Retrospective Analysis of Arterial Carbon Dioxide Level and Arterial pH Level at the Time of Initiation of Respiratory ECMO and Outcome

Pranay Oza, Rajendra Umbarkar, V. Goyal, P. Shukla
{"title":"Retrospective Analysis of Arterial Carbon Dioxide Level and Arterial pH Level at the Time of Initiation of Respiratory ECMO and Outcome","authors":"Pranay Oza, Rajendra Umbarkar, V. Goyal, P. Shukla","doi":"10.1055/s-0042-1757395","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Introduction Respiratory extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is well established and its popularity has increased during coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) time. The efficacy of ECMO has been proved in refractory respiratory failure with varied etiology. More than 85,000 respiratory ECMO cases (neonatal, pediatric, adult) registered as per Extracorporeal Life support Organization (ELSO) statistics April 2022 report, with survived to discharge or transfer ranging from 58 to 73%. Early initiation of ECMO is usually associated with shorter ECMO run and better outcome. Many patient factors have been associated with mortality while on ECMO. Pre-ECMO patient pH and arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide (paCO2) have been associated with poor outcome. We designed a retrospective study from a single tertiary care center and analyzed our data of all respiratory ECMO (neonatal, pediatric, and adult) to understand the effect of pre ECMO, paCO2, and arterial pH to ECMO outcome.\n Methods It is a retrospective analysis of data collected of patients with acute respiratory failure managed on ECMO from January 2010 to December 2021. Pre-ECMO (1–6 hours before initiation), paCO2, and arterial pH level were noted and analyzed with primary and secondary outcome. Primary outcome goal was survivor and discharged home versus nonsurvivor, while secondary goal was the number of ECMO days and incidence of neurological complications. The statistical analysis was done for primary outcome and incidences of neurological complications and p-value obtained by using chi-squared method. Meta-analysis was done by classifying the respiratory ECMO cases in three major category—COVID-19, H1N1 non-COVID-19, and H1N1 respiratory failure.\n Results The total 256 patients of respiratory failure were treated with ECMO during specified period by Riddhi Vinayak Multispecialty Hospital ECMO team. Data analysis of 251 patients (5 patients were transferred for lung transplant, hence been not included in study) done. Patients were divided on the basis of pH level less than 7.2 and more than 7.2 and analyzed for primary and secondary outcome. Similarly, patients were divided on the basis of paCO2 level of less than 45 and more than 45.Patient with pre-ECMO pH level more than 7.2 has statistically better survived extracorporeal life support (ECLS) (p-value: 0.008) and survival to discharge home (p-value: 0.038) chances. Pre-ECMO paCO2 level of less than 45 also showed better survival chance of survived ECLS (46.67 vs. 36.02) and survived to discharge home (42.22 vs. 31.06) but not statistically significant (p-value: 0.15 and 0.18, respectively). There was no significant difference in average number of ECMO days in patient survived to discharge home with paCO2 less than 45 and more than 45 (15.7 vs. 11.1 days), and also in pH more than 7.2 and pH less than 7.2 (15.8 vs. 11.6). The incidence of neurological complications was also found lower in patient with pH more than 7.2 (7.5 vs. 17.3%, p-value: 0.034) and in paCO2 level of less than 45 (4.4 vs. 12.65, p-value: 0.15).\n Conclusion Pre-ECMO arterial pH of more than 7.2 (statistically significant) and paCO2 of less than 45 (statistically not significant) have definitely better survival chances and have lesser incidences of neurological complications. There was no significance difference in the number of ECMO days in either group. Authors recommends early initiation of ECMO for mortality and morbidity benefits.","PeriodicalId":34567,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiac Critical Care TSS","volume":"71 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiac Critical Care TSS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1757395","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction Respiratory extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is well established and its popularity has increased during coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) time. The efficacy of ECMO has been proved in refractory respiratory failure with varied etiology. More than 85,000 respiratory ECMO cases (neonatal, pediatric, adult) registered as per Extracorporeal Life support Organization (ELSO) statistics April 2022 report, with survived to discharge or transfer ranging from 58 to 73%. Early initiation of ECMO is usually associated