Sharenting and parents’ digital literacy: an agenda for future research

IF 1.2 Q3 COMMUNICATION Communication Research and Practice Pub Date : 2020-12-01 DOI:10.1080/22041451.2020.1847819
Renee Barnes, A. Potter
{"title":"Sharenting and parents’ digital literacy: an agenda for future research","authors":"Renee Barnes, A. Potter","doi":"10.1080/22041451.2020.1847819","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The responsibility for protecting children in the digital environment is perceived to be that of parents who are provided with multiple guidelines for monitoring children’s screen time and online use. The societal understanding that parents are responsible for supervising– and controlling– their children’s online behaviour is clear. As a result, studies have tended to focus on parents’ digital literacy in relation to these policing and managing responsibilities. A growing body of research, however, has examined parents’ behaviour creating their own digital narratives using personal information and photographs of their children through ‘sharenting’. This paper contrasts parents’ digital literacy as publishers of personal information and narratives with their designated role in policing and managing their children’s media use. Parental power in this context inevitably extends to the control of their children’s privacy, however our study indicates breaches of children’s privacy by ‘sharenting’ practices is frequently not recognised or fully understood by parents.","PeriodicalId":10644,"journal":{"name":"Communication Research and Practice","volume":"137 1","pages":"6 - 20"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"27","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communication Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/22041451.2020.1847819","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 27

Abstract

ABSTRACT The responsibility for protecting children in the digital environment is perceived to be that of parents who are provided with multiple guidelines for monitoring children’s screen time and online use. The societal understanding that parents are responsible for supervising– and controlling– their children’s online behaviour is clear. As a result, studies have tended to focus on parents’ digital literacy in relation to these policing and managing responsibilities. A growing body of research, however, has examined parents’ behaviour creating their own digital narratives using personal information and photographs of their children through ‘sharenting’. This paper contrasts parents’ digital literacy as publishers of personal information and narratives with their designated role in policing and managing their children’s media use. Parental power in this context inevitably extends to the control of their children’s privacy, however our study indicates breaches of children’s privacy by ‘sharenting’ practices is frequently not recognised or fully understood by parents.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
分享和父母的数字素养:未来研究的议程
在数字环境中保护儿童的责任被认为是父母的责任,父母需要提供多种指导方针来监控儿童的屏幕时间和在线使用情况。社会对父母有责任监督和控制孩子上网行为的理解是显而易见的。因此,研究倾向于关注父母的数字素养与这些监管和管理责任的关系。然而,越来越多的研究调查了父母通过“分享”的方式,利用孩子的个人信息和照片创造自己的数字故事的行为。本文将父母作为个人信息和叙述的发布者的数字素养与他们在监督和管理孩子的媒体使用方面的指定角色进行了对比。在这种情况下,父母的权力不可避免地延伸到对孩子隐私的控制,然而,我们的研究表明,父母通常不会意识到或完全理解“分享”行为对孩子隐私的侵犯。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
8.30%
发文量
21
期刊最新文献
Four provocations for rich digital ethnographic research situated in social media networks Devising an ethical ‘death knock’ model: the role of preparations, precursors, and professional identity in mitigating moral injury for journalists The demographics of digital disconnection: prevalence, motives and barriers to disconnecting from the Internet in Aotearoa New Zealand Stakeholder engagement and chaotic narrative spaces: Singapore’s COVID-19 outbreak in foreign-worker dormitories “We will not be lectured”: understanding political fandom on TikTok
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1