The politics of infrastructural aesthetics: a case of Delhi’s Bus Rapid Transit corridor

IF 1.5 4区 社会学 Q3 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES International Development Planning Review Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI:10.3828/IDPR.2020.21
T. Oommen, Ryan Sequeira
{"title":"The politics of infrastructural aesthetics: a case of Delhi’s Bus Rapid Transit corridor","authors":"T. Oommen, Ryan Sequeira","doi":"10.3828/IDPR.2020.21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper studies how transportation infrastructure projects are dependent on making aesthetic arguments through form, space and experience. It does this through a discourse analysis of the media coverage of the Delhi Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) corridor. Tracing the planning history of the BRT, it explores how it was construed as ineffective, expensive and dangerous. Deconstructing the BRT discourse, the authors make two propositions about the politics of transport infrastructure; its truth claims must be aesthetic arguments, and transformational agendas must be coupled with a distinctive aesthetic. The paper concludes by suggesting that a renewed and situated understanding of aesthetics is critical for urban practitioners, especially in the global South.","PeriodicalId":46625,"journal":{"name":"International Development Planning Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Development Planning Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3828/IDPR.2020.21","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper studies how transportation infrastructure projects are dependent on making aesthetic arguments through form, space and experience. It does this through a discourse analysis of the media coverage of the Delhi Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) corridor. Tracing the planning history of the BRT, it explores how it was construed as ineffective, expensive and dangerous. Deconstructing the BRT discourse, the authors make two propositions about the politics of transport infrastructure; its truth claims must be aesthetic arguments, and transformational agendas must be coupled with a distinctive aesthetic. The paper concludes by suggesting that a renewed and situated understanding of aesthetics is critical for urban practitioners, especially in the global South.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基础设施美学的政治:以德里快速公交走廊为例
本文研究了交通基础设施项目如何依赖于从形式、空间和体验三个方面进行美学论证。它通过对德里快速公交(BRT)走廊的媒体报道的话语分析来做到这一点。本书追溯了BRT的规划历史,探讨了BRT是如何被解读为无效、昂贵和危险的。解构BRT话语,作者提出了两个关于交通基础设施政治的命题;它的真理主张必须是美学论证,转型议程必须与独特的美学相结合。本文的结论是,对美学的更新和定位理解对城市实践者至关重要,特别是在全球南方。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
6.20%
发文量
15
期刊介绍: International Development Planning Review’s editorial policy is to reflect international development planning policy and practice. This includes a focus on the physical, economic and social conditions of urban and rural populations. The journal explores current national and international policy agendas, achievements and strategies in this area, offering material of interest to its established academic and professional readership as well as to a broader critical audience.
期刊最新文献
The politics of Africa’s urban–industrialisation: authoritarian centralisation and policy integration Picture this! Vulnerable women’s perspectives on SDGs prioritisation The geography of women’s informal entrepreneurial activities in urban Zambia: place, mobility and locational decision-making Community perception of climate events as a security issue: the case of Hatiya Island, Bangladesh Development beyond 2030: more collaboration, less competition?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1