Analysis of the Deflection of Over-Truss Bridge Deck Using Finite Element Approach

J. Wasiu, Seyi Olatunde-Agbooro
{"title":"Analysis of the Deflection of Over-Truss Bridge Deck Using Finite Element Approach","authors":"J. Wasiu, Seyi Olatunde-Agbooro","doi":"10.36108/ujees/2202.40.0211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Deflection is basically the bend or curve that occurs within materials when loads are applied to them. A structure should be designed to be able to properly resist the applied loads and failure to do that makes the deflection visible and consequently lead to failure. During the course of this work the dead load, live load and environmental wind load acting on the bridge structure were calculated using the Analytical method and the calculated loads were used to analyze the bridge numerically using the STAAD pro software. The Plate stress animation from the STAAD software showed portions that were under intense loading on the concrete deck. From the animation, Steel beams 42, 45, 49, 53 and 57 were directly supporting these portions of the decks and were chosen for analysis. These beams were analyzed in terms of deflection, shear and bending. The values for shear, deflection, and bending for the five steel beams were compared under both approaches and their percentage difference was calculated. Comparing the results obtained from the analytical and numerical method gave a percentage difference of 4.39 %, 0.6 %, 0.93 %, 3.67 % and 1.19 % for shear, 6.29 %, 3.23 %, 1.07 %, 4.28 % and 1.14 % for bending, 12.5 %, 7.6 %, 4.08 %, 2.45 % and 2.6 % for deflection. 80 % of results obtained were less than 5 % in percentage difference and with this result, it is concluded that both methods are suitable for design. The Numerical method was nevertheless chosen to be a more economical and accurate method because it incorporates reliable safety factors that cater for uncertainties in its approach","PeriodicalId":23413,"journal":{"name":"UNIOSUN Journal of Engineering and Environmental Sciences","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"UNIOSUN Journal of Engineering and Environmental Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36108/ujees/2202.40.0211","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Deflection is basically the bend or curve that occurs within materials when loads are applied to them. A structure should be designed to be able to properly resist the applied loads and failure to do that makes the deflection visible and consequently lead to failure. During the course of this work the dead load, live load and environmental wind load acting on the bridge structure were calculated using the Analytical method and the calculated loads were used to analyze the bridge numerically using the STAAD pro software. The Plate stress animation from the STAAD software showed portions that were under intense loading on the concrete deck. From the animation, Steel beams 42, 45, 49, 53 and 57 were directly supporting these portions of the decks and were chosen for analysis. These beams were analyzed in terms of deflection, shear and bending. The values for shear, deflection, and bending for the five steel beams were compared under both approaches and their percentage difference was calculated. Comparing the results obtained from the analytical and numerical method gave a percentage difference of 4.39 %, 0.6 %, 0.93 %, 3.67 % and 1.19 % for shear, 6.29 %, 3.23 %, 1.07 %, 4.28 % and 1.14 % for bending, 12.5 %, 7.6 %, 4.08 %, 2.45 % and 2.6 % for deflection. 80 % of results obtained were less than 5 % in percentage difference and with this result, it is concluded that both methods are suitable for design. The Numerical method was nevertheless chosen to be a more economical and accurate method because it incorporates reliable safety factors that cater for uncertainties in its approach
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超桁架桥面挠度的有限元分析
挠度基本上是材料在载荷作用下发生的弯曲或曲线。一个结构应该被设计成能够适当地抵抗施加的载荷,如果不能做到这一点,就会出现明显的挠度,从而导致破坏。采用解析法对桥梁结构的恒载、活载和环境风荷载进行了计算,并利用STAAD pro软件对桥梁进行了数值分析。来自STAAD软件的板应力动画显示了混凝土甲板上承受强烈载荷的部分。从动画中可以看出,钢梁42、45、49、53和57直接支撑着甲板的这些部分,并被选中进行分析。对这些梁进行了挠度、剪切和弯曲分析。在两种方法下比较了五根钢梁的剪切、挠度和弯曲值,并计算了它们的百分比差异。通过对解析法和数值法计算结果的比较,得出剪切法的差异为4.39%、0.6%、0.93%、3.67%和1.19%,弯曲法的差异为6.29%、3.23%、1.07%、4.28%和1.14%,挠曲法的差异为12.5%、7.6%、4.08%、2.45%和2.6%。所得结果中80%的百分比差小于5%,表明两种方法均适合设计。然而,选择数值方法是一种更经济和准确的方法,因为它包含可靠的安全系数,以满足其方法中的不确定性
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Use of GIS for Identifying Optimum Landfill Sites in Osogbo, Southwestern, Nigeria Development of a XLM-Encoded Machine-Readable Dictionary for Yoruba Word Sense Disambiguation Analyzing Cost Risk Indicators for Enhancing Construction Project Delivery Performance Vital Importance of Risk Assessment in Construction Project Procurement Method Selection Towards Sustainable Indoor Thermal Comfort in the Tropical Building Design: Comparative Performance Analysis of Fixed External Shading Elements and Differential Window Glass Thermal Properties
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1