Surgical treatment outcome of obstructive sleep apnea patient with nasal cavity and oropharyngeal airway abnormality

W. Tangsawad
{"title":"Surgical treatment outcome of obstructive sleep apnea patient with nasal cavity and oropharyngeal airway abnormality","authors":"W. Tangsawad","doi":"10.15406/jlprr.2020.07.00227","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the result of the multilevel single-stage procedure for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) with a narrow nasal cavity and oropharyngeal, velopharyngeal airspace. A retrospective study was performed in OSA patients who underwent surgery in Khon Kaen hospital, Thailand. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted and medical records were reviewed between 2015 May and 2019 November in patients with loud snoring and having symptoms and signs of OSA, 43 patients included for evaluation history taking and physical examination by fiberoptic laryngoscope and performed multilevel single-stage procedure and evaluated clinical postoperative. Results: All patients were evaluated preoperatively by a history taking and physical examination for clinical assessment including fiberoptic laryngoscope examination. There were 3 surgical procedure, Procedure 1: 12 patients underwent Tonsillectomy with uvulopalatopharyngoplasty (27.9%), Procedure 2: 22 patients underwent Tonsillectomy with uvulopalatopharyngoplasty and inferior turbinoplasty (51.2%), Procedure 3: 9 patients underwent Tonsillectomy with uvulopalatopharyngoplasty and inferior turbinoplasty, and septoplasty (20.9%). After a 1-week post-operation 41 patients (95.3%), all (100.0%) no symptoms of OSA, and 60.9% improved their loud snoring more than 80.0%. After 3-week post-operation, 32 patients (74.4%) followed up and all (100.0%) no symptoms of OSA, 27 patients (84.4%) improved their loud snoring by more than 80.0%. Conclusion: Clinical assessment in patient with OSA is important before treatment. The Multilevel single-stage procedure is alternative choice for first treatment of OSA patients who reject continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) or failure using CPAP. The results outcome is good for both obesity and non-obesity patients and improve clinical in OSA.","PeriodicalId":91750,"journal":{"name":"Journal of lung, pulmonary & respiratory research","volume":"46 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of lung, pulmonary & respiratory research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15406/jlprr.2020.07.00227","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the result of the multilevel single-stage procedure for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) with a narrow nasal cavity and oropharyngeal, velopharyngeal airspace. A retrospective study was performed in OSA patients who underwent surgery in Khon Kaen hospital, Thailand. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted and medical records were reviewed between 2015 May and 2019 November in patients with loud snoring and having symptoms and signs of OSA, 43 patients included for evaluation history taking and physical examination by fiberoptic laryngoscope and performed multilevel single-stage procedure and evaluated clinical postoperative. Results: All patients were evaluated preoperatively by a history taking and physical examination for clinical assessment including fiberoptic laryngoscope examination. There were 3 surgical procedure, Procedure 1: 12 patients underwent Tonsillectomy with uvulopalatopharyngoplasty (27.9%), Procedure 2: 22 patients underwent Tonsillectomy with uvulopalatopharyngoplasty and inferior turbinoplasty (51.2%), Procedure 3: 9 patients underwent Tonsillectomy with uvulopalatopharyngoplasty and inferior turbinoplasty, and septoplasty (20.9%). After a 1-week post-operation 41 patients (95.3%), all (100.0%) no symptoms of OSA, and 60.9% improved their loud snoring more than 80.0%. After 3-week post-operation, 32 patients (74.4%) followed up and all (100.0%) no symptoms of OSA, 27 patients (84.4%) improved their loud snoring by more than 80.0%. Conclusion: Clinical assessment in patient with OSA is important before treatment. The Multilevel single-stage procedure is alternative choice for first treatment of OSA patients who reject continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) or failure using CPAP. The results outcome is good for both obesity and non-obesity patients and improve clinical in OSA.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
伴有鼻腔及口咽气道异常的阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停患者的手术治疗效果
背景:本研究的目的是评估阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)的多阶段单阶段手术治疗狭窄鼻腔和口咽、腭咽空域的结果。回顾性研究在泰国Khon Kaen医院接受手术的OSA患者。方法:回顾性分析2015年5月至2019年11月43例伴有OSA症状和体征的大声打鼾患者的病历,对其进行纤维喉镜评估病史和体格检查,并进行多阶段单阶段手术和临床术后评估。结果:术前对所有患者进行病史和体格检查,包括纤维喉镜检查。手术方式有3种,方式1:扁桃体切除合并悬雍垂腭咽成形术12例(27.9%),方式2:扁桃体切除合并悬雍垂腭咽成形术和下鼻甲成形术22例(51.2%),方式3:扁桃体切除合并悬雍垂腭咽成形术和下鼻甲成形术9例(20.9%)。术后1周41例(95.3%)患者均(100.0%)无OSA症状,其中60.9%患者鼾声改善超过80.0%。术后3周随访32例(74.4%)患者无OSA症状(100.0%),27例(84.4%)患者鼾声改善80.0%以上。结论:阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停患者的临床评估在治疗前很重要。对于拒绝持续气道正压通气(CPAP)或使用CPAP失败的OSA患者,多级单阶段手术是首次治疗的替代选择。结果对肥胖和非肥胖患者均有良好的预后,改善了OSA的临床疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Case of hydropneumothorax Medication resistant tuberculosis: multi drugresistant and extensively drug resistant First aid for acute lung inflammation Continuation of therapeutic anticoagulation before and during hospitalization is associated with reduced mortality in COVID-19 ICU patients Subtyping meconium protease activities which degrade lung protective angiotensin converting enzyme-2 in human lung cells
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1