Declining idealism: A study of higher education teacher’s beliefs about grading decision making

B. Pratolo, E. Purwanti
{"title":"Declining idealism: A study of higher education teacher’s beliefs about grading decision making","authors":"B. Pratolo, E. Purwanti","doi":"10.31763/IJELE.V3I2.374","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed to unpack higher education teachers’ beliefs about grading decision making. A qualitative approach was employed in this study to answer the research question. In-depth semi-structured interview as the main data collecting technique was utilized to gather any information from higher education teachers. Four higher education teachers with different educational backgrounds and teaching experiences volunteered to be the participants. Three main themes were generated from the data i.e., the factors considered in grading decision making, the most challenging parts in grading, and handing students’ complaints about grades. This study indicates that developing assessment rubrics, discussing them with students, and documenting them in the learning contract may be effective strategies for teachers to remind the students of the course requirements to reach minimum criteria of mastery learning.","PeriodicalId":34273,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Development Education and Global Learning","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Development Education and Global Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31763/IJELE.V3I2.374","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to unpack higher education teachers’ beliefs about grading decision making. A qualitative approach was employed in this study to answer the research question. In-depth semi-structured interview as the main data collecting technique was utilized to gather any information from higher education teachers. Four higher education teachers with different educational backgrounds and teaching experiences volunteered to be the participants. Three main themes were generated from the data i.e., the factors considered in grading decision making, the most challenging parts in grading, and handing students’ complaints about grades. This study indicates that developing assessment rubrics, discussing them with students, and documenting them in the learning contract may be effective strategies for teachers to remind the students of the course requirements to reach minimum criteria of mastery learning.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
理想主义的衰落:高等教育教师评分决策信念的研究
本研究旨在了解高等教育教师对评分决策的看法。本研究采用定性方法来回答研究问题。采用深度半结构化访谈作为主要的数据收集技术来收集高等教育教师的任何信息。四位具有不同教育背景和教学经验的高等教育教师自愿成为参与者。从数据中产生了三个主要主题,即评分决策中考虑的因素,评分中最具挑战性的部分,以及处理学生对成绩的投诉。本研究表明,制定评估标准,与学生讨论,并将其记录在学习合同中,可能是教师提醒学生课程要求以达到掌握学习的最低标准的有效策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3
审稿时长
59 weeks
期刊最新文献
Editorial: global citizenship as a pedagogy of hope Beyond a pedagogy of reason: exploring a pedagogical approach for a non-Western context Integrating planetary citizenship as a cross-curricular theme and a whole-school approach: using a value-creating approach to learning Situating Daisaku Ikeda’s essential elements of global citizenship within contemporary scholarship: a qualitative meta-synthesis Futures and hope of global citizenship education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1