Relationship between the febrile seizures in children and complete blood count inflammatory indices

Mohammed Hassan, A. Elsayeh, M. Hassan
{"title":"Relationship between the febrile seizures in children and complete blood count inflammatory indices","authors":"Mohammed Hassan, A. Elsayeh, M. Hassan","doi":"10.4103/sjamf.sjamf_105_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background A lot of effort has been put in to identify the pathophysiology of febrile seizures (FS) in children, but it has not entirely caught on. Severity of inflammation and pattern of immune system stimulation are of apparent significance in FS pathogenesis among susceptible children. So, the role of subtypes of immune system cells (such as macrophages and lymphocytes) and inflammatory indices [such as red blood cell distribution width (RDW), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), mean platelet volume (MPV), and MPV/mean platelet count ratio (MPR)] in FS needs more evaluation. Objective To investigate the applicability of RDW, NLR, MPV, and MPR in children with FS. Patients and methods A sample of 50 children with FS and 50 age-matched and sex-matched controls (had a febrile illness without seizures) were sequentially enrolled in this work. Venous samples for complete blood count had been obtained within 2 h of FS, and then the values of RDW, NLR, MPV, and MPR were calculated, tabulated, and statistically analyzed in both groups. Results We noted that the raised NLR and MPR values were linked with raised likelihood of FS. The optimum cutoff values of NLR and MPR for FS probability were 1.25 and 0.024, whereas the area under the curve was 0.664 and 0.822, successively. The mean values of MPV were statistically significantly decreased in complex febrile seizure (CFS) when compared with simple febrile seizure (SFS). However, there was no significant statistical difference between CFS and SFS regarding NLR and MPR mean values. Furthermore, we found that there was no significant statistical difference regarding mean values of RDW either between FS and controls or between CFS and SFS. Conclusions Increased NLR and MPR values in FS support the hypothesis of white cell subset implication in FS generation, and our study guaranteed that MPV is a simple, but limited, indicator in distinguishing CFS from SFS.","PeriodicalId":22975,"journal":{"name":"The Scientific Journal of Al-Azhar Medical Faculty, Girls","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Scientific Journal of Al-Azhar Medical Faculty, Girls","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/sjamf.sjamf_105_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background A lot of effort has been put in to identify the pathophysiology of febrile seizures (FS) in children, but it has not entirely caught on. Severity of inflammation and pattern of immune system stimulation are of apparent significance in FS pathogenesis among susceptible children. So, the role of subtypes of immune system cells (such as macrophages and lymphocytes) and inflammatory indices [such as red blood cell distribution width (RDW), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), mean platelet volume (MPV), and MPV/mean platelet count ratio (MPR)] in FS needs more evaluation. Objective To investigate the applicability of RDW, NLR, MPV, and MPR in children with FS. Patients and methods A sample of 50 children with FS and 50 age-matched and sex-matched controls (had a febrile illness without seizures) were sequentially enrolled in this work. Venous samples for complete blood count had been obtained within 2 h of FS, and then the values of RDW, NLR, MPV, and MPR were calculated, tabulated, and statistically analyzed in both groups. Results We noted that the raised NLR and MPR values were linked with raised likelihood of FS. The optimum cutoff values of NLR and MPR for FS probability were 1.25 and 0.024, whereas the area under the curve was 0.664 and 0.822, successively. The mean values of MPV were statistically significantly decreased in complex febrile seizure (CFS) when compared with simple febrile seizure (SFS). However, there was no significant statistical difference between CFS and SFS regarding NLR and MPR mean values. Furthermore, we found that there was no significant statistical difference regarding mean values of RDW either between FS and controls or between CFS and SFS. Conclusions Increased NLR and MPR values in FS support the hypothesis of white cell subset implication in FS generation, and our study guaranteed that MPV is a simple, but limited, indicator in distinguishing CFS from SFS.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
儿童热性惊厥与全血细胞计数及炎症指标的关系
背景:在确定儿童热性惊厥(FS)的病理生理学方面已经付出了大量的努力,但还没有完全流行起来。炎症的严重程度和免疫系统刺激模式在易感儿童FS发病中具有明显意义。因此,免疫系统细胞亚型(如巨噬细胞和淋巴细胞)和炎症指标[如红细胞分布宽度(RDW)、中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)、平均血小板体积(MPV)、MPV/平均血小板计数比(MPR)]在FS中的作用有待进一步评估。目的探讨RDW、NLR、MPV和MPR在FS患儿中的适用性。患者和方法50例FS患儿和50例年龄匹配和性别匹配的对照组(有发热性疾病但无癫痫发作)依次入组。在FS后2 h内取静脉全血细胞计数,计算两组RDW、NLR、MPV、MPR值,制成表格,进行统计学分析。结果我们注意到NLR和MPR值的升高与FS的可能性升高有关。FS概率的最佳NLR和MPR截断值分别为1.25和0.024,曲线下面积分别为0.664和0.822。与单纯热性惊厥(SFS)相比,复杂热性惊厥(CFS)的MPV平均值有统计学意义的降低。然而,在NLR和MPR平均值方面,CFS和SFS之间没有显著的统计学差异。此外,我们发现无论是在FS和对照组之间,还是在CFS和SFS之间,RDW的平均值都没有显著的统计学差异。结论FS中NLR和MPR值的升高支持了白细胞亚群与FS产生相关的假设,本研究保证了MPV是区分CFS和SFS的一个简单但有限的指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of nanofat injection in postburn and post-traumatic facial scars Immunological markers changes in pediatric immune Thrombocytopenic Purpura Minimally invasive strabismus surgery versus paralimbal approach for horizontal strabismus surgery Clinical applications of brain diffusion-tensor imaging and fiber tractography Choroidal and retinal nerve fiber layer thicknesses in smokers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1