Tuberculin Skin Testing Compared with T-Cell Responses to Mycobacterium tuberculosis-Specific and Nonspecific Antigens for Detection of Latent Infection in Persons with Recent Tuberculosis Contact

S. Arend, Anrik C. F. Engelhard, Gertjan Groot, K. de Boer, P. Andersen, T. Ottenhoff, J. V. van Dissel
{"title":"Tuberculin Skin Testing Compared with T-Cell Responses to Mycobacterium tuberculosis-Specific and Nonspecific Antigens for Detection of Latent Infection in Persons with Recent Tuberculosis Contact","authors":"S. Arend, Anrik C. F. Engelhard, Gertjan Groot, K. de Boer, P. Andersen, T. Ottenhoff, J. V. van Dissel","doi":"10.1128/CDLI.8.6.1089-1096.2001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The tuberculin skin test (TST) is used for the identification of latent tuberculosis (TB) infection (LTBI) but lacks specificity inMycobacterium bovis BCG-vaccinated individuals, who constitute an increasing proportion of TB patients and their contacts from regions where TB is endemic. In previous studies, T-cell responses to ESAT-6 and CFP-10, M. tuberculosis-specific antigens that are absent from BCG, were sensitive and specific for detection of active TB. We studied 44 close contacts of a patient with smear-positive pulmonary TB and compared the standard screening procedure for LTBI by TST or chest radiographs with T-cell responses toM. tuberculosis-specific and nonspecific antigens. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were cocultured with ESAT-6, CFP-10, TB10.4 (each as recombinant antigen and as a mixture of overlapping synthetic peptides), M. tuberculosis sonicate, purified protein derivative (PPD), and short-term culture filtrate, using gamma interferon production as the response measure. LTBI screening was by TST in 36 participants and by chest radiographs in 8 persons. Nineteen contacts were categorized as TST negative, 12 were categorized as TST positive, and 5 had indeterminate TST results. Recombinant antigens and peptide mixtures gave similar results. Responses to TB10.4 were neither sensitive nor specific for LTBI. T-cell responses to ESAT-6 and CFP-10 were less sensitive for detection of LTBI than those to PPD (67 versus 100%) but considerably more specific (100 versus 72%). The specificity of the TST or in vitro responses to PPD will be even less when the proportion of BCG-vaccinated persons among TB contacts evaluated for LTBI increases.","PeriodicalId":10395,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology","volume":"42 1","pages":"1089 - 1096"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"95","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1128/CDLI.8.6.1089-1096.2001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 95

Abstract

ABSTRACT The tuberculin skin test (TST) is used for the identification of latent tuberculosis (TB) infection (LTBI) but lacks specificity inMycobacterium bovis BCG-vaccinated individuals, who constitute an increasing proportion of TB patients and their contacts from regions where TB is endemic. In previous studies, T-cell responses to ESAT-6 and CFP-10, M. tuberculosis-specific antigens that are absent from BCG, were sensitive and specific for detection of active TB. We studied 44 close contacts of a patient with smear-positive pulmonary TB and compared the standard screening procedure for LTBI by TST or chest radiographs with T-cell responses toM. tuberculosis-specific and nonspecific antigens. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were cocultured with ESAT-6, CFP-10, TB10.4 (each as recombinant antigen and as a mixture of overlapping synthetic peptides), M. tuberculosis sonicate, purified protein derivative (PPD), and short-term culture filtrate, using gamma interferon production as the response measure. LTBI screening was by TST in 36 participants and by chest radiographs in 8 persons. Nineteen contacts were categorized as TST negative, 12 were categorized as TST positive, and 5 had indeterminate TST results. Recombinant antigens and peptide mixtures gave similar results. Responses to TB10.4 were neither sensitive nor specific for LTBI. T-cell responses to ESAT-6 and CFP-10 were less sensitive for detection of LTBI than those to PPD (67 versus 100%) but considerably more specific (100 versus 72%). The specificity of the TST or in vitro responses to PPD will be even less when the proportion of BCG-vaccinated persons among TB contacts evaluated for LTBI increases.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
结核菌素皮肤试验与t细胞对结核分枝杆菌特异性和非特异性抗原反应检测近期接触结核病者潜伏感染的比较
结核菌素皮肤试验(TST)用于鉴定潜伏性结核(TB)感染(LTBI),但在牛分枝杆菌bcg疫苗接种个体中缺乏特异性,这些个体在结核病流行地区的结核病患者及其接触者中所占比例越来越大。在之前的研究中,t细胞对ESAT-6和CFP-10(结核分枝杆菌特异性抗原,卡介苗中不存在)的反应对活动性结核的检测是敏感和特异性的。我们研究了44名涂阳肺结核患者的密切接触者,并将TST或胸片筛查LTBI的标准程序与t细胞反应toM进行了比较。结核病特异性和非特异性抗原。外周血单核细胞与ESAT-6、CFP-10、TB10.4(分别作为重组抗原和重叠合成肽的混合物)、结核分枝杆菌、纯化蛋白衍生物(PPD)和短期培养滤液共培养,以γ干扰素的产生作为反应指标。36名参与者通过TST进行LTBI筛查,8名参与者通过胸片进行筛查。19例接触者TST阴性,12例TST阳性,5例TST结果不确定。重组抗原和多肽混合物给出了类似的结果。TB10.4对LTBI的反应既不敏感也不特异性。t细胞对ESAT-6和CFP-10的反应对LTBI检测的敏感性低于对PPD的反应(67%对100%),但特异性明显更高(100%对72%)。当接受LTBI评估的结核接触者中接种bcg的比例增加时,TST或体外对PPD反应的特异性将更低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Immunoglobulin G1 Antibody Response toHelicobacter pylori Heat Shock Protein 60 Is Closely Associated with Low-Grade Gastric Mucosa-Associated Lymphoid Tissue Lymphoma Antibodies against Streptococcus agalactiae Proteins cα and R4 in Sera from Pregnant Women from Norway and Zimbabwe Cystatin Capture Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay for Serodiagnosis of Human Clonorchiasis and Profile of Captured Antigenic Protein of Clonorchis sinensis Recognition of Multiple Classes of Hepatitis C Antibodies Increases Detection Sensitivity in Oral Fluid Circulating Inflammatory Mediators in Patients with Fever: Predicting Bloodstream Infection
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1