Effects of oral tilmicosin on health and performance in newly received beef heifers

J.D. Rivera , J.T. Johnson , G.K. Blue
{"title":"Effects of oral tilmicosin on health and performance in newly received beef heifers","authors":"J.D. Rivera ,&nbsp;J.T. Johnson ,&nbsp;G.K. Blue","doi":"10.15232/pas.2017-01639","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>The objective of these studies was to determine the effects of feeding tilmicosin on health and performance of newly received beef cattle. Beef heifers (n = 480) were used in 2 studies to determine effects of oral tilmicosin on health and performance. In Exp. 1, 320 heifers (BW = 196 ± 3.3 kg) were administered antimicrobial metaphylaxis before shipment. At arrival they were monitored for signs of bovine respiratory disease. When 10% of the population was morbid, heifers were assigned to either a control receiving diet (CON) or a diet providing 12.5 mg of tilmicosin/kg of BW (TIL). Treatments were fed for 14 d, and morbid animals were treated with injectable antibiotics. Cattle were weighed individually on d 0, 28, and 56. Data were analyzed as a randomized complete block, and morbidity was analyzed as nonparametric data. Feeding TIL resulted in reduced BW at d 28 (</span><em>P</em> = 0.03). Moreover, TIL decreases DMI during the first 14 d (<em>P</em> = 0.0001) and decreased ADG (<em>P</em> = 0.03) and G:F (<em>P</em> = 0.05) from d 0 to 28. There were no differences in morbidity (<em>P</em> = 0.20), and TIL increased total antibiotic cost (<em>P</em> = 0.004). In Exp. 2, 160 beef heifers (BW = 227 ± 2.3 kg) received no metaphylaxis and were processed at arrival. Feeding TIL did not affect morbidity (<em>P</em> = 0.44); however, TIL decreased the number of animals re-treated (<em>P</em> = 0.03) and increased total antibiotic cost (<em>P</em> = 0.04).</p></div>","PeriodicalId":22841,"journal":{"name":"The Professional Animal Scientist","volume":"34 1","pages":"Pages 42-50"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.15232/pas.2017-01639","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Professional Animal Scientist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1080744618300056","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The objective of these studies was to determine the effects of feeding tilmicosin on health and performance of newly received beef cattle. Beef heifers (n = 480) were used in 2 studies to determine effects of oral tilmicosin on health and performance. In Exp. 1, 320 heifers (BW = 196 ± 3.3 kg) were administered antimicrobial metaphylaxis before shipment. At arrival they were monitored for signs of bovine respiratory disease. When 10% of the population was morbid, heifers were assigned to either a control receiving diet (CON) or a diet providing 12.5 mg of tilmicosin/kg of BW (TIL). Treatments were fed for 14 d, and morbid animals were treated with injectable antibiotics. Cattle were weighed individually on d 0, 28, and 56. Data were analyzed as a randomized complete block, and morbidity was analyzed as nonparametric data. Feeding TIL resulted in reduced BW at d 28 (P = 0.03). Moreover, TIL decreases DMI during the first 14 d (P = 0.0001) and decreased ADG (P = 0.03) and G:F (P = 0.05) from d 0 to 28. There were no differences in morbidity (P = 0.20), and TIL increased total antibiotic cost (P = 0.004). In Exp. 2, 160 beef heifers (BW = 227 ± 2.3 kg) received no metaphylaxis and were processed at arrival. Feeding TIL did not affect morbidity (P = 0.44); however, TIL decreased the number of animals re-treated (P = 0.03) and increased total antibiotic cost (P = 0.04).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
口服替米考星对新饲养肉牛健康和生产性能的影响
这些研究的目的是确定饲喂替米考星对新饲养肉牛的健康和生产性能的影响。在两项研究中,用480头肉牛来确定口服替米考星对健康和生产性能的影响。试验1,320头小母牛(体重= 196±3.3 kg)在装运前进行了抗微生物过敏反应。抵达后对它们进行了监测,看是否有牛呼吸道疾病的迹象。当10%的母牛发病时,将母牛分为饲喂对照日粮(CON)和饲喂每公斤体重12.5 mg替尔米科星(TIL)的日粮。饲养14 d,发病动物注射抗生素。牛分别在0、28和56岁时称重。数据作为随机完整块进行分析,发病率作为非参数数据进行分析。饲喂TIL导致28 d体重降低(P = 0.03)。此外,TIL降低了前14 d的DMI (P = 0.0001),降低了0 ~ 28 d的ADG (P = 0.03)和G:F (P = 0.05)。两组发病率无差异(P = 0.20), TIL增加了抗生素总费用(P = 0.004)。在试验2中,160头肉牛(体重227±2.3 kg)未发生过敏反应,并在抵达时进行处理。饲喂TIL对发病率无影响(P = 0.44);然而,TIL降低了再处理动物的数量(P = 0.03),增加了抗生素总成本(P = 0.04)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Case Study: Effect of exercise programs during receiving in a commercial feedlot on behavior and productivity of Brahman crossbred calves: Results from a commercial environment and a comparison to the research environment Effects of field pea supplementation on digestibility and rumen volatile fatty acid concentrations of beef-cattle diets containing high and low quality forages Enteric nitrous oxide emissions from beef cattle Invited Review: Detection and management of pregnancy loss in the cow herd1 Review: Sperm: Comparative morphology and function related to altered reproductive strategies and fertility in mammals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1