Analysis of survival in lung transplantation: simple diagnostic tests in a new "SELeCT" Score used as prognostic tool. Results from a single center cohort study
F. Patrucco, C. Albera, E. Clivati, M. Boffini, M. Rinaldi, C. Costa, R. Cavallo, P. Solidoro
{"title":"Analysis of survival in lung transplantation: simple diagnostic tests in a new \"SELeCT\" Score used as prognostic tool. Results from a single center cohort study","authors":"F. Patrucco, C. Albera, E. Clivati, M. Boffini, M. Rinaldi, C. Costa, R. Cavallo, P. Solidoro","doi":"10.23736/s2784-8477.21.01985-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BacKGroUNd: there are few validated scores evaluating outcomes of lung transplanted patients based on donor or recipient characteristic before or at the time of transplantation. MetHods: in our study we evaluated a new, and easy to use, 5-item score on survival of patients who underwent lung transplantation. It was called SELeCT Score and was based on clinical, laboratoristic and radiological findings recorded at each observation. resULts: We found higher scores in case of unscheduled observations and an inverse correlation with overall survival rate, even excluding patients who died within 60 days. We identified a threshold of 2 points as significant to predict patients’ survival. Fungal and bacterial infections show scores higher than acute rejections and cMV and other viral infections. coNcLUsioNs: seLect score could represent a useful prognostic tool in guiding clinical choices, demonstrating that more compromised patients (routinely evaluated with clinic, laboratory test and radiological images) had a worse outcome, and that it could be important at least as much as","PeriodicalId":29817,"journal":{"name":"Minerva Respiratory Medicine","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva Respiratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/s2784-8477.21.01985-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
BacKGroUNd: there are few validated scores evaluating outcomes of lung transplanted patients based on donor or recipient characteristic before or at the time of transplantation. MetHods: in our study we evaluated a new, and easy to use, 5-item score on survival of patients who underwent lung transplantation. It was called SELeCT Score and was based on clinical, laboratoristic and radiological findings recorded at each observation. resULts: We found higher scores in case of unscheduled observations and an inverse correlation with overall survival rate, even excluding patients who died within 60 days. We identified a threshold of 2 points as significant to predict patients’ survival. Fungal and bacterial infections show scores higher than acute rejections and cMV and other viral infections. coNcLUsioNs: seLect score could represent a useful prognostic tool in guiding clinical choices, demonstrating that more compromised patients (routinely evaluated with clinic, laboratory test and radiological images) had a worse outcome, and that it could be important at least as much as