Comparison of the approach to determination of the rotation period of forest stands in the Czech Republic and in the Slovak Republic

IF 1.1 Q3 FORESTRY Journal of forest science Pub Date : 2022-10-14 DOI:10.17221/107/2022-jfs
Michaela Korená Hillayová, K. Holušová, Klára Báliková, J. Holécy
{"title":"Comparison of the approach to determination of the rotation period of forest stands in the Czech Republic and in the Slovak Republic","authors":"Michaela Korená Hillayová, K. Holušová, Klára Báliková, J. Holécy","doi":"10.17221/107/2022-jfs","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The exact determination of the rotation period is still a current and important essential issue of forestry. It attracts the attention of forest economists, managers and owners worldwide, not only of forest economists but also of forest managers. The rotation period is defined by physical, technical or financial parameters of forest management. Therefore, it is necessary to distinguish between the biological and the economic optimal rotation period. A fundamental challenge in forest management is the need for appropriate determination of the rotation period. The primary interest of our research was to compare the effective legislation for the determination of the rotation period in the Czech Republic and in the Slovak Republic. Scientific methods such as document analysis and questionnaire survey were applied. The results of the legislation analysis and other related documents were compared with the expert opinions of the relevant stakeholders. Those who affect the decision process related to the problem and those where are “affected” by the problem were involved in the study. Results show that respondents do not agree with the regulation of rotation period according to effective law. Moreover, they consider it as not usable as the conditions in forest ecosystems have changed recently, which is not considered in the legislation.","PeriodicalId":16011,"journal":{"name":"Journal of forest science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of forest science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17221/107/2022-jfs","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The exact determination of the rotation period is still a current and important essential issue of forestry. It attracts the attention of forest economists, managers and owners worldwide, not only of forest economists but also of forest managers. The rotation period is defined by physical, technical or financial parameters of forest management. Therefore, it is necessary to distinguish between the biological and the economic optimal rotation period. A fundamental challenge in forest management is the need for appropriate determination of the rotation period. The primary interest of our research was to compare the effective legislation for the determination of the rotation period in the Czech Republic and in the Slovak Republic. Scientific methods such as document analysis and questionnaire survey were applied. The results of the legislation analysis and other related documents were compared with the expert opinions of the relevant stakeholders. Those who affect the decision process related to the problem and those where are “affected” by the problem were involved in the study. Results show that respondents do not agree with the regulation of rotation period according to effective law. Moreover, they consider it as not usable as the conditions in forest ecosystems have changed recently, which is not considered in the legislation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
捷克共和国和斯洛伐克共和国确定森林林分轮作期方法的比较
轮作期的确切确定仍然是当前林业的一个重要的基本问题。它引起了全世界森林经济学家、管理者和所有者的注意,不仅是森林经济学家,而且是森林管理者。轮调期由森林管理的物理、技术或财务参数确定。因此,有必要区分生物和经济最优轮作期。森林管理的一个基本挑战是需要适当地确定轮作期。我们研究的主要兴趣是比较捷克共和国和斯洛伐克共和国确定轮换期的有效立法。采用文献分析、问卷调查等科学方法。将立法分析和其他相关文件的结果与相关利益相关者的专家意见进行比较。那些影响与问题相关的决策过程的人和那些被问题“影响”的人都参与了这项研究。结果显示,受访者不同意根据有效法律规定轮换期。此外,他们认为,由于森林生态系统的条件最近发生了变化,因此无法使用,这一点在立法中没有考虑到。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
48
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Original results of basic and applied research from all fields of forestry related to European forest ecosystems and their functions including those in the landscape and wood production chain are published in original scientific papers, short communications and review articles. Papers are published in English
期刊最新文献
Change in forest species composition and its projections into the economy of forest owners Over- and under-bark volume estimation of European larch timber produced by mechanised harvesting in Czechia Overgrazing strongly impedes the natural regeneration of the endemic Boswellia species on Socotra Island Innovations in the methodological approach to quantifying and evaluating the supported effects of forests for recreational and educational ecosystem services Calculation and operational assessment of tyre contact areas in the tractor-and-trailer unit
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1