Grading And Assessments: Correlations Of Variables Affecting Teaching And Course Assessments

J. L. Ellis, T. J. Francl
{"title":"Grading And Assessments: Correlations Of Variables Affecting Teaching And Course Assessments","authors":"J. L. Ellis, T. J. Francl","doi":"10.19030/CIER.V8I2.9139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Faculty assessments are a hot topic in academia. Mostly considered an unproven statistic holding the professor hostage for a good grade, the benefits are still in discussion. At course end, we expect students to have the ability to analyze what we think they should have learned. In reality, most students do not have the maturity to realize correlation for what you put into your education is what you get out. Consensus is that it does not happen the way we plan. Adding to the assessment issue is the clear fact that today most universities are adjunct professor-driven. Given these facts, the authors have statistically studied teaching assessments and associated grade point averages (GPA) representing academic rigor at a major non-profit university over the past three years. The authors’ hypothesis is that there is no correlation between the two statistics. This paper reviews the literature, provides the study methodology, and presents the findings.","PeriodicalId":91062,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary issues in education research (Littleton, Colo.)","volume":"5 1","pages":"71-78"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary issues in education research (Littleton, Colo.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19030/CIER.V8I2.9139","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Faculty assessments are a hot topic in academia. Mostly considered an unproven statistic holding the professor hostage for a good grade, the benefits are still in discussion. At course end, we expect students to have the ability to analyze what we think they should have learned. In reality, most students do not have the maturity to realize correlation for what you put into your education is what you get out. Consensus is that it does not happen the way we plan. Adding to the assessment issue is the clear fact that today most universities are adjunct professor-driven. Given these facts, the authors have statistically studied teaching assessments and associated grade point averages (GPA) representing academic rigor at a major non-profit university over the past three years. The authors’ hypothesis is that there is no correlation between the two statistics. This paper reviews the literature, provides the study methodology, and presents the findings.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评分和评估:影响教学和课程评估的变量的相关性
教师评估是学术界的一个热门话题。大多数人认为这是一个未经证实的统计数据,将教授作为一个好成绩的人质,其好处仍在讨论中。在课程结束时,我们希望学生有能力分析我们认为他们应该学的东西。在现实中,大多数学生还没有成熟到意识到你在教育中所投入的就是你所得到的。共识是,事情不会按照我们计划的方式发生。评估问题的另一个明显事实是,如今大多数大学都是由兼职教授驱动的。鉴于这些事实,作者在过去三年中统计研究了一所主要非营利性大学的教学评估和相关的平均绩点(GPA),这些绩点代表了学术严谨性。作者的假设是,这两个统计数据之间没有相关性。本文回顾了文献,提供了研究方法,并提出了研究结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Fluency Strategies For Beginning Readers Dramatic Play In Relation To Self- Regulation In Preschool Age Exploring The Relationship Between Emotional Intelligence And Academic Stress Among Students At A Small, Private College A Marketing Course And The Liberal Arts: Students’ Perspective Of Interdisciplinary Relevance Improving Engagement In A Lecture Course By Increasing Relevance To Student Needs And Interests
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1