The Sensitivity Comparison of Immunodiagnostic Assays for Diagnosing Dengue Fever

M. Zahoor, Haji Bahadar, Salah Uddin, S. Naz
{"title":"The Sensitivity Comparison of Immunodiagnostic Assays for Diagnosing Dengue Fever","authors":"M. Zahoor, Haji Bahadar, Salah Uddin, S. Naz","doi":"10.15324/KJCLS.2016.48.4.275","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Dengue fever is a vector borne disease caused by a dengue virus. It is an RNA virus of the family flaviviridae, with different serotypes. Herein, we report our attempt to carry out a sensitivity comparison of immunodiagnostic assays for dengue fever in dengue positive patients. Blood samples from 189 volunteers were collected. To determine the sensitivity of the NS1 test, two different types of tests — immunochromatographic tri-line test and rapid dengue test (RDT) — as well as IgM and IgG capture ELISA were performed. The result of RDT has shown that 59.7% of volunteers were IgM positive and 50.2% were IgG positive. Conversely, the results from capture ELISA shows 79.8% and 59.7% for IgM and IgG, respectively. The sensitivity of the capture ELISA test for IgM and IgG was higher than that of immunochromatographic tri-line rapid test, but the specificity was lower. Therefore, to confirm dengue fever, we recommend performing more detailed, investigative tests since a single test may not be sufficient.","PeriodicalId":10080,"journal":{"name":"临床检验杂志","volume":"75 1","pages":"275-279"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"临床检验杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15324/KJCLS.2016.48.4.275","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Dengue fever is a vector borne disease caused by a dengue virus. It is an RNA virus of the family flaviviridae, with different serotypes. Herein, we report our attempt to carry out a sensitivity comparison of immunodiagnostic assays for dengue fever in dengue positive patients. Blood samples from 189 volunteers were collected. To determine the sensitivity of the NS1 test, two different types of tests — immunochromatographic tri-line test and rapid dengue test (RDT) — as well as IgM and IgG capture ELISA were performed. The result of RDT has shown that 59.7% of volunteers were IgM positive and 50.2% were IgG positive. Conversely, the results from capture ELISA shows 79.8% and 59.7% for IgM and IgG, respectively. The sensitivity of the capture ELISA test for IgM and IgG was higher than that of immunochromatographic tri-line rapid test, but the specificity was lower. Therefore, to confirm dengue fever, we recommend performing more detailed, investigative tests since a single test may not be sufficient.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
几种免疫诊断方法诊断登革热的敏感性比较
登革热是一种由登革热病毒引起的病媒传播疾病。它是黄病毒科的一种RNA病毒,具有不同的血清型。在此,我们报告了我们对登革热阳性患者进行登革热免疫诊断测定的敏感性比较的尝试。收集了189名志愿者的血液样本。为确定NS1检测的敏感性,采用免疫层析三线试验和快速登革试验(RDT)以及IgM和IgG捕获ELISA检测。RDT结果显示,59.7%的志愿者IgM阳性,50.2%的志愿者IgG阳性。相反,捕获ELISA结果显示IgM和IgG的阳性率分别为79.8%和59.7%。ELISA捕获法检测IgM和IgG的灵敏度高于免疫层析三线快速检测,但特异性较低。因此,为了确认登革热,我们建议进行更详细的调查性检测,因为单一检测可能不够。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10649
期刊介绍:
期刊最新文献
Relationship between Hypertension and the Declining Renal Function in Korean Adults Survey on Sexually Transmitted Infection Test of One Referral Laboratory in Seoul: Focused on Multiple Sexually Transmitted Diseases Risk of Stroke according to the Duration of Diabetes Mellitus with Hypertension Cathepsin B Is Implicated in Triglyceride (TG)-Induced Cell Death of Macrophage Mismatch Negativity Using Frequency Difference in Healthy Young Adults: Latency and Amplitude
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1