archived in Zenodo. By combining these LSID and DOI links with Open Researcher and Contributor ID (ORCIDs) for taxonomists, we can potentially gain insight into who is doing taxonomic research, where they work, and how they are funded. Possible applications of this data are discussed, including a tool to discover the citation for a species name (Species Cite, Fig. 2), using DOI to ORCIDs to discover who is doing taxonomic research, and creating a linked data version of the Catalogue of Life.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
十年和一百万个链接:构建一个连接名称(lsid)、出版物(doi)和人员(orcid)的持久标识符的全球分类库
生物多样性信息学领域非常擅长的一件事是创建数据库。然而,在这些数据库中创建记录之间的深度链接方面,并没有取得相应的成功。相反,我们创造了越来越多的孤岛。“打破竖井”的一个明显途径是在这些数据库中为相同的实体共享相同的持久标识符。例如,我们已经为分类名称创建了数百万个生命科学标识符(lsid)(可以在lsid.io上解析),并且越来越多的分类论文具有数字对象标识符(doi),但我们缺乏这两个标识符之间的联系。在这次演讲中,我描述了过去十年来在三个大型分类数据库中建立LSIDs和doi之间联系的工作:真菌索引,国际植物名称索引(IPNI)和生物名称索引(ION)(第2023页)。超过一百万个名称已经与分类出版物的doi或其他持久标识符相匹配(图1显示了动物名称出版物的覆盖范围)。这代表了有出版数据的动物、植物或真菌名称的大约36%。lsid和发布持久标识符(例如doi和Wikidata项目标识符)之间的映射可以通过ChecklistBank(数据集129659、164203、128415)获得,也可以在Zenodo中存档。通过将这些LSID和DOI链接与分类学家的开放研究人员和贡献者ID (orcid)结合起来,我们可以潜在地了解谁在进行分类研究,他们在哪里工作,以及他们是如何获得资助的。讨论了这些数据的可能应用,包括发现物种名称引用的工具(物种引用,图2),使用DOI到orcid来发现谁正在进行分类学研究,以及创建生命目录的链接数据版本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Meeting Report for the Phenoscape TraitFest 2023 with Comments on Organising Interdisciplinary Meetings Implementation Experience Report for the Developing Latimer Core Standard: The DiSSCo Flanders use-case Structuring Information from Plant Morphological Descriptions using Open Information Extraction The Future of Natural History Transcription: Navigating AI advancements with VoucherVision and the Specimen Label Transcription Project (SLTP) Comparative Study: Evaluating the effects of class balancing on transformer performance in the PlantNet-300k image dataset
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1