Perceptions After Completing the Degree: A Qualitative Case Study of Select Higher Education Doctoral Graduates

Q2 Social Sciences International Journal of Doctoral Studies Pub Date : 2020-06-17 DOI:10.28945/4572
Meredith L Conrey, G. Roberts, Melissa R Fadler, Matias M Garza, Clifford V Johnson, Misty Rasmussen
{"title":"Perceptions After Completing the Degree: A Qualitative Case Study of Select Higher Education Doctoral Graduates","authors":"Meredith L Conrey, G. Roberts, Melissa R Fadler, Matias M Garza, Clifford V Johnson, Misty Rasmussen","doi":"10.28945/4572","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim/Purpose: Limited research exists on the perceived value that a doctoral degree has on higher education administrators’ goals; therefore, this collective case study had two purposes. The first was to assess qualitatively the perceptions of four doctorate-holding higher education administrators to explore the potential value associated with their degrees, and the second was to determine whether they perceived that their degree attainments influenced the achievement of their professional goals, if at all.\n\nBackground: Understanding goal attainment and the value associated with obtaining a doctoral degree is important to recognize the needs of doctoral students and to inform how to support degree-seeking professionals in achieving their professional goals. Building upon the conceptual model of doctoral value, as defined by Bryan and Guccione (2018), the researchers also utilized Becker’s (1964) human capital theory as the framework for understanding the perceptions of select administrative professionals who have completed their doctoral degrees in higher education.\n\nMethodology: Because this was a collective case study, four doctorate-holding higher education administrators were selected, through convenience sampling, to engage in a formal semi-structured face-to-face interview. Interview responses were evaluated using ethnographic analysis (i.e., domain analysis, taxonomic analysis, and componential analysis).\n\nContribution: Findings from this research can be used to better understand the perceptions of graduates who earned a doctoral degree in education, particularly with an increase in the number of doctoral degrees in that field. The results from this study align with findings from previous studies. \n\nFindings: The ethnographic analysis of the data indicated that the administrators perceived their doctoral degree as a way to advance professionally (e.g., career opportunities and research publication) and as a way to improve personally (e.g., increased confidence and becoming a role model). Two domains emerged: attainment of goals and perceptions of doctoral degree value. The taxonomic analysis revealed that the attainment of goals included personal and professional goals. Lastly, the componential analysis led to the discovery of nine attributes associated with obtaining a doctoral degree.\n\nRecommendations for Practitioners: Administrators in higher education degree programs should understand the needs of their students while they are participating in doctoral studies. By knowing what doctoral students expect to gain after obtaining a doctoral degree, doctoral-program administrators might consider tailoring courses and support programs to meet doctoral student needs.\n\nRecommendation for Researchers: Additional longitudinal studies should be undertaken to understand better how doctoral graduates view the value of their degree many years later. Do their perceptions change over time, or are they solidified?\n\nImpact on Society: With an increasing number of individuals obtaining doctoral degrees in higher education, departments, colleges, and universities need to understand whether graduates find that their degree has been useful. Because there is a demand for agencies to emphasize skills and work-related training, the perceived value of the degree can inform policymakers on changes in curriculum and programming to increase the perceived value of the doctoral degree.\n\nFuture Research: Future research should expand upon the number of students who are interviewed, and students in other academic programs may be interviewed to understand similarities and differences. Longitudinal studies should be conducted to understand if the perception of degree value changes over time.\n\n","PeriodicalId":53524,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Doctoral Studies","volume":"10 1","pages":"305-327"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Doctoral Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.28945/4572","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Aim/Purpose: Limited research exists on the perceived value that a doctoral degree has on higher education administrators’ goals; therefore, this collective case study had two purposes. The first was to assess qualitatively the perceptions of four doctorate-holding higher education administrators to explore the potential value associated with their degrees, and the second was to determine whether they perceived that their degree attainments influenced the