Managing diabetes mellitus in underserved subjects of Western China using a telemedicine system— A clinical trial

Ya Li, Weiguo Ma, Jiao Bai, Chuanqing Xie, Yuanyuan Huo
{"title":"Managing diabetes mellitus in underserved subjects of Western China using a telemedicine system— A clinical trial","authors":"Ya Li, Weiguo Ma, Jiao Bai, Chuanqing Xie, Yuanyuan Huo","doi":"10.30564/JER.V1I1.671","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of Internet and telephone-based telemedicine system managing on patients’ glycemic index, blood pressure, and lipid level control in underserved subjects with type 2 diabetes in Western China. Research designs and methods: In a 3 years, randomized, controlled, single-blind, parallel-group treat-to-target study, 412 subjects with type 2 diabetes were randomized to telemedicine (Tel; n =208) group and usual care (control; n =204) group. We evaluated the effects of the intervention on blood sugar, blood pressure, and lipid levels at 1, 2, 3 years point, and investigated the cause of the loss during follow-up by phone call.Results: Intra-group comparison: in the Tel group, the FBS, 2HPG, HbA1c, and SBP at 1, 2, 3 years and DBP, TC, TG, BMI at 2, 3 years were significantly decreased compared with baseline level  (P<0.05). Moreover, the Tel group had an obvious better control of their HbA1c  at 2 and 3 years and 2HPG  at 3 years of follow-up respectively compared with the outcomes at 1 year (P<0.05).Inter-group comparison: the FBS, 2HPG, and HbA1c of Tel group decreased significantly from the baseline to the 1 year more than those of control group (P<0.05 or P<0.01 ). In this analysis, all clinical measures of Tel group had a significant downward compared with the outcomes of Control group  at 2 years, the FBS, HbA1c and BMI (P<0.001), the 2HPG and SBP (P<0.01) and DBP, TC, and TG (P<0.05) were statistically significant respectively. Logistic regression analysis showed that the subject loss during follow-up was associated with worse diabetes management (OR=3.842), low income (OR=3.201), low education level (OR=0.923), and greater distance to the hospital (OR=0.921).Conclusions: The study results indicated that the telemedicine may be a useful tool for managing diabetes mellitus.","PeriodicalId":92667,"journal":{"name":"Journal of endocrinology and thyroid research","volume":"43 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of endocrinology and thyroid research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30564/JER.V1I1.671","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of Internet and telephone-based telemedicine system managing on patients’ glycemic index, blood pressure, and lipid level control in underserved subjects with type 2 diabetes in Western China. Research designs and methods: In a 3 years, randomized, controlled, single-blind, parallel-group treat-to-target study, 412 subjects with type 2 diabetes were randomized to telemedicine (Tel; n =208) group and usual care (control; n =204) group. We evaluated the effects of the intervention on blood sugar, blood pressure, and lipid levels at 1, 2, 3 years point, and investigated the cause of the loss during follow-up by phone call.Results: Intra-group comparison: in the Tel group, the FBS, 2HPG, HbA1c, and SBP at 1, 2, 3 years and DBP, TC, TG, BMI at 2, 3 years were significantly decreased compared with baseline level  (P<0.05). Moreover, the Tel group had an obvious better control of their HbA1c  at 2 and 3 years and 2HPG  at 3 years of follow-up respectively compared with the outcomes at 1 year (P<0.05).Inter-group comparison: the FBS, 2HPG, and HbA1c of Tel group decreased significantly from the baseline to the 1 year more than those of control group (P<0.05 or P<0.01 ). In this analysis, all clinical measures of Tel group had a significant downward compared with the outcomes of Control group  at 2 years, the FBS, HbA1c and BMI (P<0.001), the 2HPG and SBP (P<0.01) and DBP, TC, and TG (P<0.05) were statistically significant respectively. Logistic regression analysis showed that the subject loss during follow-up was associated with worse diabetes management (OR=3.842), low income (OR=3.201), low education level (OR=0.923), and greater distance to the hospital (OR=0.921).Conclusions: The study results indicated that the telemedicine may be a useful tool for managing diabetes mellitus.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用远程医疗系统管理中国西部服务不足人群中的糖尿病-一项临床试验
目的:评价基于网络和电话的远程医疗系统对中国西部地区服务不足的2型糖尿病患者血糖指数、血压和血脂水平控制的效果。研究设计和方法:在一项为期3年的随机、对照、单盲、平行组治疗-目标研究中,412名2型糖尿病患者随机接受远程医疗(Tel;N =208)组和常规护理组(对照组;N =204)组。我们评估了干预在1、2、3年时对血糖、血压和血脂水平的影响,并通过电话随访调查了损失的原因。结果:组内比较:Tel组1、2、3年时FBS、2HPG、HbA1c、SBP及2、3年时DBP、TC、TG、BMI均较基线水平显著降低(P<0.05)。Tel组患者随访2年、3年的HbA1c、3年的2HPG控制均明显优于随访1年(P<0.05)。组间比较:Tel组FBS、2HPG、HbA1c自基线至1年显著低于对照组(P<0.05或P<0.01)。本分析中,Tel组患者2年时各项临床指标均较对照组显著下降,FBS、HbA1c、BMI (P<0.001), 2HPG、SBP (P<0.01), DBP、TC、TG (P<0.05)均有统计学意义。Logistic回归分析显示,随访期间受试者丢失与糖尿病管理较差(OR=3.842)、收入较低(OR=3.201)、文化程度较低(OR=0.923)、距离医院较远(OR=0.921)相关。结论:远程医疗是治疗糖尿病的一种有效手段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Ectopic Thyroid with Multinodular Goiter-Case Report Cortisol Response in Breast Cancer: The Role of Physical Activity and Exercise Evaluating the Effect of Irisin on Obesity-Concerning Physical Activity Do Endocrinopathies Differ in Most Prevalent Hemoglobinopathy of Middle East: Beta-thalassemia? Histopathological Characteristics of Folliculo-stellate Cells in Pituitary Glands of Wild Type, Obese and High-fat Diet Induced Mice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1