The impact of the method of presenting instructions of postoperative care on the quality of life after simple tooth extraction

Yaser A Alsahafi, A. Alolayan, Wejdan Alraddadi, Amna M. Alamri, Maryam Aljadani, Meshal H Alenazi, Shadia A. Elsayed
{"title":"The impact of the method of presenting instructions of postoperative care on the quality of life after simple tooth extraction","authors":"Yaser A Alsahafi, A. Alolayan, Wejdan Alraddadi, Amna M. Alamri, Maryam Aljadani, Meshal H Alenazi, Shadia A. Elsayed","doi":"10.4103/sjoralsci.sjoralsci_14_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The extraction of teeth is a common dental treatment. Healing complications have been reported to be influenced by patients' knowledge and compliance with postoperative instructions. Aim : The goal of the study was to define the influence of the way postoperative instructions delivering method on reducing morbidity and problems experienced after simple tooth extraction. Materials and Methods: A single-blind randomized clinical trial was designed at clinics of Oral Maxillofacial Surgery, Taibah University. Patients were distributed to two classes on a random basis. The first group was provided only with verbal instructions (VI) after dental extraction. The second group was given written and verbal (CVWI) instructions. Postoperative pain, swelling, sleep impairment, oral functions, and general activity were reported using an assessment tool for oral health life quality (OHQ). Results and Discussion: The mean OHQ scores were 14.28 ± 6.36 for VI and 13.46 ± 5.78 for CVWI, which did not indicate a statistical difference (P = 0.50). Of the 100 participants, 51% were mildly affected, whereas 22% were severely affected. Females constituted 51% of the study participants. There was a statistically significant difference between females' mean score values compared to males (15.78 ± 4.5–11.88 ± 6.5) with P = 0.001. About 56% of the participants were nonSaudis and 33% hold a high-school diploma. Conclusions : There was no difference between the two approaches used to present the postoperative instruction in the postextraction OHQ. Following tooth extraction, female patients experience a significantly greater decline in their OHQ. Translation of written postoperative instructions in more than one language should be available in our institution to improve OHQ during the postextraction period.","PeriodicalId":32335,"journal":{"name":"Saudi Journal of Oral Sciences","volume":"31 1","pages":"143 - 149"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Saudi Journal of Oral Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/sjoralsci.sjoralsci_14_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Introduction: The extraction of teeth is a common dental treatment. Healing complications have been reported to be influenced by patients' knowledge and compliance with postoperative instructions. Aim : The goal of the study was to define the influence of the way postoperative instructions delivering method on reducing morbidity and problems experienced after simple tooth extraction. Materials and Methods: A single-blind randomized clinical trial was designed at clinics of Oral Maxillofacial Surgery, Taibah University. Patients were distributed to two classes on a random basis. The first group was provided only with verbal instructions (VI) after dental extraction. The second group was given written and verbal (CVWI) instructions. Postoperative pain, swelling, sleep impairment, oral functions, and general activity were reported using an assessment tool for oral health life quality (OHQ). Results and Discussion: The mean OHQ scores were 14.28 ± 6.36 for VI and 13.46 ± 5.78 for CVWI, which did not indicate a statistical difference (P = 0.50). Of the 100 participants, 51% were mildly affected, whereas 22% were severely affected. Females constituted 51% of the study participants. There was a statistically significant difference between females' mean score values compared to males (15.78 ± 4.5–11.88 ± 6.5) with P = 0.001. About 56% of the participants were nonSaudis and 33% hold a high-school diploma. Conclusions : There was no difference between the two approaches used to present the postoperative instruction in the postextraction OHQ. Following tooth extraction, female patients experience a significantly greater decline in their OHQ. Translation of written postoperative instructions in more than one language should be available in our institution to improve OHQ during the postextraction period.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
术后护理指导方法对单纯拔牙术后生活质量的影响
拔牙是一种常见的牙科治疗方法。据报道,愈合并发症受患者知识和术后指导依从性的影响。目的:本研究的目的是确定术后指导传递方法对减少简单拔牙后的发病率和问题的影响。材料与方法:在泰巴大学口腔颌面外科门诊设计单盲随机临床试验。病人被随机分为两类。第一组拔牙后仅给予口头指导(VI)。第二组给予书面和口头(CVWI)指示。使用口腔健康生活质量评估工具(OHQ)报告术后疼痛、肿胀、睡眠障碍、口腔功能和一般活动。结果与讨论:VI患者平均OHQ评分为14.28±6.36,CVWI患者平均OHQ评分为13.46±5.78,两组比较差异无统计学意义(P = 0.50)。在100名参与者中,51%的人受到轻度影响,22%的人受到严重影响。女性占研究参与者的51%。女性与男性的平均评分(15.78±4.5 ~ 11.88±6.5)差异有统计学意义,P = 0.001。约56%的参与者是非沙特人,33%拥有高中文凭。结论:两种入路对拔牙后OHQ的指导无差异。拔牙后,女性患者OHQ明显下降。我们机构应提供一种以上语言的书面术后说明翻译,以提高术后的OHQ。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of alveolar bone level after orthodontic clear aligners treatment: A retrospective study Assessment of knowledge, attitude, and practice regarding artificial intelligence in histopathology: A cross-sectional study among oral pathologists in India Cross-sectional survey of resin-modified glass ionomer as dental restoration in Saudi Arabia Mandibular actinomyces osteomyelitis A comparative clinical evaluation of plaque removal efficacy of a chewable toothpaste tablet with conventional toothpaste in children – A randomized clinical trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1