achievement of their professional goals, if at all. Background: Understanding goal attainment and the value associated with obtaining a doctoral degree is important to recognize the needs of doctoral students and to inform how to support degree-seeking professionals in achieving their professional goals. Building upon the conceptual model of doctoral value, as defined by Bryan and Guccione (2018), the researchers also utilized Becker’s (1964) human capital theory as the framework for understanding the perceptions of select administrative professionals who have completed their doctoral degrees in higher education. Methodology: Because this was a collective case study, four doctorate-holding higher education administrators were selected, through convenience sampling, to engage in a formal semi-structured face-to-face interview. Interview responses were evaluated using ethnographic analysis (i.e., domain analysis, taxonomic analysis, and componential analysis). Contribution: Findings from this research can be used to better understand the perceptions of graduates who earned a doctoral degree in education, particularly with an increase in the number of doctoral degrees in that field. The results from this study align with findings from previous studies. Findings: The ethnographic analysis of the data indicated that the administrators perceived their doctoral degree as a way to advance professionally (e.g., career opportunities and research publication) and as a way to improve personally (e.g., increased confidence and becoming a role model). Two domains emerged: attainment of goals and perceptions of doctoral degree value. The taxonomic analysis revealed that the attainment of goals included personal and professional goals. Lastly, the componential analysis led to the discovery of nine attributes associated with obtaining a doctoral degree. Recommendations for Practitioners: Administrators in higher education degree programs should understand the needs of their students while they are participating in doctoral studies. By knowing what doctoral students expect to gain after obtaining a doctoral degree, doctoral-program administrators might consider tailoring courses and support programs to meet doctoral student needs. Recommendation for Researchers: Additional longitudinal studies should be undertaken to understand better how doctoral graduates view the value of their degree many years later. Do their perceptions change over time, or are they solidified? Impact on Society: With an increasing number of individuals obtaining doctoral degrees in higher education, departments, colleges, and universities need to understand whether graduates find that their degree has been useful. Because there is a demand for agencies to emphasize skills and work-related training, the perceived value of the degree can inform policymakers on changes in curriculum and programming to increase the perceived value of the doctoral degree. Future Research: Future research should expand upon the number of students who are interviewed, and students in other academic programs may be interviewed to understand similarities and differences. Longitudinal studies should be conducted to understand if the perception of degree value changes over time.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
完成学位后的认知:部分高等教育博士毕业生的定性案例研究
目的:博士学位对高等教育管理者目标的感知价值研究有限;因此,这个集体案例研究有两个目的。第一个是对四名拥有博士学位的高等教育管理人员的看法进行定性评估,以探索与他们的学位相关的潜在价值,第二个是确定他们是否认为他们的学位成就影响了他们的职业目标的实现,如果有的话。背景:了解目标的实现和与获得博士学位相关的价值对于认识博士生的需求和告知如何支持攻读学位的专业人员实现他们的职业目标是很重要的。在Bryan和Guccione(2018)定义的博士价值概念模型的基础上,研究人员还利用Becker(1964)的人力资本理论作为框架,来理解在高等教育中完成博士学位的特定行政专业人员的看法。方法:由于这是一个集体案例研究,通过方便抽样,选择了四名持有博士学位的高等教育管理人员进行正式的半结构化面对面访谈。访谈回应使用人种学分析(即领域分析、分类分析和成分分析)进行评估。贡献:本研究的结果可以用来更好地理解获得教育博士学位的毕业生的看法,特别是在该领域博士学位数量增加的情况下。这项研究的结果与以前的研究结果一致。研究发现:对数据的民族志分析表明,管理人员认为他们的博士学位是一种专业进步的方式(例如,职业机会和研究发表),也是一种提高个人素质的方式(例如,增加信心和成为榜样)。出现了两个领域:实现目标和对博士学位价值的看法。分类学分析表明,目标的实现包括个人目标和职业目标。最后,成分分析发现了与获得博士学位相关的九个属性。对从业人员的建议:高等教育学位课程的管理人员应该了解他们的学生在参与博士研究时的需求。通过了解博士生在获得博士学位后期望获得什么,博士项目的管理者可能会考虑调整课程和支持项目,以满足博士生的需求。对研究人员的建议:应该进行额外的纵向研究,以更好地了解博士毕业生多年后如何看待其学位的价值。他们的观念是随着时间的推移而改变,还是已经固化?对社会的影响:随着越来越多的人在高等教育中获得博士学位,院系、学院和大学需要了解毕业生是否发现他们的学位是有用的。由于机构需要强调技能和与工作相关的培训,学位的感知价值可以告知政策制定者改变课程和规划,以增加博士学位的感知价值。未来的研究:未来的研究应该扩大接受采访的学生的数量,其他学术项目的学生可能会接受采访,以了解异同。应进行纵向研究,以了解程度值的感知是否随时间而变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Doctoral Studies
International Journal of Doctoral Studies Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊最新文献
A Framework of Rhetorical Moves Designed to Scaffold the Research Proposal Development Process What Does It Mean To Be a Resilient Student? An Explorative Study of Doctoral Students’ Resilience and Coping Strategies Using Grounded Theory as the Analytic Lens PhD by Prospective Publication in Australian Business Schools: Provocations from a Collaborative Autoethnography Mitigating Ceiling Effects in a Longitudinal Study of Doctoral Engineering Student Stress and Persistence Into the Challenges of Aligning Key Sections of Doctoral Dissertations: Cognitive Analysis, Pedagogical Tools, and Instrument Development
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1