INDEPENDENCE PROOFS IN NON-CLASSICAL SET THEORIES

IF 0.9 3区 数学 Q1 LOGIC Review of Symbolic Logic Pub Date : 2021-03-22 DOI:10.1017/S1755020321000095
Sourav Tarafder, G. Venturi
{"title":"INDEPENDENCE PROOFS IN NON-CLASSICAL SET THEORIES","authors":"Sourav Tarafder, G. Venturi","doi":"10.1017/S1755020321000095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In this paper we extend to non-classical set theories the standard strategy of proving independence using Boolean-valued models. This extension is provided by means of a new technique that, combining algebras (by taking their product), is able to provide product-algebra-valued models of set theories. In this paper we also provide applications of this new technique by showing that: (1) we can import the classical independence results to non-classical set theory (as an example we prove the independence of \n \n \n \n$\\mathsf {CH}$\n\n \n ); and (2) we can provide new independence results. We end by discussing the role of non-classical algebra-valued models for the debate between universists and multiversists and by arguing that non-classical models should be included as legitimate members of the multiverse.","PeriodicalId":49628,"journal":{"name":"Review of Symbolic Logic","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Symbolic Logic","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755020321000095","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LOGIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

In this paper we extend to non-classical set theories the standard strategy of proving independence using Boolean-valued models. This extension is provided by means of a new technique that, combining algebras (by taking their product), is able to provide product-algebra-valued models of set theories. In this paper we also provide applications of this new technique by showing that: (1) we can import the classical independence results to non-classical set theory (as an example we prove the independence of $\mathsf {CH}$ ); and (2) we can provide new independence results. We end by discussing the role of non-classical algebra-valued models for the debate between universists and multiversists and by arguing that non-classical models should be included as legitimate members of the multiverse.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非经典集合论中的独立性证明
本文将布尔值模型证明独立性的标准策略推广到非经典集合理论中。这种扩展是通过一种新技术提供的,该技术结合代数(通过取它们的乘积),能够提供集合理论的积代数值模型。在本文中,我们还提供了这种新技术的应用,证明了:(1)我们可以将经典的独立性结果引入到非经典集合论中(作为一个例子,我们证明了$\mathsf {CH}$的独立性);(2)我们可以提供新的独立性结果。最后,我们讨论了非经典代数值模型在大学论者和多元论者之间争论中的作用,并论证了非经典模型应该被包括为多元宇宙的合法成员。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Review of Symbolic Logic
Review of Symbolic Logic 数学-数学
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Review of Symbolic Logic is designed to cultivate research on the borders of logic, philosophy, and the sciences, and to support substantive interactions between these disciplines. The journal welcomes submissions in any of the following areas, broadly construed: - The general study of logical systems and their semantics,including non-classical logics and algebraic logic; - Philosophical logic and formal epistemology, including interactions with decision theory and game theory; - The history, philosophy, and methodology of logic and mathematics, including the history of philosophy of logic and mathematics; - Applications of logic to the sciences, such as computer science, cognitive science, and linguistics; and logical results addressing foundational issues in the sciences.
期刊最新文献
Ontological Purity for Formal Proofs Non-Factive Kolmogorov Conditionalization An algebraic proof of completeness for monadic fuzzy predicate logic mMTL Decidable fragments of the Quantified argument calculus ALGEBRAIC SEMANTICS FOR RELATIVE TRUTH, AWARENESS, AND POSSIBILITY
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1