Topical issues of the formation of the legal status of independent experts accredited to conduct anti-corruption examinations

O. Kazantseva
{"title":"Topical issues of the formation of the legal status of independent experts accredited to conduct anti-corruption examinations","authors":"O. Kazantseva","doi":"10.31857/s102694520021765-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article examines the patterns of formation and implementation of the legal status of independent experts, accredited to conduct anti-corruption expert examinations. Scientific research is based on many years of experience in conducting independent anti-corruption expert examinations of normative legal acts and their drafts as an independent expert accredited by the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation. The author came to the conclusion about the lack of clear legal regulation of the status of independent experts, which prevents its formation as an effective preventive mechanism against corruption. In order to improve the effectiveness of independent experts and to avoid problems arising in practice, it is necessary to specify at the legislative level all elements of the legal status of independent experts (rights, duties, responsibilities, guarantees), as well as the procedure of relations with public authorities in case of disagreement on the results of an independent anticorruption expertise.","PeriodicalId":82769,"journal":{"name":"Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo","volume":"109 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31857/s102694520021765-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article examines the patterns of formation and implementation of the legal status of independent experts, accredited to conduct anti-corruption expert examinations. Scientific research is based on many years of experience in conducting independent anti-corruption expert examinations of normative legal acts and their drafts as an independent expert accredited by the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation. The author came to the conclusion about the lack of clear legal regulation of the status of independent experts, which prevents its formation as an effective preventive mechanism against corruption. In order to improve the effectiveness of independent experts and to avoid problems arising in practice, it is necessary to specify at the legislative level all elements of the legal status of independent experts (rights, duties, responsibilities, guarantees), as well as the procedure of relations with public authorities in case of disagreement on the results of an independent anticorruption expertise.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
确立经认可进行反贪考试的独立专家的法律地位的专题问题
文章考察了独立专家法律地位的形成模式和实施方式,委托专家进行反腐败专家审查。科学研究是基于多年来作为俄罗斯联邦司法部认可的独立专家对规范性法律行为及其草案进行独立反腐败专家审查的经验。笔者得出结论,独立专家的地位缺乏明确的法律规定,阻碍了其作为一种有效的预防腐败机制的形成。为了提高独立专家的效力并避免在实践中出现问题,有必要在立法一级规定独立专家法律地位的所有要素(权利、义务、责任、保障),以及在对独立反腐败专家的结果产生分歧时与公共当局建立关系的程序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Legal protection and rational use of geological heritage in geoparks The Russian system of pre-trial proceedings as a synthesis of different types of criminal procedure Legal regulation circulation of digital rights in United States of America Feignfullness prohibition: administrative and legal research with elements of an economic approach The first Criminal Code of Soviet Russia and the responsibility of professional criminals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1