Interaction between patient and health professional

IF 1 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Journal of Visual Communication in Medicine Pub Date : 2021-01-15 DOI:10.1558/CAM.39518
A. Holm
{"title":"Interaction between patient and health professional","authors":"A. Holm","doi":"10.1558/CAM.39518","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article presents a theoretical view on culturally embedded thinking and action in encounters between patient and health professional. A key point of the analysis indicates that a highly efficient health sector may entail an implicit duality: on the one hand, the health professional can and often must relate pragmatically to the patient in order to solve problems and do so quickly, while on the other, the professional may be personally challenged when embedded cultural thinking leads to conflicts or dilemmas. This means that a purely pragmatic perspective will be challenged when such conflicts arise. The article looks at interrelated concepts such as ‘culture’, ‘prejudice’ and ‘meaning’ in order to shed light on the presuppositions that are brought into the cultural encounter between patient and health professional. This kind of analysis will hopefully contribute to a raised awareness of what is actually – apart from pragmatic problem solving – going on in such encounters. The conceptual framework used in this article primarily draws on the German philosopher Hans-Georg Gadamer, which is contrasted with the pragmatic perspective from the American philosopher Richard Rorty.","PeriodicalId":43868,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Visual Communication in Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Visual Communication in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1558/CAM.39518","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article presents a theoretical view on culturally embedded thinking and action in encounters between patient and health professional. A key point of the analysis indicates that a highly efficient health sector may entail an implicit duality: on the one hand, the health professional can and often must relate pragmatically to the patient in order to solve problems and do so quickly, while on the other, the professional may be personally challenged when embedded cultural thinking leads to conflicts or dilemmas. This means that a purely pragmatic perspective will be challenged when such conflicts arise. The article looks at interrelated concepts such as ‘culture’, ‘prejudice’ and ‘meaning’ in order to shed light on the presuppositions that are brought into the cultural encounter between patient and health professional. This kind of analysis will hopefully contribute to a raised awareness of what is actually – apart from pragmatic problem solving – going on in such encounters. The conceptual framework used in this article primarily draws on the German philosopher Hans-Georg Gadamer, which is contrasted with the pragmatic perspective from the American philosopher Richard Rorty.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
患者与卫生专业人员之间的互动
这篇文章提出了一个理论观点,文化嵌入的思维和行动,在遇到病人和卫生专业人员。分析的一个关键点表明,高效的卫生部门可能包含一种隐含的两重性:一方面,卫生专业人员能够而且往往必须以务实的态度与患者建立联系,以便迅速解决问题,而另一方面,当根深蒂固的文化思维导致冲突或困境时,专业人员可能会受到个人挑战。这意味着当这种冲突出现时,纯粹的实用主义观点将受到挑战。本文着眼于诸如“文化”、“偏见”和“意义”等相互关联的概念,以便阐明患者与卫生专业人员之间的文化接触所带来的预设。这种分析有望有助于提高人们的意识,即除了务实的解决问题之外,在这种遭遇中究竟发生了什么。本文使用的概念框架主要借鉴了德国哲学家汉斯-乔治·伽达默尔的观点,并与美国哲学家理查德·罗蒂的实用主义观点进行了对比。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Visual Communication in Medicine
Journal of Visual Communication in Medicine RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
14.30%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: The Journal is a quarterly, international, peer-reviewed journal that acts as a vehicle for the interchange of information and ideas in the production, manipulation, storage and transport of images for medical education, records and research.
期刊最新文献
Comparative study of AR infographic posters vs. offline videos for micro-video delivery in cardiology education. Visualising the art of medicine: a showcase of creative endeavour from Bristol Medical School, UK. The origin of the popular iconic heart symbol: fiction or facts? Randomised controlled trial: role of virtual interactive 3-dimensional models in anatomical and medical education. Multisensory medical illustrations of Buruli ulcer for improved disease detection, help seeking behaviour and adherence to treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1