The weaponization of private corporate infrastructure: Internet fragmentation and coercive diplomacy in the 21st century

IF 3.2 2区 文学 Q1 COMMUNICATION Global Media and China Pub Date : 2022-11-12 DOI:10.1177/20594364221139729
Juan Ortiz Freuler
{"title":"The weaponization of private corporate infrastructure: Internet fragmentation and coercive diplomacy in the 21st century","authors":"Juan Ortiz Freuler","doi":"10.1177/20594364221139729","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the early 1990s, US leaders promoted the internet as post-nation “global information infrastructure.” However, throughout the 2000s, critical internet infrastructure became centralized under the tight control of a handful of US-based multinational companies. This paper examines the US government’s willingness to leverage its regulatory control over privately run critical infrastructure to exercise massive internet surveillance (pulling information from sovereign states), massive influence campaigns (pushing information into sovereign states), and, increasingly, to levy unilateral cyber-sanctions on other sovereign states (cutting information flows through blockages and digital lock-outs). The US government is now asserting its territorial sovereignty over what it had presented as global infrastructure in order to advance its narrow national goals. I argue that the weaponization of corporate internet infrastructure by the US government marks a new era of internet governance and is one of the key drivers of what is often discussed as internet fragmentation in internet governance forums.","PeriodicalId":42637,"journal":{"name":"Global Media and China","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Media and China","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20594364221139729","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

In the early 1990s, US leaders promoted the internet as post-nation “global information infrastructure.” However, throughout the 2000s, critical internet infrastructure became centralized under the tight control of a handful of US-based multinational companies. This paper examines the US government’s willingness to leverage its regulatory control over privately run critical infrastructure to exercise massive internet surveillance (pulling information from sovereign states), massive influence campaigns (pushing information into sovereign states), and, increasingly, to levy unilateral cyber-sanctions on other sovereign states (cutting information flows through blockages and digital lock-outs). The US government is now asserting its territorial sovereignty over what it had presented as global infrastructure in order to advance its narrow national goals. I argue that the weaponization of corporate internet infrastructure by the US government marks a new era of internet governance and is one of the key drivers of what is often discussed as internet fragmentation in internet governance forums.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
私营企业基础设施的武器化:21世纪的互联网碎片化和强制外交
上世纪90年代初,美国领导人将互联网推广为后国家时代的“全球信息基础设施”。然而,在整个21世纪,关键的互联网基础设施在少数美国跨国公司的严格控制下集中起来。本文考察了美国政府是否愿意利用其对私营关键基础设施的监管控制来实施大规模互联网监控(从主权国家获取信息)、大规模影响运动(将信息推入主权国家),以及越来越多地对其他主权国家实施单边网络制裁(通过封锁和数字锁定切断信息流)。为了推进其狭隘的国家目标,美国政府现在正在对其所谓的全球基础设施主张领土主权。我认为,美国政府将企业互联网基础设施武器化标志着互联网治理的新时代,也是互联网治理论坛上经常讨论的互联网碎片化问题的关键驱动因素之一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Global Media and China
Global Media and China COMMUNICATION-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
14.30%
发文量
29
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Book Review: Psychophysiological Measurement and Meaning: Cognitive and Emotional Processing of Media Performing fear in television production: Practices of an illiberal democracy Analyzing drivers of attitudes toward machine video news: A Xinhua Zhiyun case study The history of Huawei in Italy through the lens of corporate nationality The gilded cage: Technology, Development, and State Capitalism in China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1