The Composition of Aggregate Demand, Division of Labor and the Business Cycle

Ercan Karadaş
{"title":"The Composition of Aggregate Demand, Division of Labor and the Business Cycle","authors":"Ercan Karadaş","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3324722","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper introduces an internal propagation mechanism into a baseline multi-sector RBC model. The proposed mechanism, which is very similar to Keynes' spending multiplier in spirit, amplifies the impact of exogenous shocks significantly - a long-standing quest in the RBC literature. The main motivation for the mechanism is the following: the composition of consumption expenditures shows sizable cross-sectional differences across the population as a function of income and these differences determine the direction towards which people update their consumption bundle as their income change. In the paper, these observations are modeled through two types of agents (L and H-skill) who differ in terms of the occupations that they are specialized in and the composition of their consumption baskets. In addition, both types of agents have income dependent (non-homothetic) preferences which induce a strong desire to consume the good that the other type produces. To see how the resulting mechanism operates in response to a positive exogenous shock consider an innovator (H-skill) producing iPhones and a waiter (L-skill) producing dining services. A positive technology shock makes the innovator more productive and raises her income and with the additional income, she purchases relatively more dining services. This, in turn, raises the waiter's income as the demand for her labor services increases and with the additional income, she purchases a new iPhone, which creates further incentive for the innovator to work more. Importantly this second round work incentive for the innovator is not directly related to the original technology shock but to the demand from the waiter and that is exactly why the model generates significantly more amplification compare to other comparable RBC models.","PeriodicalId":11757,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Other Microeconomics: General Equilibrium & Disequilibrium Models of Financial Markets (Topic)","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Other Microeconomics: General Equilibrium & Disequilibrium Models of Financial Markets (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3324722","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This paper introduces an internal propagation mechanism into a baseline multi-sector RBC model. The proposed mechanism, which is very similar to Keynes' spending multiplier in spirit, amplifies the impact of exogenous shocks significantly - a long-standing quest in the RBC literature. The main motivation for the mechanism is the following: the composition of consumption expenditures shows sizable cross-sectional differences across the population as a function of income and these differences determine the direction towards which people update their consumption bundle as their income change. In the paper, these observations are modeled through two types of agents (L and H-skill) who differ in terms of the occupations that they are specialized in and the composition of their consumption baskets. In addition, both types of agents have income dependent (non-homothetic) preferences which induce a strong desire to consume the good that the other type produces. To see how the resulting mechanism operates in response to a positive exogenous shock consider an innovator (H-skill) producing iPhones and a waiter (L-skill) producing dining services. A positive technology shock makes the innovator more productive and raises her income and with the additional income, she purchases relatively more dining services. This, in turn, raises the waiter's income as the demand for her labor services increases and with the additional income, she purchases a new iPhone, which creates further incentive for the innovator to work more. Importantly this second round work incentive for the innovator is not directly related to the original technology shock but to the demand from the waiter and that is exactly why the model generates significantly more amplification compare to other comparable RBC models.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
总需求构成、劳动分工与经济周期
本文在基线多部门RBC模型中引入了一种内部传播机制。拟议的机制在精神上与凯恩斯的支出乘数非常相似,它显著放大了外生冲击的影响——这是RBC文献中长期以来的一个探索。这一机制的主要动机如下:消费支出的构成在人口中显示出相当大的横断面差异,作为收入的函数,这些差异决定了人们在收入变化时更新消费束的方向。在本文中,这些观察结果是通过两种类型的代理(L和H-skill)建模的,他们的专业职业和消费篮子的组成不同。此外,两种类型的代理人都有收入依赖(非同质)偏好,这引起了强烈的消费另一种类型生产的商品的欲望。为了了解由此产生的机制是如何应对积极的外生冲击的,请考虑一个创新者(h技能)生产iphone,一个服务员(l技能)提供餐饮服务。积极的技术冲击使创新者的生产力提高,收入增加,有了额外的收入,她购买了相对更多的餐饮服务。这反过来又提高了服务员的收入,因为对她的劳动服务的需求增加了,有了额外的收入,她买了一部新的iPhone,这进一步激励了创新者更多地工作。重要的是,创新者的第二轮工作激励与最初的技术冲击没有直接关系,而是与服务员的需求有关,这正是为什么该模型与其他可比较的RBC模型相比产生了更大的放大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Order-flow-based Leading Indicators of Short-term Liquidity Shortfalls An Equilibrium Model of Career Concerns, Investment Horizons, and Mutual Fund Value Added Information, Market Power and Welfare Stock Liquidity and Algorithmic Market Making During the COVID-19 Crisis Financial Information and Diverging Beliefs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1