Praca i słowa: humanizm socjalistyczny Karola Marksa w świetle foucaultowskiej tezy o kresie człowieka

IF 0.2 0 PHILOSOPHY HYBRIS Revista de Filosofia Pub Date : 2019-09-30 DOI:10.18778/1689-4286.46.06
T. Jativa
{"title":"Praca i słowa: humanizm socjalistyczny Karola Marksa w świetle foucaultowskiej tezy o kresie człowieka","authors":"T. Jativa","doi":"10.18778/1689-4286.46.06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Work and Words: Socialist Humanism of Karl Marx in Light of Foucault's Thesis about the Death of Men The aim of this paper is to compare philosophical methodologies of Karl Marx and Michel Foucault. The comparison is centered on the problem of humanism: whereas socialist humanism can be seen as a core belief of Marx's historical materialism, Foucault on the other hand is often described as the one of the most fierce critics of humanism. Presented analysis consists of: reconstruction of Marx's notion of work and its ontological and epistemological consequences, reconstruction of Foucault's critique of Marx's outlooks presented in The Order of Things and analysis of Foucault's thesis about the death of men. The author points out that the philosophical methodologies of Marx and Foucault are in fact similar to a large degree, as both philosophers can be described as materialists, nominalists. Furthermore, both for Marx and Foucault the human subject is to be thought as historical and socially manufactured being.","PeriodicalId":30478,"journal":{"name":"HYBRIS Revista de Filosofia","volume":"75 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HYBRIS Revista de Filosofia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18778/1689-4286.46.06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Work and Words: Socialist Humanism of Karl Marx in Light of Foucault's Thesis about the Death of Men The aim of this paper is to compare philosophical methodologies of Karl Marx and Michel Foucault. The comparison is centered on the problem of humanism: whereas socialist humanism can be seen as a core belief of Marx's historical materialism, Foucault on the other hand is often described as the one of the most fierce critics of humanism. Presented analysis consists of: reconstruction of Marx's notion of work and its ontological and epistemological consequences, reconstruction of Foucault's critique of Marx's outlooks presented in The Order of Things and analysis of Foucault's thesis about the death of men. The author points out that the philosophical methodologies of Marx and Foucault are in fact similar to a large degree, as both philosophers can be described as materialists, nominalists. Furthermore, both for Marx and Foucault the human subject is to be thought as historical and socially manufactured being.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从福柯关于人的死亡的论点看马克思的社会主义人文主义本文的目的是比较马克思和福柯的哲学方法论。这种比较集中在人本主义问题上:社会主义人本主义可以看作是马克思历史唯物主义的核心信念,而福柯则经常被描述为人本主义最激烈的批评者之一。本文的分析包括:重构马克思的工作概念及其本体论和认识论的结果,重构福柯对马克思在《事物的秩序》中提出的观点的批判,以及分析福柯关于人的死亡的论点。作者指出,马克思和福柯的哲学方法论实际上在很大程度上是相似的,因为两位哲学家都可以被描述为唯物主义者、唯名主义者。此外,对于马克思和福柯来说,人类主体都被认为是历史和社会制造的存在。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Teologiczne konsekwencje darwinizmu — „Bóg Darwina” Corneliusa G. Huntera Co to za świat? The Limits of Liberalism. Tradition, Individualism, and the crisis of freedom, Mark. T. Mitchell, University of Notre Dame Press, Indiana 2019, ss. 328 – Artykuł Recenzyjny Teoria interpretacji Paula Ricoeura i Hansa-Georga Gadamera. Analiza porównawcza Ideologia w edukacji. Spojrzenie opisowe, negatywne i pozytywne na przykładzie wybranych stanowisk pedagogiki katolickiej i krytycznej
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1