with shorter ECMO run and better outcome. Many patient factors have been associated with mortality while on ECMO. Pre-ECMO patient pH and arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide (paCO2) have been associated with poor outcome. We designed a retrospective study from a single tertiary care center and analyzed our data of all respiratory ECMO (neonatal, pediatric, and adult) to understand the effect of pre ECMO, paCO2, and arterial pH to ECMO outcome. Methods It is a retrospective analysis of data collected of patients with acute respiratory failure managed on ECMO from January 2010 to December 2021. Pre-ECMO (1–6 hours before initiation), paCO2, and arterial pH level were noted and analyzed with primary and secondary outcome. Primary outcome goal was survivor and discharged home versus nonsurvivor, while secondary goal was the number of ECMO days and incidence of neurological complications. The statistical analysis was done for primary outcome and incidences of neurological complications and p-value obtained by using chi-squared method. Meta-analysis was done by classifying the respiratory ECMO cases in three major category—COVID-19, H1N1 non-COVID-19, and H1N1 respiratory failure. Results The total 256 patients of respiratory failure were treated with ECMO during specified period by Riddhi Vinayak Multispecialty Hospital ECMO team. Data analysis of 251 patients (5 patients were transferred for lung transplant, hence been not included in study) done. Patients were divided on the basis of pH level less than 7.2 and more than 7.2 and analyzed for primary and secondary outcome. Similarly, patients were divided on the basis of paCO2 level of less than 45 and more than 45.Patient with pre-ECMO pH level more than 7.2 has statistically better survived extracorporeal life support (ECLS) (p-value: 0.008) and survival to discharge home (p-value: 0.038) chances. Pre-ECMO paCO2 level of less than 45 also showed better survival chance of survived ECLS (46.67 vs. 36.02) and survived to discharge home (42.22 vs. 31.06) but not statistically significant (p-value: 0.15 and 0.18, respectively). There was no significant difference in average number of ECMO days in patient survived to discharge home with paCO2 less than 45 and more than 45 (15.7 vs. 11.1 days), and also in pH more than 7.2 and pH less than 7.2 (15.8 vs. 11.6). The incidence of neurological complications was also found lower in patient with pH more than 7.2 (7.5 vs. 17.3%, p-value: 0.034) and in paCO2 level of less than 45 (4.4 vs. 12.65, p-value: 0.15). Conclusion Pre-ECMO arterial pH of more than 7.2 (statistically significant) and paCO2 of less than 45 (statistically not significant) have definitely better survival chances and have lesser incidences of neurological complications. There was no significance difference in the number of ECMO days in either group. Authors recommends early initiation of ECMO for mortality and morbidity benefits.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
呼吸性ECMO开始时动脉二氧化碳水平和动脉pH水平及结果的回顾性分析
在2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)期间,呼吸体外膜氧合(ECMO)已经建立并普及。ECMO治疗各种病因的难治性呼吸衰竭的疗效已得到证实。根据体外生命支持组织(ELSO) 2022年4月的统计报告,超过85,000例呼吸ECMO病例(新生儿,儿童,成人)登记,存活至出院或转移的比例为58%至73%。早期开始ECMO通常与较短的ECMO运行时间和较好的结果相关。许多患者因素与体外氧合时的死亡率有关。ecmo前患者的pH值和动脉二氧化碳分压(paCO2)与不良预后相关。我们设计了一项来自单一三级护理中心的回顾性研究,并分析了所有呼吸系统ECMO(新生儿、儿童和成人)的数据,以了解ECMO前、paCO2和动脉pH对ECMO结果的影响。方法回顾性分析2010年1月至2021年12月ECMO治疗急性呼吸衰竭患者的资料。记录ecmo前(开始前1-6小时)、paCO2和动脉pH水平,并分析其主要和次要结局。主要结局目标是幸存者和出院回家与非幸存者的比较,而次要目标是ECMO天数和神经系统并发症的发生率。对主要结局和神经系统并发症发生率进行统计学分析,p值采用卡方法。将呼吸道ECMO病例分为covid -19、H1N1非covid -19和H1N1呼吸衰竭3大类进行meta分析。结果共有256例呼吸衰竭患者在规定的时间内接受了Riddhi Vinayak多专科医院ECMO组的ECMO治疗。对251例患者进行了数据分析(其中5例患者转行肺移植,因此未纳入研究)。根据pH值小于7.2和大于7.2进行分组,分析主要和次要结局。同样,根据paCO2水平小于45和大于45分患者。ecmo前pH值大于7.2的患者体外生命支持(ECLS)存活(p值:0.008)和出院回家存活(p值:0.038)的机会有统计学意义。ecmo前paCO2水平低于45的患者ECLS存活几率(46.67比36.02)和出院几率(42.22比31.06)也更高,但p值分别为0.15和0.18,差异无统计学意义。paCO2小于45和大于45的患者存活至出院的ECMO平均天数(15.7天vs 11.1天),以及pH大于7.2和小于7.2的患者(15.8天vs 11.6天)无显著差异。pH > 7.2 (7.5 vs. 17.3%, p值:0.034)和paCO2 < 45 (4.4 vs. 12.65, p值:0.15)患者神经系统并发症发生率较低。结论ecmo前动脉pH > 7.2(有统计学意义)、paCO2 < 45(无统计学意义)患者的生存几率明显提高,神经系统并发症发生率明显降低。两组患者ECMO天数差异无统计学意义。作者建议尽早开始ECMO以降低死亡率和发病率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊最新文献
Prognostic Cardiac Biomarkers and Tetralogy of Fallot Score: Do they Predict Outcomes in Intracardiac Tetralogy of Fallot Repair? The Anesthesiologist as Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Intensivist: Heralding a New Era? Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Nursing Care A Bibliometric Study on Junctional Ectopic Tachycardia: Time and Trends have much to Tell! Evaluation of Right Ventricular Function in Patients Undergoing Mitral Valve Replacement with Pulmonary Artery Systolic Pressure of more than 50 mmHg: A Prospective Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1