Risk Factors and Clinical Outcomes of Unplanned Reintubation after Planned Extubation in Adult Patients admitted to the Intensive Care Unit after Cardiac Surgery

Ju-Hee Lee, H. Choi
{"title":"Risk Factors and Clinical Outcomes of Unplanned Reintubation after Planned Extubation in Adult Patients admitted to the Intensive Care Unit after Cardiac Surgery","authors":"Ju-Hee Lee, H. Choi","doi":"10.34250/jkccn.2022.15.3.88","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose : This study aimed to identify risk factors for unplanned reintubation after planned extubation and to analyze the clinical outcomes in patients admitted to the intensive care unit after cardiac surgery.Methods : The study examined patients who underwent intubation and planned extubation admitted to the intensive care unit after cardiac surgery between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2021. The reintubation group comprised 58 patients underwent unplanned reintubation within 7 days of planned extubation. The maintenance group comprised 116 patients who did not undergo reintubation and were matched with the reintubation group using the rational for matching criteria. Data were collected retrospectively from electronic medical records. We used the independent t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, χ2-test, Fisher’s exact test, and logistic regression analysis with SPSS/WIN 27.0.Results : The multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that albumin (odds ratio [OR]=0.38, 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.20-0.72), surgery time (OR=1.54, 95% CI=1.20-1.97), PaO2 before extubation (OR=0.85 per 10 mmHg, 95% CI=0.75-0.97), postoperative arrhythmia (OR=2.82, 95% CI=1.22-6.51), reoperation due to bleeding (OR=4.65, 95% CI=1.27-17.07), and postoperative acute renal failure (OR=2.97, 95% CI=1.09-8.04) were risk factors for unplanned reintubation. The reintubation group had a higher in-hospital mortality rate (χ2=33.74, p<.001), longer intensive care unit stay (Z=-7.81, p<.001), and longer hospital stay than the maintenance group (Z=-8.29, p<.001).Conclusion : These results identified risk factors and clinical outcomes of unplanned reintubation after planned extubation after cardiac surgery. These findings should be considered when developing and managing an intervention program to prevent and reduce the incidence of unplanned reintubation.","PeriodicalId":16247,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Korean Critical Care Nursing","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Korean Critical Care Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34250/jkccn.2022.15.3.88","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose : This study aimed to identify risk factors for unplanned reintubation after planned extubation and to analyze the clinical outcomes in patients admitted to the intensive care unit after cardiac surgery.Methods : The study examined patients who underwent intubation and planned extubation admitted to the intensive care unit after cardiac surgery between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2021. The reintubation group comprised 58 patients underwent unplanned reintubation within 7 days of planned extubation. The maintenance group comprised 116 patients who did not undergo reintubation and were matched with the reintubation group using the rational for matching criteria. Data were collected retrospectively from electronic medical records. We used the independent t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, χ2-test, Fisher’s exact test, and logistic regression analysis with SPSS/WIN 27.0.Results : The multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that albumin (odds ratio [OR]=0.38, 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.20-0.72), surgery time (OR=1.54, 95% CI=1.20-1.97), PaO2 before extubation (OR=0.85 per 10 mmHg, 95% CI=0.75-0.97), postoperative arrhythmia (OR=2.82, 95% CI=1.22-6.51), reoperation due to bleeding (OR=4.65, 95% CI=1.27-17.07), and postoperative acute renal failure (OR=2.97, 95% CI=1.09-8.04) were risk factors for unplanned reintubation. The reintubation group had a higher in-hospital mortality rate (χ2=33.74, p<.001), longer intensive care unit stay (Z=-7.81, p<.001), and longer hospital stay than the maintenance group (Z=-8.29, p<.001).Conclusion : These results identified risk factors and clinical outcomes of unplanned reintubation after planned extubation after cardiac surgery. These findings should be considered when developing and managing an intervention program to prevent and reduce the incidence of unplanned reintubation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
心脏手术后重症监护病房成年患者计划拔管后意外再插的危险因素和临床结果
目的:本研究旨在确定计划拔管后非计划再插管的危险因素,并分析心脏手术后入住重症监护病房的患者的临床结局。方法:研究调查了2017年1月1日至2021年12月31日期间在重症监护室接受心脏手术后插管和计划拔管的患者。再插管组58例患者在计划拔管后7天内进行计划外再插管。维持组116例患者未接受再插管治疗,按照配型标准与再插管组进行匹配。回顾性收集电子病历资料。采用独立t检验、Mann-Whitney U检验、χ2检验、Fisher确切检验和logistic回归分析,采用SPSS/WIN 27.0软件。结果:多因素logistic回归分析显示,白蛋白(优势比[OR]=0.38, 95%可信区间[CI]=0.20 ~ 0.72)、手术时间(OR=1.54, 95% CI=1.20 ~ 1.97)、拔管前PaO2 (OR=0.85 / 10mmhg, 95% CI=0.75 ~ 0.97)、术后心律失常(OR=2.82, 95% CI=1.22 ~ 6.51)、出血再手术(OR=4.65, 95% CI=1.27 ~ 17.07)、术后急性肾功能衰竭(OR=2.97, 95% CI=1.09 ~ 8.04)是非计划再插管的危险因素。与维持组相比,再插管组住院死亡率更高(χ2=33.74, p< 0.001),重症监护病房住院时间更长(Z=-7.81, p< 0.001),住院时间更长(Z=-8.29, p< 0.001)。结论:这些结果确定了心脏手术后计划拔管后非计划再插管的危险因素和临床结果。在制定和管理干预方案以预防和减少意外再插管发生率时,应考虑这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Factors influencing the clinical competence of nursing students Oral Hygiene Care of Endotracheal Intubated Patients in Korean Intensive Care Units : A Scoping Review A Survey on Situation-related Communication Educational Needs for Novice Intensive Care Unit Nurses Experience of Clinical Adaptation among Nurses in Intensive Care Unit Relationship between the Perceptions of ICU Nurses on the Disclosure of Patient Safety Incidents and Communication Barriers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1