Characterization and Analysis of Porosity and Pore Structures

1区 地球科学 Q1 Earth and Planetary Sciences Reviews in Mineralogy & Geochemistry Pub Date : 2015-01-01 DOI:10.2138/RMG.2015.80.04
L. Anovitz, D. Cole
{"title":"Characterization and Analysis of Porosity and Pore Structures","authors":"L. Anovitz, D. Cole","doi":"10.2138/RMG.2015.80.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Porosity plays a clearly important role in geology. It controls fluid storage in aquifers, oil and gas fields and geothermal systems, and the extent and connectivity of the pore structure control fluid flow and transport through geological formations, as well as the relationship between the properties of individual minerals and the bulk properties of the rock. In order to quantify the relationships between porosity, storage, transport and rock properties, however, the pore structure must be measured and quantitatively described. The overall importance of porosity, at least with respect to the use of rocks as building stone was recognized by TS Hunt in his “Chemical and Geological Essays” (1875, reviewed by JD Dana 1875) who noted: > “Other things being equal, it may properly be said that the value of a stone for building purposes is inversely as its porosity or absorbing power.” In a Geological Survey report prepared for the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission, Manger (1963) summarized porosity and bulk density measurements for sedimentary rocks. He tabulated more than 900 items of porosity and bulk density data for sedimentary rocks with up to 2,109 porosity determinations per item. Amongst these he summarized several early studies, including those of Schwarz (1870–1871), Cook (1878), Wheeler (1896), Buckley (1898), Gary (1898), Moore (1904), Fuller (1906), Sorby (1908), Hirschwald (1912), Grubenmann et al. (1915), and Kessler (1919), many of which were concerned with rocks and clays of commercial utility. There have, of course, been many more such determinations since that time. There are a large number of methods for quantifying porosity, and an increasingly complex idea of what it means to do so. Manger (1963) listed the techniques by which the porosity determinations he summarized were made. He separated these into seven methods for …","PeriodicalId":49624,"journal":{"name":"Reviews in Mineralogy & Geochemistry","volume":"29 1","pages":"61-164"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"792","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reviews in Mineralogy & Geochemistry","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2138/RMG.2015.80.04","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 792

Abstract

Porosity plays a clearly important role in geology. It controls fluid storage in aquifers, oil and gas fields and geothermal systems, and the extent and connectivity of the pore structure control fluid flow and transport through geological formations, as well as the relationship between the properties of individual minerals and the bulk properties of the rock. In order to quantify the relationships between porosity, storage, transport and rock properties, however, the pore structure must be measured and quantitatively described. The overall importance of porosity, at least with respect to the use of rocks as building stone was recognized by TS Hunt in his “Chemical and Geological Essays” (1875, reviewed by JD Dana 1875) who noted: > “Other things being equal, it may properly be said that the value of a stone for building purposes is inversely as its porosity or absorbing power.” In a Geological Survey report prepared for the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission, Manger (1963) summarized porosity and bulk density measurements for sedimentary rocks. He tabulated more than 900 items of porosity and bulk density data for sedimentary rocks with up to 2,109 porosity determinations per item. Amongst these he summarized several early studies, including those of Schwarz (1870–1871), Cook (1878), Wheeler (1896), Buckley (1898), Gary (1898), Moore (1904), Fuller (1906), Sorby (1908), Hirschwald (1912), Grubenmann et al. (1915), and Kessler (1919), many of which were concerned with rocks and clays of commercial utility. There have, of course, been many more such determinations since that time. There are a large number of methods for quantifying porosity, and an increasingly complex idea of what it means to do so. Manger (1963) listed the techniques by which the porosity determinations he summarized were made. He separated these into seven methods for …
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
孔隙度和孔隙结构的表征与分析
孔隙度在地质学中起着明显的重要作用。它控制着含水层、油气田和地热系统中的流体储存,孔隙结构的程度和连通性控制着流体在地质构造中的流动和输送,以及单个矿物的性质与岩石的总体性质之间的关系。然而,为了量化孔隙度、储存、运输和岩石性质之间的关系,必须对孔隙结构进行测量和定量描述。TS Hunt在他的《化学与地质论文》(1875年,由JD Dana在1875年评论)中承认了孔隙度的总体重要性,他指出:“在其他条件相同的情况下,可以恰当地说,石头用于建筑目的的价值与它的孔隙度或吸收能力相反。”在为美国原子能委员会准备的一份地质调查报告中,Manger(1963)总结了沉积岩的孔隙度和体积密度测量。他为沉积岩制作了900多项孔隙度和体积密度数据,每项数据多达2109项孔隙度测定。其中,他总结了几项早期研究,包括Schwarz(1870-1871)、Cook(1878)、Wheeler(1896)、Buckley(1898)、Gary(1898)、Moore(1904)、Fuller(1906)、Sorby(1908)、Hirschwald(1912)、Grubenmann等人(1915)和Kessler(1919)的研究,其中许多研究都与商业用途的岩石和粘土有关。当然,从那时起,有更多这样的决定。有大量的方法可以量化孔隙度,而量化孔隙度的含义也越来越复杂。Manger(1963)列出了他所总结的测定孔隙度的技术。他将这些方法分为七种方法……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Reviews in Mineralogy & Geochemistry
Reviews in Mineralogy & Geochemistry 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
期刊介绍: RiMG is a series of multi-authored, soft-bound volumes containing concise reviews of the literature and advances in theoretical and/or applied mineralogy, crystallography, petrology, and geochemistry. The content of each volume consists of fully developed text which can be used for self-study, research, or as a text-book for graduate-level courses. RiMG volumes are typically produced in conjunction with a short course but can also be published without a short course. The series is jointly published by the Mineralogical Society of America (MSA) and the Geochemical Society.
期刊最新文献
Triple Oxygen Isotope Variations in Earth’s Crust Why Measure 17O? Historical Perspective, Triple-Isotope Systematics and Selected Applications Isotopic Traces of Atmospheric O2 in Rocks, Minerals, and Melts Triple Oxygen Isotopes in Silica–Water and Carbonate–Water Systems Climbing to the Top of Mount Fuji: Uniting Theory and Observations of Oxygen Triple Isotope Systematics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1