Clinical profile, mortality and short term outcome in asphyxiated neonates treated with therapeutic hypothermia in limited-resource setting, a cohort study

Nilesh Jain, J. Prajapati, Pramila Ramawat, D. Singh
{"title":"Clinical profile, mortality and short term outcome in asphyxiated neonates treated with therapeutic hypothermia in limited-resource setting, a cohort study","authors":"Nilesh Jain, J. Prajapati, Pramila Ramawat, D. Singh","doi":"10.22038/IJN.2021.55472.2034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective :To evaluate the effectiveness of therapeutic hypothermia(TH) among asphyxiated newborns for reducing mortality, adverse clinical events, and short-term outcomes in comparison to asphyxiated newborns treated with standard therapy.\nMaterial and method: Non-randomised cohort study at the tertiary care center. Study population: Asphyxiated newborns admitted in NICU within 24 hrs of life meeting the lab and/or clinical criteria of Severe Birth Asphyxia. Eligible newborns who received TH were labeled as recipients and newborns who received standard care were labeled as non-recipient.\nResults: Out of 176 infants studied, 89 newborns received TH, and 87 newborns received standard care. Recipients of TH had 15.3% lower mortality than non-recipients (P<0.05). The incidence of adverse clinical events was similar among both groups. At discharge 73.2% among recipients vs 56.8% non recipients were neurologically normal( p=0.01). 92.6% among recipients vs 70.1% non recipients were able to breast feed (p<0.05), 30.4% of recipients vs 46.2% non-recipients required anti-epileptics(p<0.05).\nConclusion: TH is effective and feasible with a decrease in the rate of death, better neurological status at discharge, and less need for anti-epileptics without increasing adverse clinical events at limited-resource settings using low-cost devices.","PeriodicalId":14584,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Journal of Neonatology IJN","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Journal of Neonatology IJN","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22038/IJN.2021.55472.2034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective :To evaluate the effectiveness of therapeutic hypothermia(TH) among asphyxiated newborns for reducing mortality, adverse clinical events, and short-term outcomes in comparison to asphyxiated newborns treated with standard therapy. Material and method: Non-randomised cohort study at the tertiary care center. Study population: Asphyxiated newborns admitted in NICU within 24 hrs of life meeting the lab and/or clinical criteria of Severe Birth Asphyxia. Eligible newborns who received TH were labeled as recipients and newborns who received standard care were labeled as non-recipient. Results: Out of 176 infants studied, 89 newborns received TH, and 87 newborns received standard care. Recipients of TH had 15.3% lower mortality than non-recipients (P<0.05). The incidence of adverse clinical events was similar among both groups. At discharge 73.2% among recipients vs 56.8% non recipients were neurologically normal( p=0.01). 92.6% among recipients vs 70.1% non recipients were able to breast feed (p<0.05), 30.4% of recipients vs 46.2% non-recipients required anti-epileptics(p<0.05). Conclusion: TH is effective and feasible with a decrease in the rate of death, better neurological status at discharge, and less need for anti-epileptics without increasing adverse clinical events at limited-resource settings using low-cost devices.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在资源有限的环境下,治疗性低温治疗窒息新生儿的临床概况、死亡率和短期结果,一项队列研究
目的:评价治疗性低温(TH)在窒息新生儿中降低死亡率、不良临床事件和短期结果的有效性,并与标准治疗方法进行比较。材料和方法:三级保健中心的非随机队列研究。研究人群:出生后24小时内符合实验室和/或临床重度出生窒息标准的新生儿入住NICU。接受TH治疗的合格新生儿被标记为接受者,接受标准护理的新生儿被标记为非接受者。结果:在176名婴儿中,89名新生儿接受了TH治疗,87名新生儿接受了标准护理。接受TH治疗的患者死亡率比未接受TH治疗的患者低15.3% (P<0.05)。两组患者临床不良事件发生率相似。出院时,73.2%接受手术者神经功能正常,56.8%未接受手术者神经功能正常(p=0.01)。92.6%的接受者对70.1%的非接受者能够母乳喂养(p<0.05), 30.4%的接受者对46.2%的非接受者需要抗癫痫药物(p<0.05)。结论:在资源有限的情况下,使用低成本设备,TH有效可行,死亡率降低,出院时神经系统状态较好,抗癫痫药物需求减少,且不增加不良临床事件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Radiofrequency Ablation of Umbilical Cord for Reduction of Twin Reversed Arterial Perfusion Sequence: A Case Series Early-Onset Neonatal Sepsis: A Retrospective Study among 1,119 Moroccan Newborns Admitted to the National Reference Center in Neonatology and Nutrition, Rabat, Morocco Association of Neuregulin Levels and Neuregulin-1 Polymorphism with Short-term Morbidities in Preterm Neonates Caudal regression syndrome: A case report and literature of review Impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on health of preterm infants in Iran
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1