Mobile technologies in the ancient Sahara and beyond

IF 1.1 2区 历史学 0 ARCHAEOLOGY Azania-Archaeological Research in Africa Pub Date : 2021-10-02 DOI:10.1080/0067270X.2021.1983301
A. Mayor
{"title":"Mobile technologies in the ancient Sahara and beyond","authors":"A. Mayor","doi":"10.1080/0067270X.2021.1983301","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"highlights its main contributions. Much effort went into the writing of this volume because of the number of authors involved and its multidisciplinary approach (archaeology, anthropology, linguistics, botany, zoology, etc.). The book offers a complex vision of different organisational forms of economic life and different evolutionary patterns of Sino-African exchanges. A broad array of commodities (ceramics, textile, coins, etc.) traded between China and East Africa that have been recovered from archaeological excavations are described and discussed. However, the book is not without its flaws. Firstly, the same artefacts appear to have been discussed several times in different articles, creating some redundancy that weakens the general structure of the book. This may be due to the difficulty of co-ordinating the contributions, to which we can add the differences in scientific paradigms and methodologies of the 19 authors, who come from various scientific backgrounds. Readers may expect the book to offer a two-way Sino-African connected history both spatially and chronologically, but, in fact, it is the East African side that is privileged. Furthermore, in the preface, Chapurukha Kusimba, the lead editor and contributor, states that the aim of the book is to theorise China-East Africa relationships in their own terms. However, despite the best intentions of the contributors, this very theoretical ambition is not realised. Instead, the authors have presented syntheses of the current state of knowledge of their own particular topics. None has undertaken specific historiographical reflections, from either the perspectives of politics or science. However, such historiographical reflections are indispensable for comprehending the book’s role in what is a new phase of Chinese-influenced historiography in East Africa. Moreover, dealing with Sino-African relations implies thinking about its articulation in a complex geography of space and time, not just dealing with its two endpoints. Unfortunately, intermediate spaces such as Southeast Asia, South Asia and the Persian Gulf are not considered in the book. Similarly, the plurality within both China and East Africa is also not sufficiently considered. Finally, the investigation of such a long chronology of Sino-African relations is a perilous adventure if one does not pay enough attention to the cyclical evolution of the Indian Ocean world-system that has already been highlighted by other researchers.","PeriodicalId":45689,"journal":{"name":"Azania-Archaeological Research in Africa","volume":"9 1","pages":"540 - 542"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Azania-Archaeological Research in Africa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0067270X.2021.1983301","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

highlights its main contributions. Much effort went into the writing of this volume because of the number of authors involved and its multidisciplinary approach (archaeology, anthropology, linguistics, botany, zoology, etc.). The book offers a complex vision of different organisational forms of economic life and different evolutionary patterns of Sino-African exchanges. A broad array of commodities (ceramics, textile, coins, etc.) traded between China and East Africa that have been recovered from archaeological excavations are described and discussed. However, the book is not without its flaws. Firstly, the same artefacts appear to have been discussed several times in different articles, creating some redundancy that weakens the general structure of the book. This may be due to the difficulty of co-ordinating the contributions, to which we can add the differences in scientific paradigms and methodologies of the 19 authors, who come from various scientific backgrounds. Readers may expect the book to offer a two-way Sino-African connected history both spatially and chronologically, but, in fact, it is the East African side that is privileged. Furthermore, in the preface, Chapurukha Kusimba, the lead editor and contributor, states that the aim of the book is to theorise China-East Africa relationships in their own terms. However, despite the best intentions of the contributors, this very theoretical ambition is not realised. Instead, the authors have presented syntheses of the current state of knowledge of their own particular topics. None has undertaken specific historiographical reflections, from either the perspectives of politics or science. However, such historiographical reflections are indispensable for comprehending the book’s role in what is a new phase of Chinese-influenced historiography in East Africa. Moreover, dealing with Sino-African relations implies thinking about its articulation in a complex geography of space and time, not just dealing with its two endpoints. Unfortunately, intermediate spaces such as Southeast Asia, South Asia and the Persian Gulf are not considered in the book. Similarly, the plurality within both China and East Africa is also not sufficiently considered. Finally, the investigation of such a long chronology of Sino-African relations is a perilous adventure if one does not pay enough attention to the cyclical evolution of the Indian Ocean world-system that has already been highlighted by other researchers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
古撒哈拉及其他地区的移动技术
突出其主要贡献。由于涉及的作者数量和它的多学科方法(考古学,人类学,语言学,植物学,动物学等),这本书的写作付出了很大的努力。这本书对经济生活的不同组织形式和中非交流的不同演化模式提供了一个复杂的视角。广泛的商品(陶瓷,纺织品,硬币等)贸易之间的中国和东非已经从考古发掘中恢复描述和讨论。然而,这本书也不是没有缺点。首先,相同的人工制品似乎在不同的文章中被讨论了几次,造成了一些冗余,削弱了本书的总体结构。这可能是由于协调贡献的困难,我们可以加上来自不同科学背景的19位作者在科学范式和方法上的差异。读者们可能期望这本书在空间和时间上提供一种双向的中非联系历史,但事实上,这是东非方面的特权。此外,在前言中,主编兼撰稿人库辛巴(Chapurukha Kusimba)指出,本书的目的是用自己的方式对中国与东非的关系进行理论化。然而,尽管贡献者的初衷是最好的,但这一理论抱负并没有实现。相反,作者提出了他们自己特定主题的知识现状的综合。没有人从政治或科学的角度进行过具体的史学反思。然而,这样的史学反思对于理解这本书在受中国影响的东非史学的新阶段所扮演的角色是必不可少的。此外,处理中非关系意味着考虑其在复杂的空间和时间地理中的衔接,而不仅仅是处理其两个端点。不幸的是,像东南亚、南亚和波斯湾这样的中间空间没有被考虑在书中。同样,中国和东非内部的多元性也没有得到充分考虑。最后,如果对其他研究者已经强调过的印度洋世界体系的周期性演变不给予足够的关注,那么对如此长的中非关系年表进行调查将是一次危险的冒险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
9.10%
发文量
18
期刊最新文献
Kasongo-Tongoni: a nineteenth-century caravan town in Maniema, Democratic Republic of Congo Pleistocene archaeology and environments of the Free State, South Africa PhD Abstract Adornment deposits: a study of bead and jewellery remains from Late Antiquity tombs in the Red Sea port of Berenike Paul Sinclair (1949–2023) — In memoriam
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1