Unintended Effects of Policy Interactions in the Health Sector: A Case of Kerala, India

Maurya Dayashankar, Sibasis Hense
{"title":"Unintended Effects of Policy Interactions in the Health Sector: A Case of Kerala, India","authors":"Maurya Dayashankar, Sibasis Hense","doi":"10.1177/00195561221121035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The governments of developing countries, including India, are pursuing policy mixes in collaboration with the private sector to strengthen the public health system. However, little is known about the interaction of public policies with different instrument logics. We conducted a contextual analysis of two health policies with different instrument logics—emergency care and social health insurance programme—for over a decade in Kerala, employing primary and secondary data, government reports, newspaper articles, and published and unpublished literature. Our analysis suggests that the competition between policies has led to policies working at crossroads. The low political salience of emergency care has led to the diversion of resources and attention to government health insurance programmes. Thus, emergency care is increasingly facilitated at private facilities, shifting the government’s role from service delivery to financing. Our findings also highlight that the interaction effects among health policies receive limited attention among researchers and practitioners. These findings are relevant to countries of similar economies undergoing New Public Management reforms leading to the weakening of the public system in dealing with health functions such as emergency care.","PeriodicalId":85707,"journal":{"name":"The Indian journal of public administration : quarterly journal of the Indian Institute of Public Administration","volume":"302 1","pages":"138 - 150"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Indian journal of public administration : quarterly journal of the Indian Institute of Public Administration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00195561221121035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The governments of developing countries, including India, are pursuing policy mixes in collaboration with the private sector to strengthen the public health system. However, little is known about the interaction of public policies with different instrument logics. We conducted a contextual analysis of two health policies with different instrument logics—emergency care and social health insurance programme—for over a decade in Kerala, employing primary and secondary data, government reports, newspaper articles, and published and unpublished literature. Our analysis suggests that the competition between policies has led to policies working at crossroads. The low political salience of emergency care has led to the diversion of resources and attention to government health insurance programmes. Thus, emergency care is increasingly facilitated at private facilities, shifting the government’s role from service delivery to financing. Our findings also highlight that the interaction effects among health policies receive limited attention among researchers and practitioners. These findings are relevant to countries of similar economies undergoing New Public Management reforms leading to the weakening of the public system in dealing with health functions such as emergency care.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
卫生部门政策互动的意外影响:以印度喀拉拉邦为例
包括印度在内的发展中国家政府正在寻求与私营部门合作的混合政策,以加强公共卫生系统。然而,人们对公共政策与不同工具逻辑之间的相互作用知之甚少。我们利用第一手和二手数据、政府报告、报纸文章以及已发表和未发表的文献,对喀拉拉邦十多年来采用不同工具逻辑的两项卫生政策——紧急护理和社会健康保险计划——进行了背景分析。我们的分析表明,政策之间的竞争导致政策在十字路口发挥作用。紧急护理在政治上的重要性较低,导致资源和注意力被转移到政府健康保险方案上。因此,私营机构的急救服务日益便利,政府的角色从提供服务转向提供资金。我们的研究结果还强调,卫生政策之间的相互作用效应受到研究人员和从业人员的有限关注。这些发现与类似经济体的国家有关,这些国家正在进行新的公共管理改革,导致公共系统在处理紧急护理等卫生职能方面受到削弱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Management of Kasturba Gandhi Balika Vidyalayas in Andhra Pradesh: The Perceptions of the Stakeholders Red Volunteers in West Bengal: Lessons for Public Leadership in a Pandemic Exploring Foreign Direct Investment in Railway Modernisation Projects in India Functioning of Unitary Universities in India Crime Against Women in India: A Theoretical Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1