Spatial distribution of ground-motion variability in broadband ground-motion simulations

A. Iwaki, T. Maeda, N. Morikawa, H. Fujiwara
{"title":"Spatial distribution of ground-motion variability in broadband ground-motion simulations","authors":"A. Iwaki, T. Maeda, N. Morikawa, H. Fujiwara","doi":"10.1785/0120170150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ground-motion prediction for a scenario earthquake requires evaluation of both the average ground-motion level and ground-motion variability due to model uncertainties. This study aims to evaluate the ground-motion variability due to aleatory variability of the source parameters by modeling ground motion of the 2000 Tottori earthquake (strike-slip type) and the 2004 Chuetsu earthquake (reverse-fault type). The source models are based on the characterized source model by the “recipe” (HERP, 2016) with fault location, size, and geometry as given parameters. Aleatory variability for the three source parameters is considered: (1) asperity location, (2) rupture initiation point, and (3) seismic moment. Two asperities are randomly located on the fault with no overlapping. A rupture initiation point is chosen randomly from the 2 km grids on the fault. Seismic moment M0 is sampled from a normal distribution in which the mean value is given by the M0-S relation (S being the fault area) by Irikura and Miyake (2001) and mean+2σ equals to 2M0. Short-period level A, another important parameter in the characterized source model, is derived from A-M0 relation by Dan et al. (2001). Ground motion for each earthquake is simulated by a hybrid approach; 3D FDM (Aoi and Fujiwara, 1999) for long periods (> 1 s) and the stochastic Green’s function method (Dan and Sato, 1998) for short periods (< 1 s), using a set of 50 source models and a 3D velocity model of J-SHIS v2 (Fujiwara et al., 2012). For the 2004 Chuetsu earthquake, simulations using a simple 1D stratified velocity model are also conducted in order to exclude the effects of the complicated subsurface structure around the source area. From the ground-motion simulation results with 50 source models for each earthquake, standard deviation (SD) of ground-motion indexes, ln of 5% damped acceleration response (Sa), PGA, and PGV, are analyzed at 10 km interval mesh. Distance and azimuthal dependence of SD are observed; the characteristics of the spatial distribution of SD differ from short periods to long periods. It is also found that the spatial distribution of SD is largely distorted by the complicated subsurface velocity structure for the Chuetsu earthquake. As a step toward constructing a model of ground-motion variability in ground-motion prediction for a scenario earthquake, we attempt to fit the SD, each for strike-slip type and reverse-fault type, with a simple regression model using the fault distance and directivity parameters. Effects of variability in other source parameters, such as rupture velocity and source time function, should be studied in our future works. Modeling variabilities in such source parameters requires investigation in physicsor empirical-based criteria.","PeriodicalId":14836,"journal":{"name":"Japan Geoscience Union","volume":"73 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japan Geoscience Union","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1785/0120170150","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Ground-motion prediction for a scenario earthquake requires evaluation of both the average ground-motion level and ground-motion variability due to model uncertainties. This study aims to evaluate the ground-motion variability due to aleatory variability of the source parameters by modeling ground motion of the 2000 Tottori earthquake (strike-slip type) and the 2004 Chuetsu earthquake (reverse-fault type). The source models are based on the characterized source model by the “recipe” (HERP, 2016) with fault location, size, and geometry as given parameters. Aleatory variability for the three source parameters is considered: (1) asperity location, (2) rupture initiation point, and (3) seismic moment. Two asperities are randomly located on the fault with no overlapping. A rupture initiation point is chosen randomly from the 2 km grids on the fault. Seismic moment M0 is sampled from a normal distribution in which the mean value is given by the M0-S relation (S being the fault area) by Irikura and Miyake (2001) and mean+2σ equals to 2M0. Short-period level A, another important parameter in the characterized source model, is derived from A-M0 relation by Dan et al. (2001). Ground motion for each earthquake is simulated by a hybrid approach; 3D FDM (Aoi and Fujiwara, 1999) for long periods (> 1 s) and the stochastic Green’s function method (Dan and Sato, 1998) for short periods (< 1 s), using a set of 50 source models and a 3D velocity model of J-SHIS v2 (Fujiwara et al., 2012). For the 2004 Chuetsu earthquake, simulations using a simple 1D stratified velocity model are also conducted in order to exclude the effects of the complicated subsurface structure around the source area. From the ground-motion simulation results with 50 source models for each earthquake, standard deviation (SD) of ground-motion indexes, ln of 5% damped acceleration response (Sa), PGA, and PGV, are analyzed at 10 km interval mesh. Distance and azimuthal dependence of SD are observed; the characteristics of the spatial distribution of SD differ from short periods to long periods. It is also found that the spatial distribution of SD is largely distorted by the complicated subsurface velocity structure for the Chuetsu earthquake. As a step toward constructing a model of ground-motion variability in ground-motion prediction for a scenario earthquake, we attempt to fit the SD, each for strike-slip type and reverse-fault type, with a simple regression model using the fault distance and directivity parameters. Effects of variability in other source parameters, such as rupture velocity and source time function, should be studied in our future works. Modeling variabilities in such source parameters requires investigation in physicsor empirical-based criteria.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
宽带地震动模拟中地震动变异性的空间分布
模拟地震的地震动预测需要评估平均地震动水平和由于模式不确定性而引起的地震动变率。本文通过对2000年鸟取县地震(走滑型)和2004年中越地震(逆断层型)的地震动模拟,评价了震源参数突变引起的地震动变异性。源模型基于“配方”(HERP, 2016)的特征源模型,以断层位置、大小和几何形状为给定参数。考虑了三个震源参数的变异性:(1)凸起位置,(2)破裂起始点,(3)地震矩。两个凸起随机分布在断层上,没有重叠。从断层上的2公里网格中随机选择一个破裂起始点。地震矩M0从正态分布中采样,其中平均值由iirikura和Miyake(2001)的M0-S关系给出(S为断层面积),平均值+2σ等于2M0。短周期水平A是特征源模型中的另一个重要参数,由Dan等人(2001)从A- m0关系推导而来。用混合方法模拟每次地震的地面运动;使用一组50个源模型和J-SHIS v2三维速度模型(Fujiwara et al., 2012),长周期(> 1 s)的3D FDM (Aoi and Fujiwara, 1999)和短周期(< 1 s)的随机Green’s函数方法(Dan and Sato, 1998)。对于2004年的中越地震,为了排除震源周围复杂地下结构的影响,也采用了简单的一维分层速度模型进行了模拟。利用50个震源模型对每次地震的地震动模拟结果,分析了10 km间隔网格上地震动指标的标准差(SD)、5%阻尼加速度响应的ln (Sa)、PGA和PGV。观察SD的距离和方位依赖性;短周期和长周期SD的空间分布特征不同。中越地震复杂的地下速度结构极大地扭曲了SD的空间分布。作为构建情景地震地震动预测中地震动变率模型的一步,我们尝试使用断层距离和指向性参数的简单回归模型拟合走滑类型和逆断层类型的SD。其他震源参数(如破裂速度和震源时间函数)变化的影响应在我们未来的工作中加以研究。在这样的源参数建模的可变性需要调查在物理或经验为基础的标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Tectonic Landform and Paleoseismic Activity of the Northernmost Sumatran Fault, Aceh Province, Indonesia Pressure-to-depth conversion models for metamorphic rocks: derivation and applications Standardized Variability Index (SVI): A multiscale index to assess the variability of precipitation Overpressured underthrust sediment in the Nankai Trough forearc inferred from high-frequency receiver function inversion Simple Topographic Parameter for Along-trench Friction Distribution of Shallow Megathrust Fault
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1