Experimental Study of Utilization Coconut Fiber as Additional Material and Slag as a Cement Substitution Against Compressive Strength and Split Tensile Strength of Concrete

Q4 Physics and Astronomy Neutron News Pub Date : 2022-07-31 DOI:10.29138/neutron.v22i01.174
Adlan Rafli Pramudya, A. Sumarno
{"title":"Experimental Study of Utilization Coconut Fiber as Additional Material and Slag as a Cement Substitution Against Compressive Strength and Split Tensile Strength of Concrete","authors":"Adlan Rafli Pramudya, A. Sumarno","doi":"10.29138/neutron.v22i01.174","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Development developments have an impact on the building materials industry sector. To reduce CO2 emissions due to soaring productivity of cement, the industry can use Ground Granulated Blast Furnace Slag (GGBFS) as a substitute for cement. This study aims to determine the effect of using GGBFS as a substitute for cement and coconut fiber as an additive on the workability, density, water absorption, compressive strength and split tensile strength of concrete at 3, 7, and 28 days. In this study using the experimental method with a total of 84 samples of cylindrical specimens with a size of 10cm x 20cm. This research was conducted with variations of GGBFS substitution of cement (0%, 35.5%, 43.5%) and coconut fiber as an additive (0.23%, 0.63%).The results of this study indicate that the optimum compressive strength test value at the age of 28 days is at GGBFS (35.5%) and coconut fiber (0.63%) reaches an average compressive strength of 32.32 Mpa. The SU1 variation (24.63 Mpa), SU2 variation (30.20 Mpa), SU3 variation (30.77 Mpa), SU5 variation (28.16 Mpa), SU6 variation (28.31 Mpa). Optimal splitting strength at the age of 28 days, namely the SU4 variation with GGBFS 35.5% and coconut fibers (0.63%) reached an average split tensile strength of 2.23 Mpa.","PeriodicalId":39014,"journal":{"name":"Neutron News","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neutron News","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29138/neutron.v22i01.174","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Physics and Astronomy","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Development developments have an impact on the building materials industry sector. To reduce CO2 emissions due to soaring productivity of cement, the industry can use Ground Granulated Blast Furnace Slag (GGBFS) as a substitute for cement. This study aims to determine the effect of using GGBFS as a substitute for cement and coconut fiber as an additive on the workability, density, water absorption, compressive strength and split tensile strength of concrete at 3, 7, and 28 days. In this study using the experimental method with a total of 84 samples of cylindrical specimens with a size of 10cm x 20cm. This research was conducted with variations of GGBFS substitution of cement (0%, 35.5%, 43.5%) and coconut fiber as an additive (0.23%, 0.63%).The results of this study indicate that the optimum compressive strength test value at the age of 28 days is at GGBFS (35.5%) and coconut fiber (0.63%) reaches an average compressive strength of 32.32 Mpa. The SU1 variation (24.63 Mpa), SU2 variation (30.20 Mpa), SU3 variation (30.77 Mpa), SU5 variation (28.16 Mpa), SU6 variation (28.31 Mpa). Optimal splitting strength at the age of 28 days, namely the SU4 variation with GGBFS 35.5% and coconut fibers (0.63%) reached an average split tensile strength of 2.23 Mpa.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用椰子纤维作为附加材料和矿渣替代水泥对混凝土抗压强度和劈裂抗拉强度的试验研究
发展对建筑材料工业部门产生了影响。由于水泥生产效率的提高,为了减少二氧化碳的排放,该行业可以使用矿渣粉(GGBFS)作为水泥的替代品。本研究旨在确定使用GGBFS替代水泥和椰子纤维作为添加剂对混凝土在3,7和28天的和易性、密度、吸水率、抗压强度和劈裂抗拉强度的影响。本研究采用实验方法共选取84个尺寸为10cm × 20cm的圆柱形试样。本研究采用水泥(0%、35.5%、43.5%)和椰子纤维(0.23%、0.63%)替代GGBFS的方法进行。研究结果表明:28日龄时,椰子纤维的最佳抗压强度试验值为GGBFS(35.5%),椰子纤维的平均抗压强度为32.32 Mpa(0.63%)。其中,SU1变化(24.63 Mpa)、SU2变化(30.20 Mpa)、SU3变化(30.77 Mpa)、SU5变化(28.16 Mpa)、SU6变化(28.31 Mpa)。28日龄时的最佳劈裂强度,即以GGBFS为35.5%,椰子纤维为0.63%的SU4变异,平均劈裂强度为2.23 Mpa。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neutron News
Neutron News Physics and Astronomy-Nuclear and High Energy Physics
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
期刊最新文献
Thermoreversible Gels of Hollow Silica Nanorod Dispersions Unveiling Nanoparticle Spin Structures Through Polarized Neutron Scattering Stefan U. Egelhaaf (1963–2023) Paul Burlet (1939–2023) Rapid Prediction of Inelastic Neutron Scattering Spectra
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1