“CNN Can Kiss My As$”

Andrea Lorenz, Carolyn Schmitt, Shannon McGregor, Daniel Malmer
{"title":"“CNN Can Kiss My As$”","authors":"Andrea Lorenz, Carolyn Schmitt, Shannon McGregor, Daniel Malmer","doi":"10.51685/jqd.2023.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"News consumption in the United States is polarized and fragmented, with an abundance of partisan news publications appealing to political identities on both the left and the right. Yet, there is an abundance of hyperpartisan news on the right, the content of which has been shown to be harmful to democracy. This study captures one of the most comprehensive pictures to date of the U.S. Americans who consume far-right media and makes connections between such media use and the state of American democracy. After a lengthy data-cleaning process, we analyzed open-ended survey responses from a nationally representative sample of more than 10,000 U.S. American adults, finding that nearly ten percent self-report at least one far-right news outlet as a primary news source. Furthermore, significantly more U.S. Americans report consuming far-right and moderate-right news outlets than counterparts on the left. We then examined the characteristics of this small but significant group, given the current political climate in the United States, finding that far-right news consumers are overwhelmingly white, male, Republican, Christian, and without a college degree. This study reinforces previous findings that patterns in hyperpartisan media usage demonstrate growing extremism in the U.S., and that it is deeply rooted in identity.","PeriodicalId":93587,"journal":{"name":"Journal of quantitative description: digital media","volume":"160 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of quantitative description: digital media","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51685/jqd.2023.015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

News consumption in the United States is polarized and fragmented, with an abundance of partisan news publications appealing to political identities on both the left and the right. Yet, there is an abundance of hyperpartisan news on the right, the content of which has been shown to be harmful to democracy. This study captures one of the most comprehensive pictures to date of the U.S. Americans who consume far-right media and makes connections between such media use and the state of American democracy. After a lengthy data-cleaning process, we analyzed open-ended survey responses from a nationally representative sample of more than 10,000 U.S. American adults, finding that nearly ten percent self-report at least one far-right news outlet as a primary news source. Furthermore, significantly more U.S. Americans report consuming far-right and moderate-right news outlets than counterparts on the left. We then examined the characteristics of this small but significant group, given the current political climate in the United States, finding that far-right news consumers are overwhelmingly white, male, Republican, Christian, and without a college degree. This study reinforces previous findings that patterns in hyperpartisan media usage demonstrate growing extremism in the U.S., and that it is deeply rooted in identity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“CNN可以亲我的屁股”
美国的新闻消费是两极化和碎片化的,大量的党派新闻出版物吸引了左翼和右翼的政治认同。然而,有大量关于右翼的极端党派新闻,其内容已被证明对民主有害。这项研究捕捉了迄今为止最全面的美国人消费极右翼媒体的画面之一,并将这种媒体的使用与美国民主状况联系起来。经过漫长的数据清理过程,我们分析了来自1万多名美国成年人的全国代表性样本的开放式调查反馈,发现近10%的人自我报告至少有一个极右翼新闻媒体是主要的新闻来源。此外,与左翼的美国人相比,更多的美国人表示他们会阅读极右翼和中右翼的新闻媒体。然后,考虑到美国当前的政治气候,我们研究了这个人数不多但意义重大的群体的特征,发现极右翼新闻消费者绝大多数是白人、男性、共和党人、基督徒,而且没有大学学位。这项研究强化了之前的发现,即超党派媒体的使用模式表明,美国的极端主义正在增长,而且这种极端主义深深植根于身份认同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
#Asylum: How Syrian Refugees Engage with Online Information Who Does(n't) Target You? A Dataset for The Study of Online Radicalization Through Incel Forum Archives Detecting Misinformation: Identifying False News Spread by Political Leaders in the Global South @Who? Investigating Possible Errors in Studies Linking Survey and Twitter Data
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1