Minimally invasive treatment of pilonidal sinus disease (a systematic review and meta-analysis)

S. B. Kozyreva, I. Kostarev, L. Blagodarny, V. V. Polovinkin, A. Zakharyan, A. Titov
{"title":"Minimally invasive treatment of pilonidal sinus disease (a systematic review and meta-analysis)","authors":"S. B. Kozyreva, I. Kostarev, L. Blagodarny, V. V. Polovinkin, A. Zakharyan, A. Titov","doi":"10.33878/2073-7556-2023-22-2-149-159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AIM: to estimate the effectiveness of minimally invasive methods for treatment of chronic inflammation in pilonidal sinus disease by systematic review.PATIENTS AND METHODS: fifty-two clinical trials were selected from 2,576 papers in databases for systematic review. It included the following methods: the fibrin glue, the sinusectomy, the video-assisted pilonidal sinus treatment, the laser coagulation and the chemical destruction using crystallized phenol or its solution. Regarding the last two methods, a meta-analysis was carried out.RESULTS: the meta-analysis demonstrated the high effectiveness of phenol and laser coagulation for pilonidal sinus disease. When comparing the results of phenol use and excisional techniques, there was a significant difference in higher frequency complications rate after excisional techniques (HR 0.42; 95% CI: 0.05–3.71), while the recurrence rate was the same (HR 0.98; 95% CI: 0.45–2.16). The probability of recurrence was significantly higher than after excision techniques in compare with SiLaC (HR 4.02; 95% CI: 1.13 14.3, p = 0.03). However, there was no significant differences in complication rate after SiLaC and excisional techniques (HR 0.63; 95% CI: 0.29–1.34).CONCLUSION: the chemical destruction and laser coagulation are the most effective methods for pilonidal sinus treatment.","PeriodicalId":17840,"journal":{"name":"Koloproktologia","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Koloproktologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33878/2073-7556-2023-22-2-149-159","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AIM: to estimate the effectiveness of minimally invasive methods for treatment of chronic inflammation in pilonidal sinus disease by systematic review.PATIENTS AND METHODS: fifty-two clinical trials were selected from 2,576 papers in databases for systematic review. It included the following methods: the fibrin glue, the sinusectomy, the video-assisted pilonidal sinus treatment, the laser coagulation and the chemical destruction using crystallized phenol or its solution. Regarding the last two methods, a meta-analysis was carried out.RESULTS: the meta-analysis demonstrated the high effectiveness of phenol and laser coagulation for pilonidal sinus disease. When comparing the results of phenol use and excisional techniques, there was a significant difference in higher frequency complications rate after excisional techniques (HR 0.42; 95% CI: 0.05–3.71), while the recurrence rate was the same (HR 0.98; 95% CI: 0.45–2.16). The probability of recurrence was significantly higher than after excision techniques in compare with SiLaC (HR 4.02; 95% CI: 1.13 14.3, p = 0.03). However, there was no significant differences in complication rate after SiLaC and excisional techniques (HR 0.63; 95% CI: 0.29–1.34).CONCLUSION: the chemical destruction and laser coagulation are the most effective methods for pilonidal sinus treatment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
微创治疗毛毛窦疾病(一项系统回顾和荟萃分析)
目的:通过系统回顾评价微创方法治疗毛窦慢性炎症的有效性。患者和方法:从数据库中2576篇论文中选择52项临床试验进行系统评价。包括纤维蛋白胶、鼻窦切除术、电视辅助治疗毛毛窦、激光凝固和结晶苯酚或其溶液化学破坏。对后两种方法进行meta分析。结果:荟萃分析显示苯酚和激光凝固治疗毛毛窦疾病的有效性。当比较使用苯酚和切除技术的结果时,切除技术后的高频并发症发生率有显著差异(HR 0.42;95% CI: 0.05 ~ 3.71),复发率相同(HR 0.98;95% ci: 0.45-2.16)。与SiLaC相比,手术后复发的概率明显高于手术后(HR 4.02;95% CI: 1.13 14.3, p = 0.03)。然而,SiLaC和切除技术的并发症发生率无显著差异(HR 0.63;95% ci: 0.29-1.34)。结论:化学破坏和激光凝固是治疗毛窦最有效的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
In the memory of professor Aleksandr S. Ermolov (90th birth remembrance) COMMENTS Vadim V. Polovinkin, Artem V. Volkov, Maria S. Yakovenko, Anna I. Demina The difficulties of differential diagnosis of Crohn’s disease and metastatic breast cancer (case report) COMMENTS Igor V. Matveev, Mikhail A. Danilov, Alexander V. Klimashevich, Arif K. Aallakhverdiev, Alexander V. Maksimenko, Anastasia M. Valieva Ileocecal resection with extended lymphadenectomy for localized cecal cancer Predictors of adverse outcomes of steroids in patients with severe ulcerative colitis (systematic review and meta-analyses) Tubular duplication of the sigmoid colon: clinical case
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1