Diversity, inclusion and culture wars: Everything a psychotherapist should need to know about ‘intersectional feminist, trans*, critical race/whiteness, migration, (in)equality, queer, disability, post-colonial, decolonial, approaches and studies’ but is too afraid to ask?

IF 0.4 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL European Journal of Psychotherapy & Counselling Pub Date : 2023-04-03 DOI:10.1080/13642537.2022.2143607
D. Loewenthal
{"title":"Diversity, inclusion and culture wars: Everything a psychotherapist should need to know about ‘intersectional feminist, trans*, critical race/whiteness, migration, (in)equality, queer, disability, post-colonial, decolonial, approaches and studies’ but is too afraid to ask?","authors":"D. Loewenthal","doi":"10.1080/13642537.2022.2143607","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"‘Why can’t we explore with clients what we used to be able to?’ This was from a supervisee where her client had described successfully instigating sex with a waiter when she called at night for the hotel’s room service and the therapist hesitated exploring this with her client/patient for concern she might be seen as against feminism. For the psychotherapist/psychological therapist it would appear that notions of diversity and inclusion are both increasingly important, and yet increasingly difficult, to be thought about with their clients. Are such difficulties to do with the biases of the person who is the psychotherapist and/or could it also sometimes be to do with how diversity, inclusion and related terms are constructed? Overall, the current quest for ‘Diversity and Inclusion’ might be seen by many as both for the good yet complex. However, for others to question how diversity and inclusion is conceptualised can be unacceptable as it questions their very right to exist, and for yet others to get involved in any culture wars is to fiddle whilst Rome (the World) burns. Furthermore, this quest for diversity and inclusion can too frequently lead to culture war brick walling. Crucially, our inability to be clear ourselves on issues of diversity and inclusion as psychotherapists may threaten our very project. This has been where traditionally clients have been able to come to us to explore what they can’t elsewhere. For clients may now find it difficult to find a therapist who is able to explore with them their concerns around diversity and inclusion which can be complicated and may take time to consider. So when is it diversity and when is it perversity and who decides? Similarly, who and what should be included and excluded from what and by whom? Other questions include whether these changes, in what might be considered EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOTHERAPY & COUNSELLING 2023, VOL. 25, NOS. 1–2, 1–11 https://doi.org/10.1080/13642537.2022.2143607","PeriodicalId":44564,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Psychotherapy & Counselling","volume":"50 1","pages":"1 - 11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Psychotherapy & Counselling","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13642537.2022.2143607","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

‘Why can’t we explore with clients what we used to be able to?’ This was from a supervisee where her client had described successfully instigating sex with a waiter when she called at night for the hotel’s room service and the therapist hesitated exploring this with her client/patient for concern she might be seen as against feminism. For the psychotherapist/psychological therapist it would appear that notions of diversity and inclusion are both increasingly important, and yet increasingly difficult, to be thought about with their clients. Are such difficulties to do with the biases of the person who is the psychotherapist and/or could it also sometimes be to do with how diversity, inclusion and related terms are constructed? Overall, the current quest for ‘Diversity and Inclusion’ might be seen by many as both for the good yet complex. However, for others to question how diversity and inclusion is conceptualised can be unacceptable as it questions their very right to exist, and for yet others to get involved in any culture wars is to fiddle whilst Rome (the World) burns. Furthermore, this quest for diversity and inclusion can too frequently lead to culture war brick walling. Crucially, our inability to be clear ourselves on issues of diversity and inclusion as psychotherapists may threaten our very project. This has been where traditionally clients have been able to come to us to explore what they can’t elsewhere. For clients may now find it difficult to find a therapist who is able to explore with them their concerns around diversity and inclusion which can be complicated and may take time to consider. So when is it diversity and when is it perversity and who decides? Similarly, who and what should be included and excluded from what and by whom? Other questions include whether these changes, in what might be considered EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOTHERAPY & COUNSELLING 2023, VOL. 25, NOS. 1–2, 1–11 https://doi.org/10.1080/13642537.2022.2143607
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多样性、包容性和文化战争:心理治疗师应该知道的关于“交叉性女权主义者、跨性别者、批判性种族/白人、移民、(在)平等、酷儿、残疾、后殖民、非殖民、方法和研究”的一切,但却不敢问?
“为什么我们不能与客户一起探索我们过去能够做到的事情?”“这是一位主管说的,她的客户描述说,当她晚上打电话给酒店的客房服务时,她成功地与一名服务员发生了性关系,而治疗师犹豫着与她的客户/病人探讨这个问题,因为担心她可能被视为反对女权主义。”对于心理治疗师/心理治疗师来说,多样性和包容性的概念似乎越来越重要,但与他们的客户一起思考也越来越困难。这些困难是否与心理治疗师的偏见有关,或者有时也与多样性、包容性和相关术语的构建方式有关?总的来说,目前对“多样性和包容性”的追求可能被许多人视为既好又复杂。然而,对其他人来说,质疑多样性和包容性是如何概念化的是不可接受的,因为这质疑了他们存在的权利,而对其他人来说,参与任何文化战争都是在罗马(世界)燃烧时胡搞。此外,这种对多样性和包容性的追求往往会导致文化战争的砖墙。至关重要的是,作为心理治疗师,我们无法明确自己在多样性和包容性问题上的立场,这可能会威胁到我们的项目。传统上,客户可以来我们这里探索他们在其他地方无法探索的东西。因为客户现在可能会发现很难找到一位能够与他们一起探讨他们对多样性和包容性的担忧的治疗师,这可能很复杂,可能需要时间来考虑。什么时候是多样性,什么时候是变态,谁来决定?同样,谁和什么应该被包括在什么和由谁排除在外?其他问题包括,这些变化是否在《欧洲心理治疗与咨询杂志》2023年第25卷第1-2号,第1-11号https://doi.org/10.1080/13642537.2022.2143607
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
期刊最新文献
Travelling in time: Using interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) to examine temporal aspects of the personal experience of issues in health and well-being Towards a psychotherapy publishing ethics concordat Reading with love: Developing therapeutic imagination through purposeful engagement with qualitative research Wished I’d been there: Reflections on the special issue’s articles as refracted through my appreciations for qualitative researchers’ innovativeness Thematic analysis: A practical guide
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1