A clinical evaluation of an aspheric multifocal intraocular lens and its implications for the developing world.

S. Kaushik, Kamlesh
{"title":"A clinical evaluation of an aspheric multifocal intraocular lens and its implications for the developing world.","authors":"S. Kaushik, Kamlesh","doi":"10.3928/1542-8877-20020701-08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES\nTo evaluate the clinical performance of a new aspheric multifocal intraocular lens (IOL), and to compare the results with a corresponding monofocal IOL.\n\n\nPATIENTS AND METHODS\nTwo groups of 20 patients each were implanted with a multifocal and monofocal IOL and prospectively studied. Distance and near vision, contrast sensitivity, depth of focus, and quality of vision were assessed in both groups.\n\n\nRESULTS\nIn 85% of multifocal cases and 100% of monofocal cases, the corrected distance vision was 6/9 or better. With distance correction, 80% of multifocal cases had near vision of N9 or better against 10% of monofocal cases. The mean addition required for near vision N6 was +0.8 diopters (D) and +2.6 D in the multifocal and monofocal groups, respectively. Multifocal cases showed significantly decreased contrast sensitivity and increased depth of focus.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nMultifocal IOLs are a good option for those with nonexacting visual requirements. The loss in contrast sensitivity seems to be an acceptable trade-off for satisfactory unaided near vision.","PeriodicalId":19509,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmic surgery and lasers","volume":"30 1","pages":"298-303"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmic surgery and lasers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3928/1542-8877-20020701-08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES To evaluate the clinical performance of a new aspheric multifocal intraocular lens (IOL), and to compare the results with a corresponding monofocal IOL. PATIENTS AND METHODS Two groups of 20 patients each were implanted with a multifocal and monofocal IOL and prospectively studied. Distance and near vision, contrast sensitivity, depth of focus, and quality of vision were assessed in both groups. RESULTS In 85% of multifocal cases and 100% of monofocal cases, the corrected distance vision was 6/9 or better. With distance correction, 80% of multifocal cases had near vision of N9 or better against 10% of monofocal cases. The mean addition required for near vision N6 was +0.8 diopters (D) and +2.6 D in the multifocal and monofocal groups, respectively. Multifocal cases showed significantly decreased contrast sensitivity and increased depth of focus. CONCLUSIONS Multifocal IOLs are a good option for those with nonexacting visual requirements. The loss in contrast sensitivity seems to be an acceptable trade-off for satisfactory unaided near vision.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非球面多焦人工晶状体的临床评价及其对发展中国家的意义。
背景与目的评价新型非球面多焦点人工晶状体(IOL)的临床效果,并与相应的单焦点人工晶状体进行比较。患者与方法采用多焦点和单焦点人工晶体植入术,每组各20例,进行前瞻性研究。对两组患者的远近视力、对比敏感度、聚焦深度和视力质量进行评估。结果85%的多焦病例和100%的单焦病例矫正视力达到6/9及以上。经过距离矫正后,80%的多焦点病例的近视力达到N9级或更好,而10%的单焦点病例的近视力达到N9级或更好。在多焦点组和单焦点组中,近视力N6所需的平均增加值分别为+0.8屈光度(D)和+2.6 D。多焦病例的对比敏感度明显降低,焦深明显增加。结论多焦点人工晶状体是视力要求不严格的患者较好的选择。对比敏感度的下降似乎是获得满意的无辅助近视力的一个可接受的代价。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Introduction: Improving Outcomes for Patients With Diabetic Macular Edema Acute Visual Loss Secondary to Sneezing Concurrent Keratitis and Endophthalmitis Associated With Topical Medications Contaminated by Serratia Marcescens Donor Lenticule Centration for Trephination in DSAEK Welcome to OSLI Retina
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1