Evaluation of Health Benefit from the Environmental Health Action Program Based on the Environmental Burden of Disease

Y. Choi, G. Byun, Jong-Tae Lee
{"title":"Evaluation of Health Benefit from the Environmental Health Action Program Based on the Environmental Burden of Disease","authors":"Y. Choi, G. Byun, Jong-Tae Lee","doi":"10.5668/jehs.2022.48.2.123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The Environmental Health Action Program was a national project carried out from 2012~2021. It was aimed at developing public technologies to protect people's health from various environmental hazards. Objectives: One of the final goals of the project was “creating health benefits worth more than 179.2 billion won by reducing the environmental burden of disease.” This study aims to evaluate whether the program sufficiently achieved the planned benefits. Methods: In order to secure consistency in evaluation, we applied the same equation used in the goal-setting process. It is comprised of six parameters to estimate the benefit: 1. The amount of medical expenses for environmental diseases; 2. The attributable proportion of environmental risk factors’ 3. The rate of reduction in medical expenses for environmental diseases; 4. R&D project contribution; 5. The proportion of successful policy reflection; and 6. The contributions of the project. The corresponding variables were estimated at the end of the project, and the health benefits of the project were recalculated using the newly estimated variables. Results: It was estimated that a total of 195 billion won in health benefits occurred or will occur from 2015 to 2026. The main contributors for achieving the target were an increase in medical expenses for environmental diseases, a high score in the R&D project contribution, and the proportion of successful policy reflection. Conclusions: Technically, the equation used in the project is about medical expenses for environmental diseases rather than about the environmental burden of disease. There are several benefits of using the environmental burden of disease in the evaluation of public health policies. In further studies, developing a policy evaluation framework using indicators such as population attributable fraction would be needed.","PeriodicalId":17891,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Environmental Health Sciences","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Environmental Health Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5668/jehs.2022.48.2.123","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Environmental Health Action Program was a national project carried out from 2012~2021. It was aimed at developing public technologies to protect people's health from various environmental hazards. Objectives: One of the final goals of the project was “creating health benefits worth more than 179.2 billion won by reducing the environmental burden of disease.” This study aims to evaluate whether the program sufficiently achieved the planned benefits. Methods: In order to secure consistency in evaluation, we applied the same equation used in the goal-setting process. It is comprised of six parameters to estimate the benefit: 1. The amount of medical expenses for environmental diseases; 2. The attributable proportion of environmental risk factors’ 3. The rate of reduction in medical expenses for environmental diseases; 4. R&D project contribution; 5. The proportion of successful policy reflection; and 6. The contributions of the project. The corresponding variables were estimated at the end of the project, and the health benefits of the project were recalculated using the newly estimated variables. Results: It was estimated that a total of 195 billion won in health benefits occurred or will occur from 2015 to 2026. The main contributors for achieving the target were an increase in medical expenses for environmental diseases, a high score in the R&D project contribution, and the proportion of successful policy reflection. Conclusions: Technically, the equation used in the project is about medical expenses for environmental diseases rather than about the environmental burden of disease. There are several benefits of using the environmental burden of disease in the evaluation of public health policies. In further studies, developing a policy evaluation framework using indicators such as population attributable fraction would be needed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于疾病环境负担的环境卫生行动方案健康效益评价
背景:环境健康行动计划是2012~2021年实施的国家项目。它的目的是开发公共技术,以保护人们的健康免受各种环境危害。目标:该项目的最终目标之一是"通过减少疾病造成的环境负担,创造价值超过1792亿韩元的健康效益"。本研究旨在评估该方案是否充分实现了计划效益。方法:为了保证评价的一致性,我们采用了与目标设定过程相同的方程。它包括六个参数来估计效益:1。环境类疾病的医疗费用金额;2. 环境风险因素的归因比例为3。环境疾病的医疗费用减少率;4. 研发项目贡献;5. 政策反思成功的比例;和6。项目的贡献。在项目结束时估计相应的变量,并使用新估计的变量重新计算项目的健康效益。结果:据估计,从2015年到2026年,共发生或将发生1950亿韩元的健康福利。实现目标的主要因素是环境疾病医疗费用增加、研发项目贡献得分高、政策反思成功比例高。结论:从技术上讲,项目中使用的方程是关于环境疾病的医疗费用,而不是关于疾病的环境负担。在评价公共卫生政策时使用疾病的环境负担有若干好处。在进一步的研究中,需要使用诸如人口归因率等指标制定政策评价框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Assessment of Heavy Metal Exposure Levels (Pb, Hg, Cd) among South Koreans and Contribution Rates by Exposure Route - Korean National Environmental Health Survey (KoNEHS) Cycle 4 (2018~2020) - A Regional Safety Campaign to Prevent Chemical Accidents in the Workplace Chronic Exposure to Arsenic and the Effects on Human Health Radiological and Geochemical Assessment of Different Rock Types from Ogun State in Southwestern Nigeria Preliminary Research to Support Air Quality Management Policies for Basic Local Governments in Gyeonggi-do
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1