{"title":"Effects of oral tilmicosin on health and performance in newly received beef heifers","authors":"J.D. Rivera , J.T. Johnson , G.K. Blue","doi":"10.15232/pas.2017-01639","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>The objective of these studies was to determine the effects of feeding tilmicosin on health and performance of newly received beef cattle. Beef heifers (n = 480) were used in 2 studies to determine effects of oral tilmicosin on health and performance. In Exp. 1, 320 heifers (BW = 196 ± 3.3 kg) were administered antimicrobial metaphylaxis before shipment. At arrival they were monitored for signs of bovine respiratory disease. When 10% of the population was morbid, heifers were assigned to either a control receiving diet (CON) or a diet providing 12.5 mg of tilmicosin/kg of BW (TIL). Treatments were fed for 14 d, and morbid animals were treated with injectable antibiotics. Cattle were weighed individually on d 0, 28, and 56. Data were analyzed as a randomized complete block, and morbidity was analyzed as nonparametric data. Feeding TIL resulted in reduced BW at d 28 (</span><em>P</em> = 0.03). Moreover, TIL decreases DMI during the first 14 d (<em>P</em> = 0.0001) and decreased ADG (<em>P</em> = 0.03) and G:F (<em>P</em> = 0.05) from d 0 to 28. There were no differences in morbidity (<em>P</em> = 0.20), and TIL increased total antibiotic cost (<em>P</em> = 0.004). In Exp. 2, 160 beef heifers (BW = 227 ± 2.3 kg) received no metaphylaxis and were processed at arrival. Feeding TIL did not affect morbidity (<em>P</em> = 0.44); however, TIL decreased the number of animals re-treated (<em>P</em> = 0.03) and increased total antibiotic cost (<em>P</em> = 0.04).</p></div>","PeriodicalId":22841,"journal":{"name":"The Professional Animal Scientist","volume":"34 1","pages":"Pages 42-50"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.15232/pas.2017-01639","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Professional Animal Scientist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1080744618300056","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
The objective of these studies was to determine the effects of feeding tilmicosin on health and performance of newly received beef cattle. Beef heifers (n = 480) were used in 2 studies to determine effects of oral tilmicosin on health and performance. In Exp. 1, 320 heifers (BW = 196 ± 3.3 kg) were administered antimicrobial metaphylaxis before shipment. At arrival they were monitored for signs of bovine respiratory disease. When 10% of the population was morbid, heifers were assigned to either a control receiving diet (CON) or a diet providing 12.5 mg of tilmicosin/kg of BW (TIL). Treatments were fed for 14 d, and morbid animals were treated with injectable antibiotics. Cattle were weighed individually on d 0, 28, and 56. Data were analyzed as a randomized complete block, and morbidity was analyzed as nonparametric data. Feeding TIL resulted in reduced BW at d 28 (P = 0.03). Moreover, TIL decreases DMI during the first 14 d (P = 0.0001) and decreased ADG (P = 0.03) and G:F (P = 0.05) from d 0 to 28. There were no differences in morbidity (P = 0.20), and TIL increased total antibiotic cost (P = 0.004). In Exp. 2, 160 beef heifers (BW = 227 ± 2.3 kg) received no metaphylaxis and were processed at arrival. Feeding TIL did not affect morbidity (P = 0.44); however, TIL decreased the number of animals re-treated (P = 0.03) and increased total antibiotic cost (P = 0.04).