Comparison of body dimensions between normal and double muscled Senepol heifers

Q4 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Journal of Agriculture of The University of Puerto Rico Pub Date : 2021-04-05 DOI:10.46429/JAUPR.V101I1.14291
H. Sánchez, K. Domenech, Gerardo Rivera, M. Pagán, Américo Casas, P. Randel, Gladycia Muñiz
{"title":"Comparison of body dimensions between normal and double muscled Senepol heifers","authors":"H. Sánchez, K. Domenech, Gerardo Rivera, M. Pagán, Américo Casas, P. Randel, Gladycia Muñiz","doi":"10.46429/JAUPR.V101I1.14291","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Different body dimensions were compared between 16 normally muscled (NM) and 16 heterocygous double muscled (DM) Senepol heifers. Body weight (BW), withers height (WH), hip height (HH), thorarcic perimeter (TP), barrel (BA), shoulder to pin bone distance (SPD), and the internal pelvic width (PW), height (PH), and area (PA) were recorded in each heifer. Also included were the relationships of BW/body dimensions, except for dimensions PW and PH. Data were analyzed by the GLIMMIX and CORR procedures of SAS. The respective genotypes MN and DM did not differ (P>0.10) in BW (415 and 434 kg), WH (both 113 cm), HH (both 120 cm), TP (both 175 cm), B A (209 and 214 cm), B W/B A (1.99 and 2.03 kg/cm), SPD (both 147 cm), PW (both 13 cm), PA (212 and 220 cm2), and BW/PA (1.96 and 1.98 kg/cm2). However, DM heifers tended to present (P<0.10) higher values than NM heifers for BW/WH, BW/HH, BW/SPD, and PH by margins of 0.14 kg/cm, 0.15 kg/cm, 0.12 kg/cm, and 0.59 cm, respectively. Moreover, the BW/TP value was 0.09 kg/cm greater (P<0.05) in the DM than in NM heifers. The correlations between different pairs of body dimensions were lower in the DM than in the NM heifers. These results suggest that the enhanced musculature visually observed in DM heifers must be accompanied by hypotrophy of other body organs and tissues, but not including the pelvic region. This compensatory effect minimizes the posibility of observing differences in body dimensions in vivo between DM and NM heifers.","PeriodicalId":14937,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agriculture of The University of Puerto Rico","volume":"11 1","pages":"17-34"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Agriculture of The University of Puerto Rico","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46429/JAUPR.V101I1.14291","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Different body dimensions were compared between 16 normally muscled (NM) and 16 heterocygous double muscled (DM) Senepol heifers. Body weight (BW), withers height (WH), hip height (HH), thorarcic perimeter (TP), barrel (BA), shoulder to pin bone distance (SPD), and the internal pelvic width (PW), height (PH), and area (PA) were recorded in each heifer. Also included were the relationships of BW/body dimensions, except for dimensions PW and PH. Data were analyzed by the GLIMMIX and CORR procedures of SAS. The respective genotypes MN and DM did not differ (P>0.10) in BW (415 and 434 kg), WH (both 113 cm), HH (both 120 cm), TP (both 175 cm), B A (209 and 214 cm), B W/B A (1.99 and 2.03 kg/cm), SPD (both 147 cm), PW (both 13 cm), PA (212 and 220 cm2), and BW/PA (1.96 and 1.98 kg/cm2). However, DM heifers tended to present (P<0.10) higher values than NM heifers for BW/WH, BW/HH, BW/SPD, and PH by margins of 0.14 kg/cm, 0.15 kg/cm, 0.12 kg/cm, and 0.59 cm, respectively. Moreover, the BW/TP value was 0.09 kg/cm greater (P<0.05) in the DM than in NM heifers. The correlations between different pairs of body dimensions were lower in the DM than in the NM heifers. These results suggest that the enhanced musculature visually observed in DM heifers must be accompanied by hypotrophy of other body organs and tissues, but not including the pelvic region. This compensatory effect minimizes the posibility of observing differences in body dimensions in vivo between DM and NM heifers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
正常和双肌塞内波尔小母牛体型的比较
比较了16头正常肌型(NM)和16头杂合双肌型(DM)塞内波尔母牛的体尺差异。记录每头母牛的体重(BW)、肩高(WH)、臀高(HH)、胸围(TP)、胸围(BA)、肩钉骨距离(SPD)、骨盆内宽(PW)、高度(PH)和面积(PA)。除PW和ph外,还包括体重/身体尺寸的关系。数据通过SAS的GLIMMIX和CORR程序进行分析。基因型MN和DM在体重(415和434 kg)、WH(均为113 cm)、HH(均为120 cm)、TP(均为175 cm)、B A(209和214 cm)、BW/ B A(1.99和2.03 kg/cm)、SPD(均为147 cm)、PW(均为13 cm)、PA(212和220 cm)和BW/PA(1.96和1.98 kg/cm)方面均无显著差异(P < 0.05)。体重/WH、体重/HH、体重/SPD和PH值均显著高于普通母牛(P<0.10),分别高出0.14 kg/cm、0.15 kg/cm、0.12 kg/cm和0.59 cm。DM犊牛的体重/TP值比NM犊牛高0.09 kg/cm (P<0.05)。不同对体尺之间的相关性在DM母牛中低于NM母牛。这些结果表明,在DM小母牛中,视觉上观察到的肌肉组织增强必然伴随着其他身体器官和组织的萎缩,但不包括骨盆区域。这种代偿效应最大限度地降低了观察DM和NM母牛体内体型差异的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
64
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Agriculture of the University of Puerto Rico issued biannually by the Agricultural Experiment Station of the University of Puerto Rico, Mayagüez Campus, for the publication of articles and research notes by staff members or others, dealing with scientific agriculture in Puerto Rico and elsewhere in the Caribbean and Latin America.
期刊最新文献
Detection and incidence of pineapple heart rot disease caused by Phytophthora nicotianae in commercial farms of Puerto Rico Hurricanes and phytophagous insects: Disturbance effects on the abundance of an invasive insect Performance of sweet chili pepper (Capsicum chinense Jacq.) landraces in three agricultural zones of Puerto Rico Developmental and reproductive performance differences of the slick-hair Holstein HIGHER PLANTING DENSITY INCREASES YIELD OF SEMI-BUSH TROPICAL PUMPKIN
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1