Do related party transactions affect earnings quality? Evidence from East Asia

Mohd Mohid Rahmat, Balachandran Muniandy, Kamran Ahmed
{"title":"Do related party transactions affect earnings quality? Evidence from East Asia","authors":"Mohd Mohid Rahmat, Balachandran Muniandy, Kamran Ahmed","doi":"10.1108/ijaim-12-2018-0146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this paper is to examine the effect of related party transactions (RPTs) and types of RPTs (complex, simple and loan) on earnings quality in four East Asian countries: Hong Kong, Malaysia, Singapore and Thailand.,RPTs and types of RPTs are measured using two approaches, magnitude and abnormal (magnitude change). Earnings quality is measured using proxies for accrual earnings management and identified as discretionary accruals (DAC) and performance matched discretional accruals (PMDAC).,The results suggest that firms in these countries experience poor earnings quality when they are engaged in RPT. The effect of RPT-simple on earnings quality is more severe than RPT-complex. However, the presence of higher investor protection and stricter enforcement of regulations in countries like Singapore and Hong Kong reduce the negative impact of RPTs on earnings quality.,The results support the argument that the presence of controlling shareholders in East Asia is likely to lead to engagement with RPTs, which will increase the likelihood of firms’ earnings manipulation via DAC. This study has two limitations. It only focuses on Hong Kong, Malaysia, Singapore and Thailand, and the results may not be generalizable to other countries. Second, this study only measures the magnitude and abnormal RPTs based on the disclosures available in annual reports.,This paper contributes to the literature by examining the effect of RPTs and types of RPTs on earnings quality in four selected East Asian countries.","PeriodicalId":46371,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Accounting and Information Management","volume":"16 1","pages":"147-166"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Accounting and Information Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijaim-12-2018-0146","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to examine the effect of related party transactions (RPTs) and types of RPTs (complex, simple and loan) on earnings quality in four East Asian countries: Hong Kong, Malaysia, Singapore and Thailand.,RPTs and types of RPTs are measured using two approaches, magnitude and abnormal (magnitude change). Earnings quality is measured using proxies for accrual earnings management and identified as discretionary accruals (DAC) and performance matched discretional accruals (PMDAC).,The results suggest that firms in these countries experience poor earnings quality when they are engaged in RPT. The effect of RPT-simple on earnings quality is more severe than RPT-complex. However, the presence of higher investor protection and stricter enforcement of regulations in countries like Singapore and Hong Kong reduce the negative impact of RPTs on earnings quality.,The results support the argument that the presence of controlling shareholders in East Asia is likely to lead to engagement with RPTs, which will increase the likelihood of firms’ earnings manipulation via DAC. This study has two limitations. It only focuses on Hong Kong, Malaysia, Singapore and Thailand, and the results may not be generalizable to other countries. Second, this study only measures the magnitude and abnormal RPTs based on the disclosures available in annual reports.,This paper contributes to the literature by examining the effect of RPTs and types of RPTs on earnings quality in four selected East Asian countries.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关联交易是否影响盈余质量?来自东亚的证据
本文的目的是研究在四个东亚国家:香港、马来西亚、新加坡和泰国,关联交易(RPTs)和关联交易类型(复杂、简单和贷款)对盈余质量的影响。rpt和rpt类型采用幅度和异常(幅度变化)两种方法测量。盈余质量是使用应计盈余管理的代理来衡量的,并确定为可操纵性应计利润(DAC)和业绩匹配的可操纵性应计利润(PMDAC)。结果表明,这些国家的公司在从事RPT时,其盈余质量较差。简单rpt对盈余质量的影响比复杂rpt更严重。然而,新加坡和香港等国家对投资者的保护程度更高,监管执行也更严格,这减少了rpt对盈利质量的负面影响。研究结果支持以下观点,即东亚地区控股股东的存在可能导致与rpt的接触,这将增加公司通过DAC操纵收益的可能性。这项研究有两个局限性。它只关注香港、马来西亚、新加坡和泰国,结果可能无法推广到其他国家。其次,本研究仅根据年度报告中披露的信息衡量rpt的大小和异常rpt。本文选取了四个东亚国家为研究对象,考察了rpt和rpt类型对盈余质量的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
3.00%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Accounting & Information Management focuses on publishing research in accounting, finance, and information management. It specifically emphasizes the interaction between these research areas on an international scale and within both the private and public sectors. The aim of the journal is to bridge the knowledge gap between researchers and practitioners by covering various issues that arise in the field. These include information systems, accounting information management, innovation and technology in accounting, accounting standards and reporting, and capital market efficiency.
期刊最新文献
Forward-looking disclosure tone in the chairman’s statement: obfuscation or truthful explanations Do shareholders appreciate the audit committee and auditor moderation? Evidence from sustainability reporting The effect of IFRS convergence on risk disclosure: an investigation into the Indian accounting system The effect of corporate governance, corporate social responsibility and information asymmetry on the value of Indonesian-listed firms Does CSR reduce financial distress? Moderating effect of firm characteristics, auditor characteristics, and covid-19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1