Who needs to learn what from whom? Understanding quality management by differentiating organisations and practices

H. Eriksson
{"title":"Who needs to learn what from whom? Understanding quality management by differentiating organisations and practices","authors":"H. Eriksson","doi":"10.1109/IEEM.2013.6962421","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this paper is to understand quality management by describing differences between organisations and practices. This study looks at the scores for different criteria from the different quality award applicants in Sweden between 1992 and 2010. It is noteworthy to mention that the service industry outperforms the manufacturing industry. Furthermore, and maybe not surprisingly, large organisations are ahead of small and medium enterprises in the race for quality progress. In general, when comparing public with private organisations, private organisations do better, and especially process issues seem to be easier for private firms. This study also suggests that process management as it is described and taught needs to be revised to better fit the organisations. The time has come to question old truths about quality management, especially regarding who is better than whom at what, and who needs to learn what from whom.","PeriodicalId":6454,"journal":{"name":"2013 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management","volume":"140 1","pages":"295-299"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IEEM.2013.6962421","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to understand quality management by describing differences between organisations and practices. This study looks at the scores for different criteria from the different quality award applicants in Sweden between 1992 and 2010. It is noteworthy to mention that the service industry outperforms the manufacturing industry. Furthermore, and maybe not surprisingly, large organisations are ahead of small and medium enterprises in the race for quality progress. In general, when comparing public with private organisations, private organisations do better, and especially process issues seem to be easier for private firms. This study also suggests that process management as it is described and taught needs to be revised to better fit the organisations. The time has come to question old truths about quality management, especially regarding who is better than whom at what, and who needs to learn what from whom.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
谁需要向谁学习什么?通过区分组织和实践来理解质量管理
本文的目的是通过描述组织和实践之间的差异来理解质量管理。这项研究着眼于1992年至2010年间瑞典不同质量奖申请人的不同标准得分。值得注意的是,服务业的表现优于制造业。此外,也许并不奇怪,在质量进步的竞赛中,大型组织领先于中小型企业。一般来说,当比较公共组织和私人组织时,私人组织做得更好,特别是流程问题似乎对私人公司更容易。这项研究还表明,过程管理,因为它被描述和教授需要修改,以更好地适应组织。是时候质疑关于质量管理的古老真理了,特别是关于谁在什么方面比谁更好,以及谁需要从谁那里学习什么。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Extension of the PROMETHEE Method to the Multicriteria Dual Clustering Problem On the Necessity for Improving Effectiveness of Qualification Process for Spare Parts Additive Manufacturing in a Circular Economy Supply Chain Selecting Temporary Flood Shelter Locations by P-Center Model A Feasible Schema Design Strategy for Amazon DynamoDB: A Nested Normal Form Approach Flood Shelters Location Using P-median Model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1