PO-117 To compare the impact of running and walking on physical health

Xianfeng Hua
{"title":"PO-117 To compare the impact of running and walking on physical health","authors":"Xianfeng Hua","doi":"10.14428/EBR.V1I4.9943","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective Under the natural and comfortable condition of the private human body, explore which of the running and walking is more conducive to the physical health of the human body. \nMethods Among the sports crowd of the NanMingRiver Rubber Exercise Road in Guiyang City, select 20 people who have walking exercise habits and who can take the running test under the age of 60 as group A and select 20 people who have running exercise habits and who can take the walking test under the age of 60 as group B. Inclusion criteria for the exercise habits is “Exercise at least 3 times a week for more than 30 minutes and for more than one year.” \n(1) Experimental method: Two groups of subjects with different exercise modes adopted the exercise mode of the corresponding group. Under the condition that other environmental conditions were unchanged, the health benefits of different exercise methods in the same group were compared before and after the experiment. The time of experiment lasts three months. The intensity of walking exercise is the intensity that the athlete feels natural and comfortable. The intensity of running exercise is the intensity that the athlete feels natural and comfortable. Before and after the experiment,the test contents of the two group subjects included height, weight, BMI, grip strength, reaction time, closed-eyes standing on a leg, sitting body flexion, step test, lung capacity, lung capacity index of body mass. \n(2) Literature and Information method: Through the retrieval and review of relevant literatures on sports and physical health at home and abroad, this paper provides theoretical references and methodological basis for this research. \n(3) Data analysis method: Paired sample t-test was used to analyze the changes of constitution of the two groups experimental people before and after the exercise modes. \nResults After a 3-month walking in group A, the step test, lung capacity, and lung capacity index of body mass were higher than before, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.01). The grip strength, reaction time, closed-eyes standing on a leg decreased compared with prior exercise. The difference was statistically significant (P<0.05); body mass, body mass index (BMI), and sitting body flexion were higher than before, but the difference was not statistically significant. \nAfter three months of walking exercise in group B, the step test, lung capacity, lung capacity index of body mass, and grip strength decreased compared with the previous exercise, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.01); body mass , body mass index (BMI), reaction time, the closed-eye standing on one foot was lower than before, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The anterior flexion of the sitting body decreased, but the difference was not statistically significant. \nConclusions In comfortable, natural conditions, running is more conducive to physical fitness than walking, and running is a more effective way to exercise.","PeriodicalId":12276,"journal":{"name":"Exercise Biochemistry Review","volume":"71 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Exercise Biochemistry Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14428/EBR.V1I4.9943","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective Under the natural and comfortable condition of the private human body, explore which of the running and walking is more conducive to the physical health of the human body. Methods Among the sports crowd of the NanMingRiver Rubber Exercise Road in Guiyang City, select 20 people who have walking exercise habits and who can take the running test under the age of 60 as group A and select 20 people who have running exercise habits and who can take the walking test under the age of 60 as group B. Inclusion criteria for the exercise habits is “Exercise at least 3 times a week for more than 30 minutes and for more than one year.” (1) Experimental method: Two groups of subjects with different exercise modes adopted the exercise mode of the corresponding group. Under the condition that other environmental conditions were unchanged, the health benefits of different exercise methods in the same group were compared before and after the experiment. The time of experiment lasts three months. The intensity of walking exercise is the intensity that the athlete feels natural and comfortable. The intensity of running exercise is the intensity that the athlete feels natural and comfortable. Before and after the experiment,the test contents of the two group subjects included height, weight, BMI, grip strength, reaction time, closed-eyes standing on a leg, sitting body flexion, step test, lung capacity, lung capacity index of body mass. (2) Literature and Information method: Through the retrieval and review of relevant literatures on sports and physical health at home and abroad, this paper provides theoretical references and methodological basis for this research. (3) Data analysis method: Paired sample t-test was used to analyze the changes of constitution of the two groups experimental people before and after the exercise modes. Results After a 3-month walking in group A, the step test, lung capacity, and lung capacity index of body mass were higher than before, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.01). The grip strength, reaction time, closed-eyes standing on a leg decreased compared with prior exercise. The difference was statistically significant (P<0.05); body mass, body mass index (BMI), and sitting body flexion were higher than before, but the difference was not statistically significant. After three months of walking exercise in group B, the step test, lung capacity, lung capacity index of body mass, and grip strength decreased compared with the previous exercise, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.01); body mass , body mass index (BMI), reaction time, the closed-eye standing on one foot was lower than before, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The anterior flexion of the sitting body decreased, but the difference was not statistically significant. Conclusions In comfortable, natural conditions, running is more conducive to physical fitness than walking, and running is a more effective way to exercise.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
PO-117比较跑步和散步对身体健康的影响
目的在私密人体自然舒适的条件下,探讨跑步和散步哪一种更有利于人体的身体健康。方法在体育群NanMingRiver橡胶运动道路在贵阳市,选择20人步行锻炼习惯和谁能以运行测试60岁以下的为A组,选择20人跑步锻炼习惯,谁可以走路测试60岁以下组b .锻炼习惯的入选标准是“每周至少锻炼3次超过30分钟,超过一年。(1)实验方法:两组不同运动方式的被试采用对应组的运动方式。在其他环境条件不变的情况下,比较实验前后同一组不同运动方式的健康效益。实验时间为三个月。步行运动的强度是运动员感到自然舒适的强度。跑步运动的强度是运动员感到自然舒适的强度。实验前后,两组受试者的测试内容包括身高、体重、BMI、握力、反应时间、闭眼单腿站立、坐姿身体屈曲、台阶测试、肺活量、体重肺活量指数。(2)文献资料法:通过对国内外运动与身体健康相关文献的检索和综述,为本研究提供理论参考和方法基础。(3)数据分析方法:采用配对样本t检验分析两组实验人群在运动模式前后体质的变化。结果a组患者步行3个月后,步距试验、肺活量、体质量肺活量指数均高于治疗前,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。握力、反应时间、闭眼站腿与之前的锻炼相比有所下降。差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);身体质量、身体质量指数(BMI)、坐姿身体屈曲度均高于治疗前,但差异无统计学意义。B组步行运动3个月后,步距试验、肺活量、体质量肺活量指数、握力较运动前下降,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01);体重、体重指数(BMI)、反应时间、闭眼单脚站立均低于治疗前,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。坐体前屈度降低,但差异无统计学意义。结论在舒适、自然的条件下,跑步比步行更有利于身体健康,跑步是一种更有效的锻炼方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effects of Exercise on Gene Expression Exercise to Fight Disease Answers to Problems and Critical Thinking Questions Biochemical Assessment of Exercisers Iron Status
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1