A Comparison of Face-to-Face Versus Tablet-Based Delivery of the Patient Health Questionnaire-2 Screening for Depression in Primary Care

M. Weimer, M. A. Maurer, A. Baus
{"title":"A Comparison of Face-to-Face Versus Tablet-Based Delivery of the Patient Health Questionnaire-2 Screening for Depression in Primary Care","authors":"M. Weimer, M. A. Maurer, A. Baus","doi":"10.21885/wvmj.2020.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Primary care practitioners have long been encouraged to screen adult patients for depression, as reflected by national guidelines from the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) and recent federal initiatives aimed at bolstering screening rates. The Patient Health Questionnaire-2, or PHQ-2, is a simple, commonly used tool for depression screening. However, results can be skewed due to variability in the way in which questions are delivered. This study, conducted in seven West Virginia primary care centers from August 2016 to October 2017, evaluated delivery of the PHQ-2 via face-to-face administration by clinical staff compared to a scripted, video-based delivery using a tablet computer, here called the electronic PHQ-2 or ePHQ-2. This observational study finds a significant, increased difference in positive screening results when administered face-to-face by clinical staff compared to a scripted, tablet-based delivery (X2 (1, N = 655) = 5.32, p = 0.02). Given this important difference between groups, this study highlights the need for further exploration into the fidelity of PHQ-2 delivery and acceptance of such technology among patients and health care providers.","PeriodicalId":23032,"journal":{"name":"The West Virginia medical journal","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The West Virginia medical journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21885/wvmj.2020.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Primary care practitioners have long been encouraged to screen adult patients for depression, as reflected by national guidelines from the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) and recent federal initiatives aimed at bolstering screening rates. The Patient Health Questionnaire-2, or PHQ-2, is a simple, commonly used tool for depression screening. However, results can be skewed due to variability in the way in which questions are delivered. This study, conducted in seven West Virginia primary care centers from August 2016 to October 2017, evaluated delivery of the PHQ-2 via face-to-face administration by clinical staff compared to a scripted, video-based delivery using a tablet computer, here called the electronic PHQ-2 or ePHQ-2. This observational study finds a significant, increased difference in positive screening results when administered face-to-face by clinical staff compared to a scripted, tablet-based delivery (X2 (1, N = 655) = 5.32, p = 0.02). Given this important difference between groups, this study highlights the need for further exploration into the fidelity of PHQ-2 delivery and acceptance of such technology among patients and health care providers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
面对面递送与片剂递送患者健康问卷-2在初级保健中筛查抑郁症的比较
从美国预防服务工作组(USPSTF)的国家指导方针和最近旨在提高筛查率的联邦倡议中可以看出,初级保健从业人员长期以来一直被鼓励筛查成年抑郁症患者。患者健康问卷-2(简称PHQ-2)是一种简单、常用的抑郁症筛查工具。然而,由于提问方式的变化,结果可能会有所偏差。这项研究于2016年8月至2017年10月在西弗吉尼亚州的七个初级保健中心进行,评估了通过临床工作人员面对面给药的PHQ-2与使用平板电脑(这里称为电子PHQ-2或ePHQ-2)的脚本化、基于视频的给药方式的比较。这项观察性研究发现,与基于脚本的片剂给药相比,由临床人员面对面给药的阳性筛查结果差异显著增加(X2 (1, N = 655) = 5.32, p = 0.02)。鉴于两组之间的这一重要差异,本研究强调需要进一步探索PHQ-2输送的保真度以及患者和医疗保健提供者对这种技术的接受程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
COVID-19 Pandemic Effects on Seasonal Influenza Patterns in West Virginia COVID-19: West Virginia Essential Workers and the Risks They Face The Impact of COVID-19 Infection on Concurrent Traumatic Insults: An Analysis from the West Virginia Trauma System Catatonia Associated with Buprenorphine-Induced Toxic Leukoencephalopathy Recurrent Pneumothorax and a Solitary Pulmonary Nodule: A Case Report of a Rare Sequelae of Histoplasmosis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1