Pain perception and effectiveness of palatal approach anterior superior alveolar block anesthesia using single tooth anesthesia in children: A randomized controlled trial

S. Badr, R. Bacho
{"title":"Pain perception and effectiveness of palatal approach anterior superior alveolar block anesthesia using single tooth anesthesia in children: A randomized controlled trial","authors":"S. Badr, R. Bacho","doi":"10.4103/JPD.JPD_51_17","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Restoring multiple anterior teeth in children using conventional infiltration is challenging due to the need of multiple injections, a considerable amount of anesthetic solution, and lip numbness. The palatal approach anterior superior alveolar block injection (P-ASA) using the Wand single tooth anesthesia (STA) provides an alternative and innovative technique that overcomes several challenges and should be furtherly tested. Aim: The aim of this study was to compare the pain perception and the effectiveness of P-ASA injection using STA (Milestone Scientific, Inc.) and a 30 G × 0.5 inch needle, to the regular multiple maxillary infiltration local anesthetic technique (MIT) in restoring primary anterior maxillary teeth. Design: This study was designed as a randomized controlled clinical trial in which 64 healthy children who need restoration and/or pulp treatment on primary maxillary anterior teeth were assigned to either receiving P-ASA block injection or regular (MIT). Children's behavior was assessed during anesthesia administration objectively using face, legs, activity, cry, and consolability behavioral pain assessment scale (FLACC). Children's self-reported pain was evaluated subjectively at two different time points (directly after injection of anesthesia and after full dental treatment) using the Wong–Baker FACES pain rating scale (WBFPRS). Data were statistically analyzed using SPSS version 13.0 and statistical significance was determined as P ≤ 0.05. Results: Children receiving the P-ASA reported less pain both during and after anesthesia administration (P = 0.0001). Similar results of pain were reported after treatment completion using both techniques (P = 0.464). Conclusion: P-ASA can be considered as an excellent alternative to administer deep, fast, effective, and less painful anesthesia of the upper primary anterior teeth and related gingival tissues compared to MIT.","PeriodicalId":16711,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Dentistry","volume":"67 1","pages":"36 - 42"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/JPD.JPD_51_17","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Restoring multiple anterior teeth in children using conventional infiltration is challenging due to the need of multiple injections, a considerable amount of anesthetic solution, and lip numbness. The palatal approach anterior superior alveolar block injection (P-ASA) using the Wand single tooth anesthesia (STA) provides an alternative and innovative technique that overcomes several challenges and should be furtherly tested. Aim: The aim of this study was to compare the pain perception and the effectiveness of P-ASA injection using STA (Milestone Scientific, Inc.) and a 30 G × 0.5 inch needle, to the regular multiple maxillary infiltration local anesthetic technique (MIT) in restoring primary anterior maxillary teeth. Design: This study was designed as a randomized controlled clinical trial in which 64 healthy children who need restoration and/or pulp treatment on primary maxillary anterior teeth were assigned to either receiving P-ASA block injection or regular (MIT). Children's behavior was assessed during anesthesia administration objectively using face, legs, activity, cry, and consolability behavioral pain assessment scale (FLACC). Children's self-reported pain was evaluated subjectively at two different time points (directly after injection of anesthesia and after full dental treatment) using the Wong–Baker FACES pain rating scale (WBFPRS). Data were statistically analyzed using SPSS version 13.0 and statistical significance was determined as P ≤ 0.05. Results: Children receiving the P-ASA reported less pain both during and after anesthesia administration (P = 0.0001). Similar results of pain were reported after treatment completion using both techniques (P = 0.464). Conclusion: P-ASA can be considered as an excellent alternative to administer deep, fast, effective, and less painful anesthesia of the upper primary anterior teeth and related gingival tissues compared to MIT.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
儿童单牙麻醉腭入路前上牙槽阻滞麻醉的疼痛感知和效果:一项随机对照试验
背景:由于需要多次注射、大量的麻醉溶液和嘴唇麻木,使用传统的浸润法修复儿童多颗前牙是具有挑战性的。使用Wand单牙麻醉(STA)的腭入路前上牙槽阻滞注射(P-ASA)提供了一种替代和创新的技术,克服了一些挑战,需要进一步测试。目的:本研究的目的是比较使用STA (Milestone Scientific, Inc.)和30g × 0.5英寸针注射P-ASA与常规上颌多次浸润局麻技术(MIT)修复上颌前牙的疼痛感觉和效果。设计:本研究被设计为一项随机对照临床试验,其中64名需要修复和/或牙髓治疗的健康儿童被分配到接受P-ASA块注射或常规注射(MIT)。采用面部、腿部、活动、哭泣、安慰性行为疼痛评定量表(FLACC)对患儿麻醉过程中的行为进行客观评价。采用Wong-Baker FACES疼痛评定量表(WBFPRS)主观评估儿童在两个不同时间点(直接注射麻醉后和全牙治疗后)的自我报告疼痛。数据采用SPSS 13.0版本进行统计学分析,P≤0.05为差异有统计学意义。结果:接受P- asa的儿童在麻醉期间和麻醉后均报告疼痛减轻(P = 0.0001)。两种方法治疗结束后疼痛的结果相似(P = 0.464)。结论:与MIT相比,P-ASA是一种对上初级前牙及相关牙龈组织进行深度、快速、有效、疼痛小的麻醉的优良选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Application of Geographic Information System Marks a Revolutionary Change in Dental Sciences Pediatric Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome: "Wake Up Before It’s Too Late" Reviewing Nutritional Status in Children with Severe Early Childhood Caries Fragment Reattachment of Immature Permanent Incisors: Clinical Procedures and the Development of an Algorithm Filippi Syndrome: A Lesser Reported Craniodigital Syndrome with Unique Features
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1