Towards a common vision? Populist radical right parties’ positions on the EU common foreign and security policy towards Russia

IF 1.2 3区 社会学 Q1 AREA STUDIES Journal of Contemporary European Studies Pub Date : 2023-07-12 DOI:10.1080/14782804.2023.2235576
S. Shein, Egor Ryzhkin
{"title":"Towards a common vision? Populist radical right parties’ positions on the EU common foreign and security policy towards Russia","authors":"S. Shein, Egor Ryzhkin","doi":"10.1080/14782804.2023.2235576","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The growth of populism in the EU member states, as a large-scale internal challenge to the European integration project, has a projection on foreign policy of both national states and the European Union. The EU foreign policy, towards Russia, is the area where the deviation of populist programs and strategies from the positions of the mainstream is most clearly manifested. In this regard, it is necessary to determine the foreign policy orientations of the populist radical right parties of the EU member states regarding the EU foreign policy, towards Russia, and opportunities for their synchronization. The main conclusion of this research is that populist foreign policy orientations highlight the internal heterogeneity of the populist phenomenon. Populism in power and in opposition does not have the capacity to change the EU's foreign policy towards Russia. The nature of populism as an ideology, the instrumental use by right populists of the “theme of Russia” for “internal consumption”, and their mainstreaming in power are a significant barrier to the real challenge of the EU policy towards Russia","PeriodicalId":46035,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary European Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contemporary European Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14782804.2023.2235576","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The growth of populism in the EU member states, as a large-scale internal challenge to the European integration project, has a projection on foreign policy of both national states and the European Union. The EU foreign policy, towards Russia, is the area where the deviation of populist programs and strategies from the positions of the mainstream is most clearly manifested. In this regard, it is necessary to determine the foreign policy orientations of the populist radical right parties of the EU member states regarding the EU foreign policy, towards Russia, and opportunities for their synchronization. The main conclusion of this research is that populist foreign policy orientations highlight the internal heterogeneity of the populist phenomenon. Populism in power and in opposition does not have the capacity to change the EU's foreign policy towards Russia. The nature of populism as an ideology, the instrumental use by right populists of the “theme of Russia” for “internal consumption”, and their mainstreaming in power are a significant barrier to the real challenge of the EU policy towards Russia
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
走向共同的愿景?民粹主义极右翼政党对欧盟对俄共同外交和安全政策的立场
欧盟成员国民粹主义的增长,作为对欧洲一体化项目的大规模内部挑战,对民族国家和欧盟的外交政策都有预测。欧盟对俄外交政策是民粹主义纲领和战略偏离主流立场最明显的领域。在这方面,有必要确定欧盟成员国民粹主义极右翼政党在欧盟外交政策、对俄政策方面的外交政策取向及其同步的机会。本研究的主要结论是民粹主义外交政策取向凸显了民粹主义现象的内部异质性。无论是执政还是在野的民粹主义,都无法改变欧盟对俄罗斯的外交政策。民粹主义作为一种意识形态的本质、右翼民粹主义者将“俄罗斯主题”作为“内部消费”的工具,以及他们在权力中的主流化,都是欧盟对俄政策面临真正挑战的重大障碍
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
84
期刊介绍: The Journal of Contemporary European Studies (previously Journal of European Area Studies) seeks to provide a forum for interdisciplinary debate about the theory and practice of area studies as well as for empirical studies of European societies, politics and cultures. The central area focus of the journal is European in its broadest geographical definition. However, the examination of European "areas" and themes are enhanced as a matter of editorial policy by non-European perspectives. The Journal intends to attract the interest of both cross-national and single-country specialists in European studies and to counteract the worst features of Eurocentrism with coverage of non-European views on European themes.
期刊最新文献
The anxious and resilient European Union: experiencing FOMO in the increasingly geopolitical world order Transnational diffusion and far-right latent social movements: unveiling the survival of anti-immigration mobilisation in Portugal Pro-Western or pro-Russian? Elections, foreign policy and inter-party rivalry in Georgia Selective adherence to EU values and the quest for external coherence: a comparative discourse analysis of Czechia, Hungary, and Norway Amid Russia’s war in Ukraine Tracing nation branding in Slovakia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1